Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Moving forward, Are we completely comfortable with the Offensive play calling


Rackeen305

Recommended Posts

On 1/26/2017 at 0:41 PM, Rackeen305 said:

Ok, Yes we will have a new GM. However, with a new GM comes new players, and whether to keep key players (Frank Gore). Regardless of who we have on the roster, Are we completely comfortable with the play calling/packages that we run. Players wont change the results of a 4th and 1 situation, where the Colts call a screen. I just don't get it. How will the GM or can the new GM affect these instances of horrible play calling?

 

This is the question. An organizational philosophy that is effective in key situations.

-You must get positive yards on 1st and 10

-You have to convert on 3rd and less than 2

-Better yet, You cannot be in a situation where its 2nd and 18.

 

These are the plagues that seem to surround the colts. (offensively at least). Please reply with objective football reasoning. -Thanks! 

We had a back run for over 1000 yards I'm good with lkay calling 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 83
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

On 1/26/2017 at 7:59 PM, oldunclemark said:

Our problems are on defense.

I wouldn't judge coaches by individual play calls..

We rolled up a lot of yards and scored a lot of points..with 3 rookies in the O-line

 

 

Lets worry about the defense

Of course lets build the defense. That certainly wasnt my premise. That being said, It wasn't the defense that didnt come through down the stretch. Where we couldn't get the job done, converting the last 2 mins of games, or starting off games slow down by halftime. I.e. Jags @London L 30-27 (10/2), Texans @Indy  L 22-17 (12/11)..

 

That being said, just in case you lost count, this is Lucks 5th year. R. Wilson has been to the dance (superbowl) twice 1-1. I know the expectation is Luck not to be a Philip Rivers type QB? Ijs...(your turn)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 26/1/2017 at 10:23 PM, Superman said:

 

Brady helps. He and Belichick have been together forever, and they're two of the brightest people in the league. McDaniels being back helps. He grew up in the New England culture, and they all seem to speak the same language.

 

Their offense has changed a lot over the years, but really, once Charlie Weis left and Brady came into his own as a veteran QB, the offense has become an extension of Brady, and Belichick's influence is obvious. 

 

They do this on defense and special teams, also. Their gameplans vary widely from week to week, as opposed to the typical NFL approach of 'this is what we do, let's get good at it, and we'll live and die by it.' More and more staffs are embracing a more adaptable approach, but New England is just another animal. That's why Brady throws the ball 50 times for 367 yards and they only have 14 rushing yards against Baltimore, then the next week they run for 177 yards against the Colts. 

 

It seems like common sense, but it's a lot easier said than done. Having the same coach and QB for the last 16 years helps.

 

Yeah, but at least you can make it your ambition to reach that peak. Probably not more difficult than to win a SB. That is a long term project too.

 

Get busy living or get busy dying. 

:rock:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Well….  The Dodgers did draft Liatu.  So they clearly wanted more DE talent.     And next season (25) I expect all DE’s back.     Liatu, Ebukam, Dayo, Paye and Lewis.  I’d be disappointed if they’re not.  
    • That's very reasonable. What is the name of the course?
    • I was on the pick up payes option train.  I’ve actually said on this board I’d want Paye back (at the right price).  So we agree there.   In response to what you’ve said, this is what I’m getting at.  I said that Paye was solid against the run and maybe solid is not giving him enough credit, I’ll give you that one.  But what I’m saying is does being just good against the run warrants not giving snaps to other players who have performed better in pass situations?  Despite Payes overall stats improving yearly, his pressure rate has declined in 3 straight years and he played 16 games last year.  Good/solid against the run and above avg against the pass in this scheme is going to standout.     Once again, how good is Paye at the run that we let other defensive ends who have better pressure rates (ie. Lewis) sit on the sideline?  I don’t want this to sound like I’m crapping on qwitty because he’s a solid player.  What I’m saying is that I do think we can use an upgrade and the colts did also.  Now who goes to the sidelines between Ebukam or Paye, that’s for them two to figure out, but my money is on Paye.     So am I saying he’s bad against the run, no.  A bad player, no.  IMO is his run defense good enough to not at least try and see what we have with other DEs who can pass rush better, nope.  
    • How many Mulligans do we get? I may need an unlimited amount!
    • And yet, didn’t the Colts pick up Paye's 5th year option?      Most posts here complain Paye isn’t a good enough pass rusher.  Now here you are saying he’s not a good enough run defender.      What do the Colts know about Paye that the fan base here does not appear to?    
  • Members

    • Dunk

      Dunk 1,418

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • compuls1v3

      compuls1v3 1,999

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Hoose

      Hoose 1,988

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Coltsfan1953

      Coltsfan1953 204

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • MikeCurtis

      MikeCurtis 4,696

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Solid84

      Solid84 6,927

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • horseshoepower

      horseshoepower 33

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IinD

      IinD 4,527

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nate!

      Nate! 593

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 21,609

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...