Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Yahoo Ranks Colts #16 - Not a bad article though


cjrulli
 Share

Recommended Posts

First off the article IMO was fairly well written. Made some great observations and points. However, I think the editor definitely is underrating the new defense we have. Last year our defense came up big when it needed too and we actually played very well run D outside of a few games. Bit of a fantasy focus. 

 

Some of my favorite quotes

 

"So let's not pretend Luck was dealt exactly the same hand as Russell Wilson or RG3, or whoever else. He was placed in a unique situation and performed unreasonably well. Andrew Luck, in a nutshell, is a damn good quarterback coming off a phenomenal year."

 

"Luck is the eleventh quarterback off the board in an average Yahoo! draft (ADP 79.8), yet his ceiling is clearly much higher."

 

"Coby Fleener and Dwayne Allen form one of the NFL's better tight end tandems"

 

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/fantasy-roto-arcade/juggernaut-index-no-16-indianapolis-colts-001300503.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It should be noted that the author believes we are 16th in terms of fantasy football, not the NFL.  A few of my thoughts:

 

1. "We should also note that Luck was sacked 41 times, the fourth-highest total in the league, and he was hit while throwing another 14 times, which tied for the NFL lead. Indianapolis receivers dropped 50 of his pass attempts, the most in football (again, per PFF). The Colts running game wasn't particularly effective (3.8 YPC), and the team's defense ranked 26th overall, allowing 374.3 yards per game."

I didn't realize it was that bad.  Jeez. 

2. Luck had 14 straight completions at one point in camp.  That's unreal!

3. I think Luck should be drafted higher than rounds 7-9, especially in keeper leagues

4. The author certainly has a sense of humour.  "Vick Ballard proved reliable if not spectacular as a rookie, averaging 3.9 YPC and gaining 966 scrimmage yards. He'll see plenty of first-team reps in camp with Bradshaw sidelined. Think of him as a high-end handcuff. And try not to think of Donald Brown ever again."

5. Who will be the better fantasy TE between Fleener and Allen?  The writer leans towards Fleener because he was really productive in Stanford's offense.  But Allen is so versatile, he can do it all.  However, not everything he can do (such as blocking) will show up on the fantasy football stats.  So who would you take first?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It should be noted that the author believes we are 16th in terms of fantasy football, not the NFL.  A few of my thoughts:

 

1. "We should also note that Luck was sacked 41 times, the fourth-highest total in the league, and he was hit while throwing another 14 times, which tied for the NFL lead. Indianapolis receivers dropped 50 of his pass attempts, the most in football (again, per PFF). The Colts running game wasn't particularly effective (3.8 YPC), and the team's defense ranked 26th overall, allowing 374.3 yards per game."

I didn't realize it was that bad.  Jeez. 

2. Luck had 14 straight completions at one point in camp.  That's unreal!

3. I think Luck should be drafted higher than rounds 7-9, especially in keeper leagues

4. The author certainly has a sense of humour.  "Vick Ballard proved reliable if not spectacular as a rookie, averaging 3.9 YPC and gaining 966 scrimmage yards. He'll see plenty of first-team reps in camp with Bradshaw sidelined. Think of him as a high-end handcuff. And try not to think of Donald Brown ever again."

5. Who will be the better fantasy TE between Fleener and Allen?  The writer leans towards Fleener because he was really productive in Stanford's offense.  But Allen is so versatile, he can do it all.  However, not everything he can do (such as blocking) will show up on the fantasy football stats.  So who would you take first?

 

Sorry, my misunderstanding. I wasn't exactly sure what Juggernaut rankings were, assumed it was Yahoo's power rankings haha

 

But to answer your last question, I think I agree with the author. I'd take Fleener first. He's a big target in endzone, all the camp hype, and the fact that he will be very familiar with this offense, and the OC. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The defense hasn't really proven anything and they haven't made too many big upgrades at each position (Landry over Zbi is probably the only major one, and maybe the two new guys at OLB). They should be quite a bit better because it's another year in Pagano's offense; they're more comfortable. 

 

So, I don't think the Colts defense is underrated. They could surprise, but underrated is something else. They should end up in the top 20 if everything goes according to plan. 

 

Definitely agree on Allen and Fleener, Allen was awesome last year and Fleener is having a good camp. They could creep into the top 4 TE tandems at the end of the year. Two very talented players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The defense hasn't really proven anything and they haven't made too many big upgrades at each position (Landry over Zbi is probably the only major one, and maybe the two new guys at OLB). They should be quite a bit better because it's another year in Pagano's offense; they're more comfortable. 

 

So, I don't think the Colts defense is underrated. They could surprise, but underrated is something else. They should end up in the top 20 if everything goes according to plan. 

 

Definitely agree on Allen and Fleener, Allen was awesome last year and Fleener is having a good camp. They could creep into the top 4 TE tandems at the end of the year. Two very talented players.

When you're ranked in the bottom 8 in just about every defensive category through 2012 and add quite a few of the pieces we did I'd say we're pretty underrated. Think about it, we may not have any major upgrades but we filled holes with players to better fit the system, making the system more effective. Landry allows Bethea to play where he was easily considered a probowler, toler is an upgrade over Vaughn/butler, we actually have true NTs on this team, and our lbs have another year of experience as you said. Maybe underrated was a bad word to use, but I sure as hell don't think we will bottom 8 in defense. I'm not saying we will be top 10 either, but I think defense will be considered a strength of our quite a few times throughout this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Reich is one of the greatest assets the Colts have; he is awesome. Hope he is the coach and calling plays for years to come. 
    • He's an interesting case. Last week against Buffalo he made several critical blocks to spring nice runs, and this week makes several nice catches. Particularly liked the toe drag swag for the first down. Really good all around contributor.
    • you're way oversimplifying to try to justify your point.  It's not so much about one player as it is about completely ignoring one important aspect of the game....the running game.  if they took Taylor out and gave the carries to Jackson, Hines or Mack, that would have still been infinitely better than not attempting a run for over an entire quarter.   It was proven in the other threads that when the colts at least attempt to run the ball (even in a pass heavy offense with a 2:1 pass to run ratio):   -the colts commit far fewer turnovers -the colts punt far less frequently -the colts score more efficiently   something that won't show up on any stat sheet:  when run blocking, the offensive line gets to attack the opposing defensive line.  when pass blocking, the opposing defensive line gets to attack our offensive line.  it only stands to reason that the opposing defensive line will wear down far more quickly when they're being attacked than when they're doing the attacking.  this only helps the passing game by wearing down the opposing pass rushers.   even the great peyton manning wasn't able to beat teams all on his own.  the one time they had the most success from an offensive perspective in the playoffs was when he continued to utilize the running game with addai and rhodes.  how many years did the offense stink up the place in playoff games because peyton put everything on his shoulders and failed to utilize the running game, even when it was very successful in the regular season?     Frank was given one of the best offensive lines in football which is one of the best in run blocking in the league, and maybe above average in pass blocking.  he wasn't scared to play to his strengths against buffalo so I can't even fathom why he refused to do the same against the bucs.  in his post game presser he tried to justify by saying the run wasn't working in the first quarter.  that's true.  what he failed to mention was that the run game was successful in the 2nd quarter and that's when the offense as a whole was the most effective and scored the most points.     it's no coincidence that the colt's record is far better when they attempt at least 18-20+ rushes vs the very poor record in games when they rush for 15 or fewer.  spread the rushing attempts around to mack, hines, jackson and taylor if you want.  that's fine.  it's still keeping the defense honest.  though, it only makes sense to give as many as possible to the guy averaging over 5 ypc, even against the best rush defenses in the league.  one of the few non-qbs to get himself into the mvp conversation.  
    • Nothing wrong at all with being critical of Frank, Wentz, Fish, or whoever. If they play bad or Frank has some head scratching calls I get it. I am critical of players and coaches but to say we should get rid of someone everytime we lose is comical when people do that, JMO.
    • He would of scored a TD had Fisher held on for one more second against barrett.
  • Members

    • The Peytonator

      The Peytonator 466

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • B~Town

      B~Town 266

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Malakai432

      Malakai432 1,045

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • MFT5

      MFT5 234

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IndyEric07

      IndyEric07 329

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Tsarquise

      Tsarquise 496

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Jared Cisneros

      Jared Cisneros 4,405

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • buccolts

      buccolts 2,872

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • life long

      life long 353

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • SR711

      SR711 315

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...