Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

So...ummm Seattle clinched home field advantage?


bap1331

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 172
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Do i really need to say? Its luck of course. Wilson is a game manager punk, let's be honest.

Honestly we see different things when watching the games.

 

 

There are close to 30 teams that wish they has such a manager. That's a good system in Seattle. Maybe some other teams will emulate it next season. It is a copy cat league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes but the eye test is even bigger.

Your standards of a long shot are extraordinarily low.

The eye test does reveal a lot though. It reveals one guy on an extremely talented team top to bottom. And another who is on a team with holes everywhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your standards of a long shot are extraordinarily low.

The eye test does reveal a lot though. It reveals one guy on an extremely talented team top to bottom. And another who is on a team with holes everywhere.

 

Same 15 year old argument. You should tweet Irsay about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing impacts a team more than a QB. Just look at Brady this year as proof positive.

Perfect example. Bad D, bad running, and bad WRs didn't effect Brady early this year? Thanks for the help on that one.

I better go apologize to that Baltimore D back in 2000. I was crediting them incorrectly in that SB season. Whereas I should have been crediting Trent Dilfer. As he had the greatest impact of all.

Oh man I have to apologize to the Buccaneers too....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perfect example. Bad D, bad running, and bad WRs didn't effect Brady early this year? Thanks for the help on that one.

I better go apologize to that Baltimore D back in 2000. I was crediting them incorrectly in that SB season. Whereas I should have been crediting Trent Dilfer. As he had the greatest impact of all.

Oh man I have to apologize to the Buccaneers too....

And yet through it all the Patriots are 9-3. Why? Because they have a great QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes. A great veteran QB. Who even as great as he is, struggled around a bad team.

Correct. Glad we agree bad teams can bring down even the best QB.

When did they bring down Brady? They're 9-3 despite Mayo, Wilfork, Kelly, Denard, Hernandez, Vollmer, Gronk, Vereen and Welker. All gone, out for the season or missed significant time. And I left some out. They are winning. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When did they bring down Brady? They're 9-3 despite Mayo, Wilfork, Kelly, Denard, Hernandez, Vollmer, Gronk, Vereen and Welker. All gone, out for the season or missed significant time. And I left some out. They are winning.

I was unaware you can't win games if a QB struggles. Interesting.

If you want to put your fingers in your ears and pretend Tom didn't struggle earlier this year when the offensive injuries were at their worst, more power to you.

I mean you're wrong, but got to respect someone who's willing to stick to their guns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The saints have the 2nd best record so even if they go to the AFC championship. They will go back to Seattle. Not only that, I don't see any NFC teams going to Seattle to beat them there. Here are the possible teams:

-Cardinals

-49ers

-Lions

-Panthers(closest chance)

-Cowboys (LOL! Romo will be paranoid from last time)

-Philly

-Chicago(maybe!)

-Green Bay

-Giants(best chance...they can beat anyone)

Well pretty much it's closed up, Sea hawks vs the best AFC team...

the Seahawks go to the afc championship game ? That would be a fun twist
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was unaware you can't win games if a QB struggles. Interesting.

If you want to put your fingers in your ears and pretend Tom didn't struggle earlier this year when the offensive injuries were at their worst, more power to you.

I mean you're wrong, but got to respect someone who's willing to stick to their guns.

Wrong? He's still struggling but getting much better. The only reason they were winning was because of him. With a lesser QB/LEADER the team would have folded before the season started. I give the coach much credit as well. YES they win because of BB and Brady. Put those two in Texas or Indy for example and they're competing for a SB THIS season. Without them not so much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was unaware you can't win games if a QB struggles. Interesting.

If you want to put your fingers in your ears and pretend Tom didn't struggle earlier this year when the offensive injuries were at their worst, more power to you.

I mean you're wrong, but got to respect someone who's willing to stick to their guns.

Wrong? He's still struggling but getting much better. The only reason they were winning was because of him. With a lesser QB/LEADER the team would have folded before the season started. I give the coach much credit as well. YES they win because of BB and Brady. Put those two in Texas or Indy for example and they're competing for a SB THIS season. Without them not so much.

lmao I like how you're twisting this to be a discussion about wins when we are talking about stats, and how a subpar team can affect the stats of a QB.

Wilson far better than Brady this year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lmao I like how you're twisting this to be a discussion about wins when we are talking about stats, and how a subpar team can affect the stats of a QB.

Wilson far better than Brady this year?

Stats? As a great coach once said (The greatest in fact)"Stats are for losers".

Winning is for winners.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you're a loser for comparing Wilson's stats to Luck's to make the argument he's far better?

You're an odd fellow, but whatever floats your boat.

I liked Wilson before I even looked at those stats. Plus Dusty said Luck was better than Wilson when he's clearly not. You can use a stat to back a point but not to make one. Brady wins without stats. Who else does that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I liked Wilson before I even looked at those stats. Plus Dusty said Luck was better than Wilson when he's clearly not. You can use a stat to back a point but not to make one. Brady wins without stats. Who else does that?

When did I say that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I liked Wilson before I even looked at those stats. Plus Dusty said Luck was better than Wilson when he's clearly not. You can use a stat to back a point but not to make one. Brady wins without stats. Who else does that?

Luck does that since apparently his stats don't impress you, yet he wins lmao.

Also Tim Tebow, but let's keep that Pandora's box closed shall we?

I do believe your quote was that stats are for losers. Not "Stats are only for loser if they aren't backing something up with them."

Wilson is better than Brady cuz stats. Logic.

You are trying though. Like I said. There is something admirable about what it is you do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Luck does that since apparently his stats don't impress you, yet he wins lmao.

Also Tim Tebow, but let's keep that Pandora's box closed shall we?

I do believe your quote was that stats are for losers. Not "Stats are only for loser if they aren't backing something up with them."

Wilson is better than Brady cuz stats. Logic.

You are trying though. Like I said. There is something admirable about what it is you do.

Luck and the Colts are mediocre. I would take Wilson over Brady in a heartbeat at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Popular Now

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If there are no more injuries then it's probably going to be Harrison, Cross, and Blackmon.
    • Hey Smonroe good to see you again,   Buckle up for the wildest ride of the Colts' training camp this year. So get this: Anthony Richardson, our once-heralded franchise quarterback hopeful, has taken a detour from throwing touchdowns to chasing them as a defensive end. Yeah, I'm serious. It's like watching a superhero trade in his cape for a pair of cleats.   Remember when Richardson was supposed to be the next Manning or Luck? Now he's out there, trading playbook pages for defensive schemes and praying his raw athleticism can translate to sacking quarterbacks instead of being one. Life comes at you fast, folks. I'm on the sidelines, and Richardson looks like he's still wondering if someone's pranking him. Meanwhile, Laitu Latu, the defensive behemoth, is showing him the ropes with all the subtlety of a bull in a china shop. "Come on, Richardson, channel that quarterback precision into tackling!" Latu bellows, as if Richardson's secretly been holding back.   After practice, I catch Richardson in the locker room, staring at his battered playbook like it's the Rosetta Stone. The guy looks lost, but you gotta give him credit – he's trying to morph into a defensive beast under Latu's tutelage. Who knows, maybe he'll discover his inner J.J. Watt next.   Fast forward to game day, and the announcer's like, "And now, the moment you've all been waiting for: Anthony 'The Quarterback Turned Defensive Dynamo' Richardson!" The crowd's buzzing with curiosity, half-expecting him to call an audible and throw the first-ever defensive Hail Mary.   Surprisingly, Richardson doesn't completely embarrass himself. Sure, he's stumbling through reads and tackles like he's reading a foreign language, but he manages to make a few plays that even Latu would nod approvingly at. It's like watching a midlife crisis turn into a midgame surprise.   So here's to Anthony Richardson, the quarterback who found himself on the other side of the line of scrimmage. Who knows, maybe this season will be the comeback story to end all comeback stories. Or maybe we'll just get more memes than tackles. Either way, it's gonna be one heck of a ride.   Keep grinding, AKB
    • I'm not certain if we are bringing in another safety. Do you understand now?????? The other guy thought we would. I said I'm not certain 
    • Funny. I created a thread a while back that completely discredits this notion that he’s a running back…    He’s a pocket passer. Who runs on designed calls. Check the tape. 
    • All funny stuff @AKB and good fodder to stir up conversations during this dead period.   AR at RB?  I don't want to be "that guy" but if he gets injured every time someone touches him, or he lands wrong... his career isn't going to last too long at RB.   Now, maybe at D End????
  • Members

    • bellevuecolt

      bellevuecolt 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • G8R

      G8R 57

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • krunk

      krunk 8,431

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • AKB

      AKB 5,272

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Fluke_33

      Fluke_33 5,095

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jvan1973

      jvan1973 11,066

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Coltsfan1953

      Coltsfan1953 201

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Gyworks

      Gyworks 13

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • PureLuck

      PureLuck 274

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • RollerColt

      RollerColt 12,665

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...