Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Interesting Prospect..


Recommended Posts

I'd say the biggest problem with this prospect is that it's hard to know just how bad the competition is.   It looks really, really poor.

 

So, if he's dominating,  wouldn't you think he should?    He might have great physical tools that just needs a year on the PS to refine and be brought up to speed.

 

Here's a nice write-up on the kid, the good and the bad, from a draft site I know nothing about,  NFLmocks.com

 

http://nflmocks.com/2013/01/04/rontez-miles-2013-nfl-draft-scouting-report/

 

 

Based on tools alone, I'd give him a 7th round grade,  but he still might not get drafted.   If he tests well -- and he might, then maybe he climbs to a 6.   But I don't see him going higher than that.   Doesn't mean he won't.    Weird stuff can happen and it only takes one team to fall in love with you.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd say the biggest problem with this prospect is that it's hard to know just how bad the competition is.   It looks really, really poor.

 

So, if he's dominating,  wouldn't you think he should?    He might have great physical tools that just needs a year on the PS to refine and be brought up to speed.

 

Here's a nice write-up on the kid, the good and the bad, from a draft site I know nothing about,  NFLmocks.com

 

http://nflmocks.com/2013/01/04/rontez-miles-2013-nfl-draft-scouting-report/

 

 

Based on tools alone, I'd give him a 7th round grade,  but he still might not get drafted.   If he tests well -- and he might, then maybe he climbs to a 6.   But I don't see him going higher than that.   Doesn't mean he won't.    Weird stuff can happen and it only takes one team to fall in love with you.....

They said he went to Kent State but got kicked out due to academics, but I would just love to see what this guy is capable of against real comp. I think he might be a good late round pick up..based of talent alone..JMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I like about this prospect is he seems to be an Excellent tackler. When he makes contact with you he brings you down, and he does it with force. He seems to have pretty good instincts as well, although his speed seems to be only just a little above decent. Seems like a good candidate for Tampa 2/John Lynch type of player. Not sure if I'd give him as strong consideration for man to man/blitz scheme. I would consider him somewhere around round 6 through 7. I would have a little more confidence to take him in round 5 if he got a chance to play in something like the Senior Bowl or East West Shrine game and he competed well with guys on that level. He's definitely got potential I'll say that. He reminds me a lot of John Lynch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think we can give Stafford a little bit of credit. He's a fantastic QB. I think the QB-WR relationship is far more complex than many give credit. They both need each other to do the job well in order for the other to succeed.    Johnson, Kupp, Nacua. All 1,000 yard receivers. All played with Stafford. He knows how to get his star receivers the ball and put them into a position to succeed (YAC). It's why I was really wanting him to come to Indy years ago. 
    • ATL did not get Turner.  They eventually trade up in the second for an obscure 3T DT.    I read that The GM and HC wanted Latu, but the owner stepped in for Penix because he wanted a succession plan.  Read into that what you want.  Also, I guess since ATL seemed to want to trade up to 10 for Latu, its seems somebody wanted him pretty highly.   That's why there are also thoughts...don't get excited...that Ballard got a bit lucky with latu being there at 15.  Basically, the GMs had the 1st round pegged pretty well, then in swoops Blanc and reshuffles the playing deck for everyone.  LVR was mad too, because they wanted Penix at 13.  So if things would have gone to script....who knows who Ballard would have picked since Latu probably would not have been there.
    • It comes down to having a basic understanding of the broad buckets.  Generally, first rounders will be expected to play at a high NFL level sooner than the guy you pick in the third round, and then the guy you pick in the 5th round.  If the guy you pick in the 5th round steps up and plays well very soon, your team got the eval wrong and so did every other team.  If only one other team got it right, your wrongness that drove you to wait until round 5 made you miss your guy.     I think teams boards are different, but what team these days would not want a coverage LB that steps up right away.  All schemes can use that.  Same with a quick twitch corner with arms, a safety that can read and react, a WR that can run patterns, or always find the zone, and can catch (see Puca).  Its not like teams will reject these players because they are not perfect scheme fits.  If they think those guys can play well very soon, they go high on the boards.  Teams missed it with Puca too, unless you think his success is all because of McVay and Stafford.  IDK, seems like a stretch to me.
    • Is that how it went down? It was a curious move because they just paid Cousins a bag. But this approach worked pretty well for GB.   ATL's offense is pretty stacked and putting in a proven QB like Cousins will allow them to maximize and evaluate those pieces immediately. Meanwhile, Penix develops in the background. And they bought themselves 3 years to find out.     Plus, they did get Turner as well, who I think was their #1 target. 
    • I have to say, I do agree that a lot of GMs are on a similar level as far as skill and talent. That's how they got to where they are.    Some will be more inexperienced than others, some are more aggressive while others are passive. I think there are a lot of varying philosophies on running an NFL team compared to running a normal business.    I don't think everyone's board is the same. I'm sure there are some overlap especially at the top. But in the middle I would imagine it's far more varied. There's only so many scouts, so many days and hours, and thousands of players to evaluate. They aren't going to catch them all.    But, I will say there is always going to be some luck and chance probability involved when it comes to the draft. That's just a truth in life itself. 
  • Members

    • stitches

      stitches 19,760

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ChuggaBeer

      ChuggaBeer 1,783

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • B~Town

      B~Town 311

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • HungarianColtsFan

      HungarianColtsFan 889

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Jumpman

      Jumpman 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CR91

      CR91 12,739

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • fanoftheteam

      fanoftheteam 0

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • legend300

      legend300 140

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DoubleE Colt

      DoubleE Colt 341

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • chad72

      chad72 18,315

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...