vinsanity Posted September 3, 2014 Share Posted September 3, 2014 What do you guys think? With defense coming along, could be very comparable, especially in the offensive skilled positions 3 capable WRs with possible 1000 yards each.Fitz vs WayneBoldin vs NicksBreaston vs Hilton RBHightower, Edge vs Bradshaw, TRich TECould prove themselves as reliable red zone targets Food for thought I suppose Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superman Posted September 3, 2014 Share Posted September 3, 2014 What do you guys think? With defense coming along, could be very comparable, especially in the offensive skilled positions 3 capable WRs with possible 1000 yards each.Fitz vs WayneBoldin vs NicksBreaston vs Hilton RBHightower, Edge vs Bradshaw, TRich TECould prove themselves as reliable red zone targets Food for thought I suppose Fitzgerald was probably the best receiver in the league that year, and definitely in the playoffs. So they were better than us at the top of the WR corps, but I think our #3, whoever it is, is better than Breaston was. I also think our TEs are much better. Backs might be a push, but that's to be determined. The main difference is that Kurt Warner was on his way to a HOF worthy end of his career, with incredible accuracy and greater efficiency than Luck has shown to this point in his career. So this is a very ambitious comparison, to say the least. If Luck plays QB the way Warner did in 2008, then we'll all be very happy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smonroe Posted September 3, 2014 Share Posted September 3, 2014 Fitzgerald was probably the best receiver in the league that year, and definitely in the playoffs. So they were better than us at the top of the WR corps, but I think our #3, whoever it is, is better than Breaston was. I also think our TEs are much better. Backs might be a push, but that's to be determined. The main difference is that Kurt Warner was on his way to a HOF worthy end of his career, with incredible accuracy and greater efficiency than Luck has shown to this point in his career. So this is a very ambitious comparison, to say the least. If Luck plays QB the way Warner did in 2008, then we'll all be very happy. They're (Zona) a classic example of how anything can happen in the playoffs and the best team in the league doesn't always win it. They easily could have won that game. The Ravens are another example with their last SB. The only comparison with them that I want to happen is getting hot in January (and February). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RomanianColtsFan Posted September 3, 2014 Share Posted September 3, 2014 God, I hope our defense doesn't get torched like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Pelley Posted September 4, 2014 Share Posted September 4, 2014 Don't forget to mention the aging quarterback who was seemingly past his prime, before having an outstanding season. Luck = Warner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTC Posted September 4, 2014 Share Posted September 4, 2014 Luck > Warner Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ColtsBlueFL Posted September 4, 2014 Share Posted September 4, 2014 Luck > WarnerReally? That is likely a premature comparison- http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap1000000373865/article/hall-of-fame-class-of-2015-forecast-kurt-warner-makes-the-cut I hope he does make it in. A late start but two very productive runs with two teams. To me, MVP is more than stat stuffing over a great number of years... but doing that helps too. Hopefully down the road, Luck shows even better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now