Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

AFUn Game


JimJaime

Recommended Posts

Ok I figured with all the talk of "fire Pagano" etc on the main page be fun play this.  The game is you pick a team and say what they would have needed to been a Dynasty sunce the salary cap era. I will start:

 

the easy one one is the Colts. If they had drafted Manning then put I will say BB in charge of the team. I will dare say they win 4 SB in 5 years and dominate the AFC. I say this because BB as GM would not disregard Oline and the Defense like the colts did for so many years with Manning.  He would have used his Draft picks bolster the D and allow Manning to elevate the WR/TE around him while also having a decent running Game.  I am convinced the only reason Manning only won one SB is he had average/sub par HC and GM who neglected the other side of the ball setting them up for failure. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, JimJaime said:

Ok I figured with all the talk of "fire Pagano" etc on the main page be fun play this.  The game is you pick a team and say what they would have needed to been a Dynasty sunce the salary cap era. I will start:

 

the easy one one is the Colts. If they had drafted Manning then put I will say BB in charge of the team. I will dare say they win 4 SB in 5 years and dominate the AFC. I say this because BB as GM would not disregard Oline and the Defense like the colts did for so many years with Manning.  He would have used his Draft picks bolster the D and allow Manning to elevate the WR/TE around him while also having a decent running Game.  I am convinced the only reason Manning only won one SB is he had average/sub par HC and GM who neglected the other side of the ball setting them up for failure. 

 

 

You call Tony Dungy sub-par?  A GM who neglected the other side...Freeney, Mathis, Bob Sanders, etc... 

 

Could BB have done better who knows but your ending statement killed everything you said previously.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, JimJaime said:

Ok I figured with all the talk of "fire Pagano" etc on the main page be fun play this.  The game is you pick a team and say what they would have needed to been a Dynasty sunce the salary cap era. I will start:

 

the easy one one is the Colts. If they had drafted Manning then put I will say BB in charge of the team. I will dare say they win 4 SB in 5 years and dominate the AFC. I say this because BB as GM would not disregard Oline and the Defense like the colts did for so many years with Manning.  He would have used his Draft picks bolster the D and allow Manning to elevate the WR/TE around him while also having a decent running Game.  I am convinced the only reason Manning only won one SB is he had average/sub par HC and GM who neglected the other side of the ball setting them up for failure. 

 

 

 

The game seems pretty simple, name any NFL team and then insert the bolded statement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, DaColts85 said:

You call Tony Dungy sub-par?  A GM who neglected the other side...Freeney, Mathis, Bob Sanders, etc... 

 

Could BB have done better who knows but your ending statement killed everything you said previously.  

 

Tony Dungy was average.  

 

Bill may have drafted a couple of players for the defense but his defense were always top heavy with very underwhelming depth behind the starters.  Which is why they'd get outclassed every game because the starters can't play every single snap. Also doesn't help that of the players you mention, one was a one dimensional rotation player (well Freeney should have been as he was useless unless it was third down), and another made of glass.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Surge89 said:

 

Tony Dungy was average.  

 

Bill may have drafted a couple of players for the defense but his defense were always top heavy with very underwhelming depth behind the starters.  Which is why they'd get outclassed every game because the starters can't play every single snap. Also doesn't help that of the players you mention, one was a one dimensional rotation player (well Freeney should have been as he was useless unless it was third down), and another made of glass.  

Disagree.  I would ramble on but this is a pointless argument with two points of view.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/12/2017 at 4:32 PM, DaColts85 said:

You call Tony Dungy sub-par?  A GM who neglected the other side...Freeney, Mathis, Bob Sanders, etc... 

 

Could BB have done better who knows but your ending statement killed everything you said previously.  

Nope I consider dingy average.. not a great HC not a bad HC just average... I also blame the God Polian because he spent capital on WR and toys for Manning and left the D be crap... but I did not mean Dungy was sub par I was meaning Caldwell sub par

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm good with picking up the option. I kind of agree a little with Ballard that there is more upside to Paye on passing downs. He is a good athlete and he has improved each season. Important that he says healthy, he was quite a raw prospect coming out of college and was then injured alot in his first 2 seasons in the NFL. So I can see why Ballard would like him around for another 2 years to see how much they can improve him. He's also an excellent run defender, which is important to note, especially in that LDE role.
    • Doug….   I’ve just read your latest two posts.   And as has been the recent trend, I don’t understand your logic.   So I’ve got a long post to respond to your long post.    So let me ask you an important question:     Have you noticed in the last month or so that I am responding to your posts very slowly?   I’m taking 8, 10, even 12 hours to respond.    I’m doing it deliberately.  I don’t want us to be going back and forth and back and forth while we’re both awake.  I’m trying to slow the pace of communication so things don’t get heated.  So I’m not trying to pick a fight,  I’m trying to AVOID a fight.   As to your two posts….   I think your memory is playing tricks with you.  Ballard said “let’s take the wide receiver” this draft for Mitchell.  His quote in 2022 after the Colts had no pick in the first round was this…. “Tomorrow,  wide receiver, tight end, tackle, and safety or corner.”   What did Ballard do?   He took those 4 positions in that order.  But not until he had traded DOWN from 35 to 53 for Pierce.   That was Reich’s personal pick.  Ballard was confident the players would be there and they were.   Not possible if everyone has same info as you assert.    Do you remember the 2019 draft when Ballard took Rock, Benagu, Campbell, and Okereke on Day 2,  that was the first year of the popular video series and the most memorable sound was Frank going around the war room high fiving everyone yelling “Four for Four!  Four for Four!”   Those were the guys Frank wanted, those were the guys Ballard got him.   Not possible if every team sees things the same.    The story of the 21 draft was the Colts picking 21.  And Ballard telling the scouts he had a good feeling that Paye, who the Colts ranked 10th on their board, would fall to the Colts.   And he did.   Ballard thought Dayo would fall to pick 54, and he said he likely would’ve taken Dayo at 21 if Paye had been taken.  Ballard was right again.   And again, not possible if everyone sees things the same.    Historically speaking…. In 2012, Seattle had Russell Wilson ranked THIRD on their board.  But they waited to draft him at pick 75 because they thought at 5’10” and 5/8ths,  RW would still be there.  And he was.   That wouldn’t be possible if everyone had mostly similar rankings as you believe.  As for Reimann:  picked 77.  You talk about his value as a left tackle.  Yet he lasted to pick 77.   Any other team could’ve taken him before the Colts did.   They didn’t.  Yet you think it has nothing to do with his age.  I don’t understand the logic you use to reject the age argument.   I don’t see an alternative view that makes sense.    All of these are examples of teams seeing the same thing differently.  They value things differently.  When asked recently, Steichen said he valued quickness in a wide receiver.  For other teams they might value speed, or precision route running.   Every team has its own identity based on what they value.    GMs are different.  Head coaches are different.  Scouts are different.   They are NOT working with the same information.  Every team has their own Big Board and the differences are big, not small.  32 teams, 32 very very different looking boards.     I’m 67.  I have literally studied the draft for more than 50 years.   The draft has always been a passion of mine, even before I became a TV sports producer at age 23.   I’m not making this up.     This post could be longer, but I think it’s gone long enough.  There was much to talk about.   Thanks for reading.               
    • Next year imagine the Colts will be looking at 2 QBs.  My top dual threat/mobile pocket passers are Jalen Milroe, Grayson McCall, and KJ Jefferson.   For offensive lineman got to love LT Kelvin Banks Jr who managed to hold his own versus Will Anderson a few years ago and LG Donovan Jackson.  Jackson has generated all-conference honors the past two seasons; Nelson's contract expires at the end of 2026 where he will be 30 years old.   So far for running backs I like Treveyon Henderson, DJ Giddens, and Kyle Monangai.  Each back knows how to secure the rock.  Last I checked both Dalvin Cook and Damien Harris are still free agents that would improve our roster.   Not sure if we need a top talented wide receiver early but am interested in Tre Harris and Ricky White.  While De'Corian Clark been compared to Alec Pierce and made Bruce Feldman's Freak list.  Still need to see where his high school numbers would have ranked compared to this year's draft class.     Plenty of defensive lineman to like in the next draft and probably one of the best groups coming out.   Edge Princely Umanmielen - one I feel is a fit for the Colts Edge Jack Sawyer is another stud that I want to pair with Latu and Paye Edge James Pearce Jr. DT 3-tech Tyleik Williams Edge/DL Mykel Willaims - as a freshman led all FBS true freshman edge defenders LDT Kenneth Grant NT/DT Walter Nolan Edge Dani Dennis-Sutton Edge Landon Jackson Edge Patrick Payton Edge Tyler Baron DL Shermar Turner - been one of the more disruptive DTs in the SEC.  Has a quick first step and body control to shoot the gaps. NT/DT Tonka Hemingway Edge Jasheen Davis NT/DT Alfred Collins. Linebackers got an interesting group of prospects to keep an eye on from the following: WLB Jack Kiser WLB Danny Stutsman LB Dasan McCullough MLB/OLB Jay Higgins LB/Edge Collin Oliver LB Eugene Asante SLB/Edge Khordae Sydnor LB Keaten Wade LB/Edge Steve Linton WLB Eric Gentry Read where some say this is a very weak safety class but got a few that seem to have potential.  This draft class I noticed more excel in press/man more than zone but still very capable of playing both.  Some of the defensive backs I like so far are: LCB Will Johnson CB Benjamin Morrison CB Ricardo Hallman SS Kevin Winston Jr - Blackmon signed a 1-year deal but only a 2% missed tackle rate and ranked 2nd among all safeties in 2023. SS Xavier Nwankpa - 4.39s-forty speed reminds me of Nick Cross FS Rod Moore - excellent 4.40s-forty speed FS Hunter Wohler - slower 4.52s-forty speed, if can improve his speed might be better than Rod Moore CB Tacario Davis CB Maxwell Hairston FS Jahdae Barron CB Jacobee Bryant CB Jordan Hancock CB Denver Harris SS Keon Sabb CB Malik Spencer CB Aydan White CB Tommi Hill - In 2023 had an outstanding QB rating when targeted of 38.6.  With another solid year Hill could move up the draft boards. Still on the lookout of those players not listed on the primary draft boards that the Colts always seem to find hidden gems to draft.
    • This is the list of Retired Colts Numbers. Peyton Manning — No. 18 Johnny Unitas — No. 19 Buddy Young — No. 22 Lenny Moore — No. 24 Art Donovan — No. 70 Jim Parker — No. 77 Raymond Berry — No. 82 Gino Marchetti — No. 89
    • a lot of the recent super bowl winners had game changing tight ends bowers would have been a nice addition but i like who we got, imo an a plus draft  
  • Members

    • TheNewGuy

      TheNewGuy 16

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • sellmyhousefast

      sellmyhousefast 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Virtuoso80

      Virtuoso80 435

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Behle

      Behle 102

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nadine

      Nadine 8,136

      Administrators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TheBlueAndWhite

      TheBlueAndWhite 154

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Yoshinator

      Yoshinator 9,389

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • SOMDColtsfan

      SOMDColtsfan 418

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CardiacColts

      CardiacColts 342

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dunk

      Dunk 1,387

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...