PFF Scores week 9

[AKB]

so the grades confirm Jaylon Jones absolutely balled out. 

 

playing great, fantastic. If it weren't for Brents and Downs playing so well, he'd hands down be my favorite rookie.

 

I also think we have a sleeper TE in Mallory, waiting for his chance. 

 

I think Mallory would instantly get more production than pierce, overall, even split wide. 

 

maybe that last part deserves to go in the unpopular opinion thread, who knows

[AKB]

31 minutes ago, Nickster said:

Youre tough man.  Doing that from a phone is like a personal Chinese hell to me.  I’m not good at phones.

[Nickster]

7 hours ago, AKB said:

Shoot man I grew up in the 70s and 80s.  We still party way harder than these young whipper snappers lol.

[smittywerb]

I agree about the tight ends.  I think it’s because we really don’t have a do it all tight end.  Ogletree seems to find open spots well but he’s not a burner, or in other words someone who can beat a LB.  
 

The other tight ends do one thing and another thing not so good.  Whether that’s can get open but can’t block or vice versa.  
 

Woods seems to be another do it all tight end but he’s not healthy.  In the future, I see us going woods and ogletree as TE1 and 2

[Solid84]

10 hours ago, w87r said:

Crazy, took me almost 2 hours.

 

Probably should hop on the computer and do it but I just do it on my phone...

Bruh, you're crazy! 

 

I would've have noped out of that in an instant, props to you. 

[Solid84]

20 minutes ago, smittywerb said:

I agree about the tight ends.  I think it’s because we really don’t have a do it all tight end.  Ogletree seems to find open spots well but he’s not a burner, or in other words someone who can beat a LB.  
 

The other tight ends do one thing and another thing not so good.  Whether that’s can get open but can’t block or vice versa.  
 

Woods seems to be another do it all tight end but he’s not healthy.  In the future, I see us going woods and ogletree as TE1 and 2

I just think it's weird we keep drafting TEs who are athletic freaks just to give them a combined 2-6 targets in a game - what's the point of that?

[richard pallo]

The grades confirm we have a very good SS in Blackmon.  The FS spot is the weakest secondary position now when all of the starting corners are back.  If Cross was drafted to be our future FS it’s concerning that he hasn’t been able to get more snaps up to this point.  I know he’s young and that could be part of it.  But we traded up to draft him.  FS requires a lot of read and react so it’s going to be a difficult task for a rookie.  The wrong read and it could be over.  Having a good veteran FS back there would do wonders for the secondary.

[Dingus McGirt]

13 hours ago, w87r said:

PFF cumulative grades through week 9:

Team PFF scores:(positional rank)

 

Season grades are laid out as followed (week 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) **Last grade listed in current season rank**

 

 

Top 10

Improvement from prior week 

Decline from prior week

Bottom 10

 

 

 

Offense:

QB:

Minshew - 44.3(NR), 71.6(16/33), 58.4(29/33), 58.4(29/34), 62.9(27/33), 52.3(30/33), 48.3(34/35), 50.9(34/36), 51(33/36)

Ehlinger - *(inactive first 9 games)

Richardson - 49.3(27/32), 55.3(29/33), 55.3(30/33), 53.9(31/34), 52.2(31/33), 52.2(31/33) *IR

 

RB:

Moss - (NA), 63.6(30/51), 62.3(33/54), 62.1(35/51), 66.6(29/53), 66.6(31/55), 65.9(34/50), 68.1(31/53), 68.2(34/58)

Taylor - *PUP(first 4 games), 46.7(NR), 64(NR), 66.8(NR), 65.1(37/53), 69.3(32/58)

Sermon - (NA), (NA), 49(NR), 43.6(NR), 43.9(NR), 39.3(NR), 39.3(NR), 39.3(NR), 39.1(NR)

Funk - 63.5(NR), *(inactive weeks 2-9)

Hull - 65.7(NR) * IR

 

WR:

Pittman - 69.4(30/110), 63.1(65/113), 67.7(48/111), 67(52/113), 67.2(50/110), 67.7(50/113), 69.4(46/114), 68.6(53/120), 69.4(48/118)

Pierce - 49.7(100/110), 51.3(102/113), 54.5(96/111), 56(90/113), 56(91/110), 55.4(95/113), 58(83/114), 57.4(94/120), 55.7(101/118)

Downs - 55.8(78/110), 64.7(57/113), 65.5(57/111), 65.3(60/113), 71.5(36/110), 68.7(48/113), 72.8(36/114), 74.3(34/120), 73.9(37/118)

McKenzie - 59.1(NR), 67.6(NR), 63.6(NR), 52.3(NR), 49.8(NR), 65.7(NR), 63.7(NR), 62.5(NR), 62.5(NR)

Winfree - 54.1(NR), *(inactive week 2-7), 52.9(NR), 52.6(NR)

 

TE:

Cox - 53.3(40/63), 58(34/65), 54.6(43/69), 66.1(19/71), 68.2(16/68), 66.8(18/68), 65.6(21/69), 66.5(22/70), 64.6(25/68)

Ogletree - 68.2(NR), 68.2(NR), 68.4(NR), 81.4(2/71), 85.1(1/71), 74.7(5/68), 74.8(5/69), 73.4(7/70), 74.4(5/68)

Granson - 61.6(27/63), 56.6(39/65), 51.1(51/69), 54.8(41/71), 56.5(39/68), 57.2(41/68), 57.2(40/69), 57.2(41/70), 55.5(45/68)

Mallory - (NA), 88.3(NR), 88.3(NR), 88.3(NR), 88.3(NR), 72.2(NR), 65.6(NR), 62.5(NR), 62.5(NR)

Woods - * IR(first 9 games)

 

OT:

Raimann - 71.5(13/65), 76.9(11/71), 78.3(10/67), 78.3(11/71), 78.3(9/72), 79.3(10/74), 75.7(14/74), 78.6(10/75), 80.3(9/76)

Smith - 70.4(16/65), 74.9(15/71), 62.9(35/67), 70.6(23/71), 75.9(16/76), *(inactive week 6-9)

Freeland - (NA), (NA), (NA), 44.6(NR), 48.4(64/72), 59.5(50/74), 53.8(58/74), 52.7(62/75), 53.2(64/76)

 

OG:

Nelson - 70.9(14/65), 65(22/71), 60.4(35/76), 65.9(17/76), 68.1(17/78), 67.5(16/79), 67.5(17/80), 67.4(22/80), 62.4(35/81)

Fries - 55.4(42/65), 74.4(6/71), 65.5(22/76), 62.4(27/76), 65.4(22/78), 63.8(27/79), 65.9(22/80), 65.6(26/80), 61.8(37/81)

Sills - 58.6(NR), 58.6(NR), 49.4(NR), *(inactive week 4-9)

Hambright - *(inactive first 8 games), 60(NR)

 

OC:

Kelly - 70.6(8/32), 82.8(1/33), 82.8(1/35), 82.8(1/36), 86(1/37), 86.4(1/39), 83.5(1/38), 83.5(1/38), 81.3(3/38)

French - (NA), 46.6(NR), 43.3(35/35), 41.1(37/38), *(inactive week 5-9)

 

 

Defense:

DE:

Paye - 74.1(27/106), 75.8(29/107), 69.8(43/112), 65.9(53/111), 65.9(51/114), 62.5(66/111), 63.2(63/109), 66.8(52/113), 67.4(51/107)

Ekubam - 54.6(82/106), 63.9(59/107), 74.1(36/112), 77.3(21/111), 78.4(22/114), 78.4(24/111), 78.5(23/109), 78.9(22/113), 79(21/107)

Dayo - 58.3(72/106), 48(97/107), 51.3(96/112), 66.5(50/111), 59.6(79/114), 55.2(89/111), 55.2(90/109), 48.4(103/113), 49.2(99/107)

Lewis - 55.6(79/106), 55(88/107), 58.7(81/112), 56.6(85/111), 63(62/114), 67.6(46/111), 72.8(32/109), 70.1(44/113), 70.6(42/107)

Martin - 65.8(NR), 80.4(NR), 71.4(NR), 68.8(NR), 74.3(NR), 68.6(NR), 67.5(NR), 61.7(NR), 60(NR)

Land - *(inactive week 1-4), 59(NR), *(inactive week 6-9)

 

DT:

Buckner - 92.5(1/127), 88.2(6/124), 74.9(27/128), 70.9(33/129), 74.1(22/124), 71.2(25/123), 67.4(37/122), 72.6(20/125), 75(17/126)

Stewart - 90.2(3/127), 87.8(8/124), 85.5(9/128), 79.6(11/129), 73.9(23/124), 75.2(13/126) *(susp week 7-13)

Bryan - 63.1(63/127),  65.3(46/124), 68.3(40/128), 51.6(95/129), 51.3(89/124), 56(78/123), 54.1(84/122), 58.1(69/115), 54.8(84/126)

Johnson - 61.0(74/127), 62.7(54/124), 49.6(101/128), 42(115/129), 38.4(118/124), 45(111/123), 50.8(93/122), 50.8(93/125), 49.9(100/127)

Adebawore - (NA), (NA), (NA), 47.8(NR), 47.8(NR), 47.8(NR), 42.3(NR), 36(NR), 42.8(NR)

McTelvin - *(inactive week 1-7), 50.1(NR), 50.1(NR)

 

LB:

Leonard - 66.3(37/73), 72.4(27/79), 58.6(61/77), 53(67/78), 53(65/81), 58(60/83), 61.3(55/82), 63.9(53/80), 66.4(46/80)

Franklin - 92.2(2/73), 79.9(13/79), 68.7(31/77), 68.7(27/78), 62.9(50/81), 62.2(54/83), 59.6(60/82), 59.6(60/80), 59.6(63/80)

Speed - 94.8(1/73), 82.3(8/79), 61.4(52/77), 57.6(57/78), 52.5(69/81), 58.1(64/83), 59.4(61/82), 58.7(65/80), 62.4(55/80)

Olubi - (NA), (NA), (NA), 82(NR), 82(NR), 82(NR), 82(NR), 82.8(NR), 53.4(NR)

Stuart - (NA), 60(NR), 56.7(NR), 56.7(NR), 30.1(NR), *(inactive week 6-9)

 

CB:

Brents - (NA), (NA), 87.6(NR), 71.1(29/109), 67.7(42/109), 66.4(48/112), 67(37/115), 67(38/116), 67(38/113)

Moore - 57.3(62/92), 64.3(39/98), 69.2(33/105), 70.6(30/109), 69.4(30/109), 66.6(44/112), 68.8(30/115), 70.8(27/116), 80.7(10/113)

Jones - 60.0(NR), 60(NR), 60(NR), 63.5(NR), 66.5(NR), 63.1(NR), 59.2(73/115), 55.7(85/116), 66.1(47/113)

Baker - 44.8(87/92), 32.6(97/98), 32.6(104/105), 32.6(108/109), 32.6(108/109), 32.1(112/112), 30.1(115/115), 30.1(116/116), 43.2(109/113)

Brown - 78.3(NR), *(inactive week 2-7), 27.6(NR), 27.6(NR)

Flowers - 53.6(69/92), 59.6(60/98),  65.5(42/105), 66.4(45/109) * IR

 

S:

Blackmon - 53.6(64/79), 61.6(54/79) 61.7(54/85), 62.2(51/87), 72.1(23/86), 68.1(36/86), 77(11/84), 72.4(22/87), 74.3(18/87)

Thomas - 43.8(72/79), 50.8(72/79), 44.5(81/85), 48.9(79/87), 47.7(77/86), 49.8(79/86), 57.2(68/84), 55.1(74/87), 54.8(76/87)

Cross - (NA), 60.5(NR), 61.1(NR), 61.4(NR), 61.4(NR), 61.4(NR), 60.7(NR), 66.1(NR), 66.2(NR)

Denbow - *(inactive week 1-7), 46.3(NR), 46.3(NR)

 

K:

Gay - 63.5(NR), 68.2(NR), 90.4(NR), 83.3(NR), 83.9(NR), 88.3(NR), 87.9(NR), 88.3(NR), 90.5(NR)

 

P:

Sanchez  - 60.9(19/29), 64.9(14/29), 66(18/32), 62.2(22/32), 61.9(22/33), 62.6(23/34), 60.3(16/36), 60.5(25/33), 64.5(25/34)

Was Ehlinger actually “inactive?”

[w87r]

1 hour ago, Dingus McGirt said:

Was Ehlinger actually “inactive?”

No, just means he hasn't played any snaps. So essentially was inactive.

 

Just a way for me not to have to post the same grade over multiple week stretches if a player doesn't play for whatever reason 

[Dingus McGirt]

50 minutes ago, w87r said:

No, just means he hasn't played any snaps. So essentially was inactive.

 

Just a way for me not to have to post the same grade over multiple week stretches if a player doesn't play for whatever reason 

Got it.  Thought that might be it.  Sorry for questioning.  ,:^)

[w87r]

1 hour ago, Dingus McGirt said:

Got it.  Thought that might be it.  Sorry for questioning.  ,:^)

Valid question.

 

Inactive and not playing are 2 different things, well kinda, I guess? Lol. I just used it to mean both here 

 

But a good example would be Hambright, there has definitely been some games where he wasn't on the game day roster,(which means he was inactive), however, there's been some games where he was on the game day roster, but didn't play. So, technically he was still inactive because he didn't play, even though he was actually active (by NFL definition, game day roster). 

 

 

IDK, that was a wild ride right there.

 

Anyway, tried to find a way to get rid of some repetitive unnecessary numbers. Instead of having (9) weeks of (NR) listed. As there is enough numbers to look at already. A nice break helps a little bit. 

[w87r]

5 hours ago, Solid84 said:

Bruh, you're crazy! 

 

I would've have noped out of that in an instant, props to you. 

It definitely sucks. Lol.

 

 

I like to visualize the change throughout the season, so don't mind doing it, but......