Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Possibly Trade with Jets


Recommended Posts

  Colts give up 3rd pick this year for Jets:

 

2018 1st round ( #6 )

2018 2nd round ( #50 )

2018 4th round ( #102 )

2019 2nd round ( #est 15-20)

would you do it? Considering the Jets could pick higher than 15-20 next year, I’d strongly consider it. 

Thoughts?

 

here’s the link 

https://www.google.com/amp/s/articles.nj.com/jets/index.ssf/2018/01/what_would_it_cost_jets_to_trade_for_colts_no_3_nf.amp

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, coltsfeva said:

  Colts give up 3rd pick this year for Jets:

 

2018 1st round ( #6 )

2018 2nd round ( #50 )

2018 4th round ( #102 )

2019 2nd round ( #est 15-20)

would you do it? Considering the Jets could pick higher than 15-20 next year, I’d strongly consider it. 

Thoughts?

 

here’s the link 

https://www.google.com/amp/s/articles.nj.com/jets/index.ssf/2018/01/what_would_it_cost_jets_to_trade_for_colts_no_3_nf.amp

 

They have 2 second rounders this year (one from Seattle) , the trade for me would have to include them both + swapping first round picks, and if there is a bidding war, for our pick I want them to overpay by giving us their 3rd as well....so we would essentially add an extra 2-seconds  and 3rd for moving back 3 spots....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Based upon that article I think Ballard could ask for a bit more since there will be other teams possibly competing to move up for a franchise QB as well. 

 

If Ballard thinks Bradley Chubb, Fitzpatrick, or Nelson will still be there at 6 which I believe at least 2 of those players will be, you should get all you can get from the Jets or Broncos to move down. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, BProland85 said:

Based upon that article I think Ballard could ask for a bit more since there will be other teams possibly competing to move up for a franchise QB as well. 

 

If Ballard thinks Bradley Chubb, Fitzpatrick, or Nelson will still be there at 6 which I believe at least 2 of those players will be, you should get all you can get from the Jets or Broncos to move down. 

Totally agree. If the gold mine is opened up, you do it. But not past the Jets. The drop down is small and the reward shoukd be high. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is ideal if there is a bidding war for a QB at #3.  

 

This is more likely to happen if the Browns try to get Barkley at #1.  But honestly I don't see that happening.  I think the Browns will take their favorite QB at #1, the Giants will take one at 2 (Although if they decide to stick to Manning they could also trade down.).  Then #3 could be a bidding war for Barkley.  Wouldn't be a lucrative as a bidding war for a QB, but might still bring in a good haul.  

 

I would certainly be happy to take a deal similar to the trade mentioned here.  Trade down to #6, grab Nelson.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Valpo2004 said:

It is ideal if there is a bidding war for a QB at #3.  

 

This is more likely to happen if the Browns try to get Barkley at #1.  But honestly I don't see that happening.  I think the Browns will take their favorite QB at #1, the Giants will take one at 2 (Although if they decide to stick to Manning they could also trade down.).  Then #3 could be a bidding war for Barkley.  Wouldn't be a lucrative as a bidding war for a QB, but might still bring in a good haul.  

 

I would certainly be happy to take a deal similar to the trade mentioned here.  Trade down to #6, grab Nelson.  

 

Yeah I think we’ll get decent offers even if QBs go 1,2. Barkley is a rare talent at RB and he could garner interest from another team as could Allen/Mayfield if they continue to rise. I would prefer Chubb at 6 overall but wouldn’t be too upset with Nelson if he was gone. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, BProland85 said:

 

Yeah I think we’ll get decent offers even if QBs go 1,2. Barkley is a rare talent at RB and he could garner interest from another team as could Allen/Mayfield if they continue to rise. I would prefer Chubb at 6 overall but wouldn’t be too upset with Nelson if he was gone. 

 

Yeah he's not going to bring in the haul that a QB could but he's pretty much universally agreed to be the best player in the draft.  So any team hungry to get a guy in their backfield that can make plays in both the running and passing game would probably be interested in trading up to get him.

 

That is presuming Ballard doesn't grab him himself.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I agree with you.  Now is not the time for doing anything that could potentially cause injury.
    • I'm gonna defend @CR91 on this one.   The Colts offensive line has the potential to be a top-5 line.  If everyone plays to their potential.  Their tippy-top. However... Ryan Kelly has already seen his best years.  He's still a stout, capable center.  But let's not fool ourselves.  His trajectory is down, not up.  Nothing wrong with it.  It's just the natural curve of a player who has been in the league this long. Nelson isn't quite the world beater that he started out as.  Yes, he could regain that level of play.  And I hope he does!  But until he does, his level is good-but-not-great.  If we're being honest. Raimann made great strides.  And there's still room for him to improve!  However, my assessment is his ceiling is Anthony Costanzo:  Solid and reliable, without ever making a pro bowl. Will Fries has yet to prove to me that he is truly starter material.  He's the best of what we have at RG, for the moment.  And we just drafted a couple of guys who could challenge him for a starting role -- this year. I love Smith.  He's done everything we asked him to do.  Except stay healthy.   If everything works out, and the line plays to their top potential, they'll be a top OL in the league.  But if we're talking about predictions rather than potential, I see them at the upper end of middle.  Nothing to be unhappy about!  Especially after the debacle '22 season.  But I'm ok with predicting them to be "average".
    • They are trash compared to their peers at the NFL level that are also starters at their position. I thought this was obvious. Not sure why you are comparing them to me. Just like I mention with Ballard, they are not competing against me or any "fan", they are compared to other starting TEs at the NFL level. Most of which are better than them. I don't sugercoat things. Any of our TE's would be considered a bottom 5 TE starter in the NFL. That's just a fact. Every team is weak at certain positions. One of our weaknesses is TE, and yes, they are trash relative to the other starting TEs in the NFL.
    • imo your post was very realistic and some posters on here just like to call other posters names and make snide remarks to whatever you say, this makes them feel important, I dont respond to their name calling and snide remarks and feed their self importance
  • Members

    • Yoshinator

      Yoshinator 9,473

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • SaturdayAllDay

      SaturdayAllDay 317

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CR91

      CR91 12,871

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • bellevuecolt

      bellevuecolt 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...