Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

1St Pick In The Draft Should Be Cb


Recommended Posts

We did not resign Hayden, he plays for the Falcons now. This is my point. We took Marlin Jackson with a #1 pick at the end of the round, more like a #2. To pay a Corner for top 15 money is stupid for the Colts. Polian drafts strategically so that we offset the veterans when they leave in free agency because he knows he has no interest in resigning for big money. Instead, we are a franchise that invests heavily in key areas... ie QB, because we only keep the positions that matter. So tell me now why putting our eggs in a sure thing with Luck as #1 is stupid, when if we get multiple picks in the first round and can't resign them, and we lose all of that in 3 years when free-agency comes. We try to develop role-players and build them around our amazing offense; and to continue that philosophy we will be selecting Luck as #1 pick.

Wait what? I didn't really understand that. In 2009, we resigned Kelvin Hayden to a 5 year, $43 million contract or something like that. We probably overpayed him a little, but if he stays healthy most of the time then it's still a pretty good deal. We released him because he couldn't stay healthy for what he was getting paid, same with Bob Sanders.

You act like CB's are not important in our defense? Tell that to Jacob Lacey and Terrance Johnson, guys who love to get burned by more physically talented WR's. Sorry, but CB's our important in ANY defense, and even more so in ours now because we are playing more man to man coverage. Don't believe me about the man to man coverage? Go watch the Chiefs game and you'll see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 140
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

We did not resign Hayden, he plays for the Falcons now. This is my point. We took Marlin Jackson with a #1 pick at the end of the round, more like a #2. To pay a Corner for top 15 money is stupid for the Colts. Polian drafts strategically so that we offset the veterans when they leave in free agency because he knows he has no interest in resigning for big money. Instead, we are a franchise that invests heavily in key areas... ie QB, because we only keep the positions that matter. So tell me now why putting our eggs in a sure thing with Luck as #1 is stupid, when if we get multiple picks in the first round and can't resign them, and we lose all of that in 3 years when free-agency comes. We try to develop role-players and build them around our amazing offense; and to continue that philosophy we will be selecting Luck as #1 pick.

We won't make the same mistake of relying so heavily on a QB, that we can't build a team around him.

Manning was able to win, but we are now seeing just how many holes he covers. Luck will NEVER be capable of the same level of QB play. No one is. We will not put our eggs in the Luck basket, unless we are stupid, or we get him for nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We won't make the same mistake of relying so heavily on a QB, that we can't build a team around him.

Manning was able to win, but we are now seeing just how many holes he covers. Luck will NEVER be capable of the same level of QB play. No one is. We will not put our eggs in the Luck basket, unless we are stupid, or we get him for nothing.

Well, i guess we will just be bottom dwellers for the next 15 years... Which will be sad, but since i live in Michigan recently, i guess i better get used to cheering for the lions. cheers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:facepalm:

Oh its you again Jason. Here is my quote just for you, the colt in denial:

"There are 2 types of Colts fans right now. There is one group that knows the future is with Luck. And then there are those who are in denial; thinking Manning can recover from a career-ending neck injury."

Edited by super8todd
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh its you again Jason. Here is my quote just for you, the colt in denial:

"There are 2 types of Colts fans right now. There is one group that knows the future is with Luck. And then there are those who are in denial; thinking Manning can recover from a career-ending neck injury."

Your quote is just stupid....no idea who said it and I don't really care. I'm not in denial about anything. You seem to be in denial of the fact that there just may be a few other QB's that have just as much a chance of NFL success as Luck has. I'm not convinced, like you seem to be, that Luck is the only option, and I'm also not convinced he's even the best option for us. If you think that he is, then that's great, that's your opinion. But to think that without Luck we are doomed to dwell in the NFL cellar for the next 15 years is just sad and amazingly naive.

Edited by Jason
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your quote is just stupid....no idea who said it and I don't really care. I'm not in denial about anything. You seem to be in denial of the fact that there just may be a few other QB's that have just as much a chance of NFL success as Luck has. I'm not convinced, like you seem to be, that Luck is the only option, and I'm also not convinced he's even the best option for us. If you think that he is, then that's great, that's your opinion. But to think that without Luck we are doomed to dwell in the NFL cellar for the next 15 years is just sad and amazingly naive.

You know, for someone that says my quote is stupid, I've read the blog where your quote came from... you are missing the most important part of your quote, which says that we should cut Manning if we take Luck to 'learn' from Manning. Which i disagree with, but you aren't properly displaying the entire version of the quote you lifted, just cherry picking the part YOU like, just like a politician with something to hide..

Nevertheless, we disagree on one thing. But my opinion isn't naive, we are facing the future right now without Manning, and that seems to be working out really well for our team this season. Get used to it, because we need a 50/50 QB rotation next season or we will be bottom dwellers is all im saying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And I only say... bottom dwellers because we didnt take Luck of course. Maybe i should just cheer for the team that does take him, because they are going to be the winners.

All I can say is it is really sad if you truly believe that Luck is the only chance we have at future success. I mean, what happens if we don't even get the #1 pick?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know, for someone that says my quote is stupid, I've read the blog where your quote came from... you are missing the most important part of your quote, which says that we should cut Manning if we take Luck to 'learn' from Manning. Which i disagree with, but you aren't properly displaying the entire version of the quote you lifted, just cherry picking the part YOU like, just like a politician with something to hide..

Nevertheless, we disagree on one thing. But my opinion isn't naive, we are facing the future right now without Manning, and that seems to be working out really well for our team this season. Get used to it, because we need a 50/50 QB rotation next season or we will be bottom dwellers is all im saying.

What on earth are you talking about? I didn't lift any quote. I directly quoted your post...YOU are the one who lifted the quote from whatever blog you're talking about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All I can say is it is really sad if you truly believe that Luck is the only chance we have at future success. I mean, what happens if we don't even get the #1 pick?

Then we better start looking at Matt Barkley. I didn't realize the severity of Manning's injury until i looked it up. No one has recovered from it.. no one knows that. This is why Manning is getting experimental stem-cell therapy from Europe. It is a debilitating career-ending injury, Manning is going to have the fight of his life just to be 50%. So we really need a QB to take his load off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What on earth are you talking about? I didn't lift any quote. I directly quoted your post...YOU are the one who lifted the quote from whatever blog you're talking about.

You misunderstood; i am talking about This Quote of Yours:

If Manning is healthy, he's going to play for 4 to 5 more years. It's too soon to take Luck to 'learn' from Manning. This option makes the least sense. It's probably the most popular among fans and pundits, but it's pure unadulterated stupidity. It will ruin the franchise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You misunderstood; i am talking about This Quote of Yours:

If Manning is healthy, he's going to play for 4 to 5 more years. It's too soon to take Luck to 'learn' from Manning. This option makes the least sense. It's probably the most popular among fans and pundits, but it's pure unadulterated stupidity. It will ruin the franchise.

Ah, ok yes I did misunderstand. However, regardless of whether Manning plays 1 more year or 5 more years, my trade down stance doesn't change. And you no more know that Manning never will return than the author of that blog knows that Manning will return. I've said this numerous times, that things obviously change to some extent if, come draft day, the Colts FO knows that Manning will never return.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah, ok yes I did misunderstand. However, regardless of whether Manning plays 1 more year or 5 more years, my trade down stance doesn't change. And you no more know that Manning never will return than the author of that blog knows that Manning will return. I've said this numerous times, that things obviously change to some extent if, come draft day, the Colts FO knows that Manning will never return.

I respect your opinion, Maybe getting multiple draft picks could be better.. but we are just in such a bad position with Manning. I hope I'm wrong about Manning, and that he gets to play another 5+ years. But either way, we need another decent QB to take his 4th quarters and possibly some 3rd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I respect your opinion, Maybe getting multiple draft picks could be better.. but we are just in such a bad position with Manning. I hope I'm wrong about Manning, and that he gets to play another 5+ years. But either way, we need another decent QB to take his 4th quarters and possibly some 3rd.

And I've got no problem with that at all. I think there are a number of college prospects that can be franchise QB's, especially after a year or 2 with Manning. I mean look how Painter is playing. No he's not spectacular and he's made some mistakes but for only having 3 career starts he's doing very well. So that said, even if the Colts don't draft a QB at all, Painter can step in during those 4th quarters you're talking about and still manage the game and close it out. However if the Colts do draft a QB, like I said there are a number who have just as much physical talent and have at least comparable intelligence. Personally I really would love to see the Colts draft Nick Foles. I think he has a ton of potential and would be a bargain even at the top of the second round but due to the number of QB's he may be available at the top of the 3rd.

This way you have the best of both worlds...a very talented young QB who will gain from the benefit of working with Manning, but you also get as many draft picks as possible to both A) give Manning and the other core of vets on the team (Mathis, Wayne, Saturday, Clark, Freeney) as much help as possible to try to win another ring or 2 in their final years and B) create a better overall team for the new QB to inherit and having the best team around him is the easiest way to ease him into the pro game and give him the best chance for success. Plus the future additional draft picks that also help to build a better overall team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I highly disagree with the statement in red. Angerer, Moala, Nevis, Castonzo, Ijalana (in what little we got to see of him), Collie, Garcon (definitely talented but the drops are killers), Conner, Wheeler, and Carter are all very talented players.

moala is a bum....and wheeler has been awful for the most part.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then we better start looking at Matt Barkley. I didn't realize the severity of Manning's injury until i looked it up. No one has recovered from it.. no one knows that. This is why Manning is getting experimental stem-cell therapy from Europe. It is a debilitating career-ending injury, Manning is going to have the fight of his life just to be 50%. So we really need a QB to take his load off.

You seem to think that we NEED to take a Qb with our 1st pick. We don't. We'll figure something out in the future. Even if we do take Luck we'll still be "bottom dwellers" for what? The next 5 or so years with him because we weren't smart enough to fix the atrocious defense. And omg peytons surgery MIGHT be career-threatening, not IS career-threatening. Please stop with that. *asked nicely*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you even watch the games? Kavel Conner has been awful in pass coverage, which everyone knows, while you have no proof that Wheeler has been terrible at anything...

??? do even read? where did i say anything about conner? and until this year wheeler has been awful.....go watch tapes from previous years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

??? do even read? where did i say anything about conner? and until this year wheeler has been awful.....go watch tapes from previous years.

Did I say I was talking about previous years? I thought you meant Wheeler has been horrible for the most part this year.

And I still don't understand why people hate on Philip Wheeler. He wasn't any worse last year than Angerer was at SLB. Angerer couldn't take down a guy bigger than 200 lbs. last year without getting dragged for a first down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did I say I was talking about previous years? I thought you meant Wheeler has been horrible for the most part this year.

And I still don't understand why people hate on Philip Wheeler. He wasn't any worse last year than Angerer was at SLB. Angerer couldn't take down a guy bigger than 200 lbs. last year without getting dragged for a first down.

no, wheeler has been quite the surprise this year. i am admittedly shocked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Think he is saying odds are better then zero he starts which leaves us in a range from .1 to 99.9...lol
    • I read that .... then reread it.......   Are you saying that he is a guaranteed starter?   Or there is no chance that he is the starter?   Its early, I havent finished my coffee.....  It might be my denseness       Goncalves would seem to have a real chance at RG.... IMHO  
    • A couple things that took place last year and throughout the off-season that I think will pay dividends this year on the defensive side of the ball.   Brents and Jones showed, in spurts, that they have the chops to play CB in this league and with a full season under their belt plus this off-season I think they will be a very solid tandem on the outside. Add in Flowers and his growth potential and a versatile rookie in Simpson I think the CB room is just fine and ready for the next step. Will they end up with more INT's and PBU's - I certainly think so.   Another coverage area that I think has improved is a full season and off-season of learning the LB spot for Ronnie Harrison and then the drafting of Jaylon Carlies and the singing of the UDFA Craig Young. All are former Safety's that have or had made the transition to LB and bring coverage skills with them and LONG arms - all three have 33" arms or longer which means wingspan and shutting down passing lanes. If the coaching staff isn't married to playing Zaire (Contract) and Speed (Veteran) on passing downs, then 2-3 of those fella's could play in sub packages and clog up passing lanes. They did cut bait with Shaq last year so I would hope that they play the kids that can actually cover versus the highest paid fella.   The addition of Latu, though he is just one man should also help speed up the QB's eyes and lead to more errant throws that could be picked off!??!   All three of those things tied together create a perfect storm of improvement in the weakest areas of our D last year.   As for Safety - I have mixed feelings about the FS spot and there are several 'what if' scenarios:   Cross could have something click and then the mental game meets up with his physical ability - which I feel like he played decent down the stretch last year (last 2-3 games)?   Thomas could return to his rookie form.   Daniel Scott could be a pretty good option but is also technically a rookie after sitting out all last year - though mental reps and walk throughs do help from time to time.   A really off the wall thought - perhaps they move Harrison back to SS and slide Blackmon to FS if the kids (Carlies & Young) prove capable as nickel and dime coverage backers?   Denbow is not the answer....... Dabo will be on year three of using the International Roster Exception..... Maybe they try Ameer Speed at FS with his size and speed combination? Maybe his college teammate Kendall Brooks earns a spot? Maybe Abraham or Simpson take FS and run with it? Both played that spot in college. Maybe Abraham proves he can play the NB and they slide Moore back to FS like he played in college?   Lots and lots of ifs and buts.........
    • Good question    Wiki simply says he's nicknamed AD, I wonder if it had to do with Hebrew pronunciation of the word Adonai, which means Lord.. maybe, it's just that his family or friends started calling him AD  
    • Fever get their 1st win over the Sparks. Clark hit a couple of 3s from real deep. 1 sealed the game late in the 4th.
  • Members

    • Creekside

      Creekside 778

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Aaron86

      Aaron86 440

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TheRadiantAerynSun

      TheRadiantAerynSun 6

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Architects08

      Architects08 284

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • GwinnettColt

      GwinnettColt 236

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • bellevuecolt

      bellevuecolt 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • holeymoley99

      holeymoley99 2,672

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IndyEV

      IndyEV 96

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Powerslave

      Powerslave 61

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...