Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Luck as a running threat


zibby43

Recommended Posts

Belligerent (I read this board often throughout the week and if you classify what I said as belligerent, I'd love to know how you feel about some of the other posts that grace this board, particularly on game day)?  Whining (Are you "whining" about my posts?)?  Hardly. 

 

It's just not a fun discussion when one-liners such as "You can't be happy with one of the top offenses," "Ugh," etc. are thrown out.  That's not bringing much to the table - at all.  Quite frankly, there weren't many well-developed rebuttals.  A few "specter" of injury posts. 

 

Didn't bring much to the debate?  I cited previous running plays utilized by Pep (e.g., the naked bootleg against SF), analogized to other teams effectively utilizing their QBs' mobility, etc. 

 

Again, I don't think you read the entirety of my posts.  Nor did you read the entirety of my replies. 

 

I'm not going to lose sleep over it.  Neither are you.  Hopefully we'll get along more amicably with respect to other topics.

No problem. Just a little tussle over the internet. Now, if you post about about how over-rated Bill Polian was, we'll become best friends!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

No problem. Just a little tussle over the internet. Now, if you post about about how over-rated Bill Polian was, we'll become best friends!

 

How can I like a guy that drafted Pat Angerer (no hard feelings, Pat) and Jerry Hughes?  Although I have sat at the same dinner table as him.  In a word, stuffy.   Polian got some right and got some wrong.  Toward the end of his tenure, more wrong than right.  See the Curtis Painter show. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The rule interpretation of the QB that runs a read option is that he become the same as a running back and loses his "protections" by rule of what cannot be done to a QB in terms of hits not just when the QB keeps it the football and actually does run but also when he leaves it in the belly of the RB. In other words the QB can be hit like any other player even when he hands it off or after the handoff...........no thanks.

Not advocating for lots of read option, but uswd sparingly it's easy yardage. I think nick foles kept it twice against the Colts and picked up around 10 yards each time without getting hit. I will take two cheap and easy first downs per game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I do truly believe his replacement is here in Freeland. Freeland got thrust into playing time well before he was supposed to. An Uber athletic freak who needed a NFL strength and conditioning program. I think his ceiling is quite high. I also still like the idea of Jake Witt as the swing tackle.
    • Braden Smith is only 28 years old.  We just witnessed Ballard resign Grover at age 30 and Kenny at age 28.  He also extended Buckner at age 30.  Kelly is 30.  I would think that if Smith continues to perform at a high level this year he would have an excellent chance of getting extended next year like we did with Buckner.  That would lower his cap hit as well. Kelly is probably in a more vulnerable position if he wants to keep playing.  If the team really shows they are approaching Super Bowl contention he might want to return.  So much depends on his concussion issues and his performance and availability this year as well.  Fortunately we might have drafted his replacement this year.  Familiarity and continuity on the OL is very important as we know.  So I can see Ballard trying to keep it together as long as possible if the players continue to perform and our window remains open.  The good news is Ballard drafted for future needs on the OL this year.  I expect that will continue so I could see tackle being one of the higher picks next year.  
    • Ballard was perfectly clear Smith was drafted as a guard. And he directly commented to the importance of being able to control the "depth of the pocket". It is a terrible shame that Smith wasn't a guard for us. He definitely could have been a perennial Pro Bowler and perhaps All-Pro some years.  The guy has given up a lot of pressures against speed rushers. And have you ever seen a highlight of him making a great block out in space in the screen game, etc.? Smith is a superb mauler, period.  As for Fries, he is no more than adequate. He gets mauled by big tackles giving up pressure with bull rushes. And worse yet, he can not bend low and win the war when we need a yard. They list him at 305 and he plays like it. Gonglaves shouldn't have any trouble beating him out in due time. Surely by mid-season. Lets hope so. The real miracle would be that Gonclaves would be able to pass block as well as Smith does at RT and we finally get to see Smith excel inside.
    • All of the good Pacers teams with Reggie, George and now with Haliburton are somewhat similar.  At their very best, they're always still just a step below elite, a step below the the Jordan, Kobe/Shaq and Lebron teams.  The one time they did have supreme talent they threw it away in Detroit.   The good news is there currently is no great team.  Boston could get a lifetime achievement award championship - just stick around long enough and you might win one - but the Celtics scare no one.  Compared to great teams from the past, Dallas isn't much.     The Pacers shouldn't be thinking 3-4 years from now.  While the NBA is weak, they should make a push in the next year or two.
    • Man, I was happy that the Pacers won!  I loathe NY far more than I do Indy, and I knew the Celts would have an easier time with Indy.  Not that this series has been easy (well, except game 2).     I don’t disagree with you regarding your lineup; my only point before was that Russell would have been phenomenal as a NBA player today just as he was 60 years ago. Keep in mind that he was a two-time NCAA champion as well as an Olympic gold winning captain.   Russell with today’s training would have still been the best defensive player perhaps ever, and would have been a more proficient scorer.  
  • Members

    • KB

      KB 1,152

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • w87r

      w87r 14,430

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 19,904

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jvan1973

      jvan1973 10,984

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TheNewGuy

      TheNewGuy 50

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • G8R

      G8R 54

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Flash7

      Flash7 1,910

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • RollerColt

      RollerColt 12,553

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • throwing BBZ

      throwing BBZ 3,779

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • T-Cubed

      T-Cubed 17

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...