Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Conversations are moderated for civility. We ask that you please stay on topic. For more info, see our Community Guidelines ×
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

So...ummm Seattle clinched home field advantage?

bap1331

By bap1331
in NFL General

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 172
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

TAPLOOK Walk On

TAPLOOK

Posted
Posted

Do i really need to say? Its luck of course. Wilson is a game manager punk, let's be honest.

Honestly we see different things when watching the games.

 

 

There are close to 30 teams that wish they has such a manager. That's a good system in Seattle. Maybe some other teams will emulate it next season. It is a copy cat league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
House Walk On

House

Posted
Posted

Yes but the eye test is even bigger.

Your standards of a long shot are extraordinarily low.

The eye test does reveal a lot though. It reveals one guy on an extremely talented team top to bottom. And another who is on a team with holes everywhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TAPLOOK Walk On

TAPLOOK

Posted
Posted

Your standards of a long shot are extraordinarily low.

The eye test does reveal a lot though. It reveals one guy on an extremely talented team top to bottom. And another who is on a team with holes everywhere.

 

Same 15 year old argument. You should tweet Irsay about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
House Walk On

House

Posted
Posted

Nothing impacts a team more than a QB. Just look at Brady this year as proof positive.

Perfect example. Bad D, bad running, and bad WRs didn't effect Brady early this year? Thanks for the help on that one.

I better go apologize to that Baltimore D back in 2000. I was crediting them incorrectly in that SB season. Whereas I should have been crediting Trent Dilfer. As he had the greatest impact of all.

Oh man I have to apologize to the Buccaneers too....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TAPLOOK Walk On

TAPLOOK

Posted
Posted

Perfect example. Bad D, bad running, and bad WRs didn't effect Brady early this year? Thanks for the help on that one.

I better go apologize to that Baltimore D back in 2000. I was crediting them incorrectly in that SB season. Whereas I should have been crediting Trent Dilfer. As he had the greatest impact of all.

Oh man I have to apologize to the Buccaneers too....

And yet through it all the Patriots are 9-3. Why? Because they have a great QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TAPLOOK Walk On

TAPLOOK

Posted
Posted

Yes. A great veteran QB. Who even as great as he is, struggled around a bad team.

Correct. Glad we agree bad teams can bring down even the best QB.

When did they bring down Brady? They're 9-3 despite Mayo, Wilfork, Kelly, Denard, Hernandez, Vollmer, Gronk, Vereen and Welker. All gone, out for the season or missed significant time. And I left some out. They are winning. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
House Walk On

House

Posted
Posted

When did they bring down Brady? They're 9-3 despite Mayo, Wilfork, Kelly, Denard, Hernandez, Vollmer, Gronk, Vereen and Welker. All gone, out for the season or missed significant time. And I left some out. They are winning.

I was unaware you can't win games if a QB struggles. Interesting.

If you want to put your fingers in your ears and pretend Tom didn't struggle earlier this year when the offensive injuries were at their worst, more power to you.

I mean you're wrong, but got to respect someone who's willing to stick to their guns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bluebambi Walk On

bluebambi

Posted
Posted

The saints have the 2nd best record so even if they go to the AFC championship. They will go back to Seattle. Not only that, I don't see any NFC teams going to Seattle to beat them there. Here are the possible teams:

-Cardinals

-49ers

-Lions

-Panthers(closest chance)

-Cowboys (LOL! Romo will be paranoid from last time)

-Philly

-Chicago(maybe!)

-Green Bay

-Giants(best chance...they can beat anyone)

Well pretty much it's closed up, Sea hawks vs the best AFC team...

the Seahawks go to the afc championship game ? That would be a fun twist
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TAPLOOK Walk On

TAPLOOK

Posted
Posted

I was unaware you can't win games if a QB struggles. Interesting.

If you want to put your fingers in your ears and pretend Tom didn't struggle earlier this year when the offensive injuries were at their worst, more power to you.

I mean you're wrong, but got to respect someone who's willing to stick to their guns.

Wrong? He's still struggling but getting much better. The only reason they were winning was because of him. With a lesser QB/LEADER the team would have folded before the season started. I give the coach much credit as well. YES they win because of BB and Brady. Put those two in Texas or Indy for example and they're competing for a SB THIS season. Without them not so much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
House Walk On

House

Posted
Posted

I was unaware you can't win games if a QB struggles. Interesting.

If you want to put your fingers in your ears and pretend Tom didn't struggle earlier this year when the offensive injuries were at their worst, more power to you.

I mean you're wrong, but got to respect someone who's willing to stick to their guns.

Wrong? He's still struggling but getting much better. The only reason they were winning was because of him. With a lesser QB/LEADER the team would have folded before the season started. I give the coach much credit as well. YES they win because of BB and Brady. Put those two in Texas or Indy for example and they're competing for a SB THIS season. Without them not so much.

lmao I like how you're twisting this to be a discussion about wins when we are talking about stats, and how a subpar team can affect the stats of a QB.

Wilson far better than Brady this year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TAPLOOK Walk On

TAPLOOK

Posted
Posted

lmao I like how you're twisting this to be a discussion about wins when we are talking about stats, and how a subpar team can affect the stats of a QB.

Wilson far better than Brady this year?

Stats? As a great coach once said (The greatest in fact)"Stats are for losers".

Winning is for winners.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TAPLOOK Walk On

TAPLOOK

Posted
Posted

So you're a loser for comparing Wilson's stats to Luck's to make the argument he's far better?

You're an odd fellow, but whatever floats your boat.

I liked Wilson before I even looked at those stats. Plus Dusty said Luck was better than Wilson when he's clearly not. You can use a stat to back a point but not to make one. Brady wins without stats. Who else does that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dustin Walk On

Dustin

Posted
Posted

I liked Wilson before I even looked at those stats. Plus Dusty said Luck was better than Wilson when he's clearly not. You can use a stat to back a point but not to make one. Brady wins without stats. Who else does that?

When did I say that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
House Walk On

House

Posted
Posted

I liked Wilson before I even looked at those stats. Plus Dusty said Luck was better than Wilson when he's clearly not. You can use a stat to back a point but not to make one. Brady wins without stats. Who else does that?

Luck does that since apparently his stats don't impress you, yet he wins lmao.

Also Tim Tebow, but let's keep that Pandora's box closed shall we?

I do believe your quote was that stats are for losers. Not "Stats are only for loser if they aren't backing something up with them."

Wilson is better than Brady cuz stats. Logic.

You are trying though. Like I said. There is something admirable about what it is you do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TAPLOOK Walk On

TAPLOOK

Posted
Posted

Luck does that since apparently his stats don't impress you, yet he wins lmao.

Also Tim Tebow, but let's keep that Pandora's box closed shall we?

I do believe your quote was that stats are for losers. Not "Stats are only for loser if they aren't backing something up with them."

Wilson is better than Brady cuz stats. Logic.

You are trying though. Like I said. There is something admirable about what it is you do.

Luck and the Colts are mediocre. I would take Wilson over Brady in a heartbeat at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • GoColts8818
      How to Beat the Texans (and every other team)

      By GoColts8818 · Posted

      I wasn’t being serious.  That’s why I included the smiley face at the end.
    • AwesomeAustin
      How to Beat the Texans (and every other team)

      By AwesomeAustin · Posted

      Ballard has been saying it for years that the trenches are where it’s at. Doesn’t matter what era of football has been around, you control the line of scrimmage and you control the game. He has accomplished it on the O side of the ball but has tried for years to get a DL that can do the same. I think we will see it come together this year and into the next two. 
    • AwesomeAustin
      Harrison Played Mostly At Safety In Mini Camp.

      By AwesomeAustin · Posted

      Harrison, Cross, Blackmon and Thomas is not a terrible group. Someone obviously needs to step up and play beside Blackmon at his level. I think there is enough ability with those four to roll with them into training camp and see what happens. 
    • smittywerb
      How to Beat the Texans (and every other team)

      By smittywerb · Posted

      Pass rush.     That is the key.  Control the line.  Make him make plays.  Make him uncomfortable.  Hey, if he Stroud beats us with his talent and we’re making him complete these great plays, then chalk it up to the game.  But we can’t allow him (and any other qb) to be comfortable and pick us apart.     I hope we see our front 4 provide that pressure because that will make everything else much easier.  I honestly believe we have the corners for our scheme in Moore, Brents, and jones.  But we don’t have the pressure.  Or the FS unfortunately.  Our corners jobs in this scheme isn’t to run step for step with wide receivers.  It’s to stick with them and prevent YAC.  Moore is the best nickel in the game, Jones was one of the best corners PERIOD in preventing YAC, and I think a healthy Brents will be good too.
    • smittywerb
      Colts Select Laiatu Latu Edge UCLA

      By smittywerb · Posted

      Agreed.  After this last off season, I kind of give Ballard a pass on taking long to find a certified DE (if Latu pans out).  Like QBs, they don’t grow on trees.  You either have to draft one high, get lucky with one in the draft, or sign one in FA for loads of cash.  All I can ask for him as GM to do is try.  He hasn’t been perfect by any means but at least he’s tried with the DE position specifically.   i also think Shane being here has changed his thinking.  Before, Ballard might’ve went with Turner due to the higher upside.  But maybe Shane differs and wants proven players.     Either way, I’m glad we possibly have our stud at a premium position for the next 5 years at a cheap rate.     And gotta thank the Falcons for us landing Latu.  Lol

  • Members

    • krunk

      krunk 8,432

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TheNewGuy

      TheNewGuy 87

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ADnum1

      ADnum1 3,210

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dingus McGirt

      Dingus McGirt 3,686

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • The Brazilian Ninja

      The Brazilian Ninja 105

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Solon

      Solon 206

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Introspect

      Introspect 346

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...