Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Conversations are moderated for civility. We ask that you please stay on topic. For more info, see our Community Guidelines ×
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

PFF Scores week 9

Solid84

By Solid84
in Colts Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

AKB Ring of Honor

AKB

Posted
Posted

so the grades confirm Jaylon Jones absolutely balled out. 

 

playing great, fantastic. If it weren't for Brents and Downs playing so well, he'd hands down be my favorite rookie.

 

I also think we have a sleeper TE in Mallory, waiting for his chance. 

 

I think Mallory would instantly get more production than pierce, overall, even split wide. 

 

maybe that last part deserves to go in the unpopular opinion thread, who knows

Link to comment
Share on other sites
smittywerb Ring of Honor

smittywerb

Posted
Posted

I agree about the tight ends.  I think it’s because we really don’t have a do it all tight end.  Ogletree seems to find open spots well but he’s not a burner, or in other words someone who can beat a LB.  
 

The other tight ends do one thing and another thing not so good.  Whether that’s can get open but can’t block or vice versa.  
 

Woods seems to be another do it all tight end but he’s not healthy.  In the future, I see us going woods and ogletree as TE1 and 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Solid84 Ring of Honor

Solid84

Posted
  • Author
Posted
20 minutes ago, smittywerb said:

I agree about the tight ends.  I think it’s because we really don’t have a do it all tight end.  Ogletree seems to find open spots well but he’s not a burner, or in other words someone who can beat a LB.  
 

The other tight ends do one thing and another thing not so good.  Whether that’s can get open but can’t block or vice versa.  
 

Woods seems to be another do it all tight end but he’s not healthy.  In the future, I see us going woods and ogletree as TE1 and 2

I just think it's weird we keep drafting TEs who are athletic freaks just to give them a combined 2-6 targets in a game - what's the point of that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
richard pallo Ring of Honor

richard pallo

Posted
Posted

The grades confirm we have a very good SS in Blackmon.  The FS spot is the weakest secondary position now when all of the starting corners are back.  If Cross was drafted to be our future FS it’s concerning that he hasn’t been able to get more snaps up to this point.  I know he’s young and that could be part of it.  But we traded up to draft him.  FS requires a lot of read and react so it’s going to be a difficult task for a rookie.  The wrong read and it could be over.  Having a good veteran FS back there would do wonders for the secondary.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dingus McGirt Ring of Honor

Dingus McGirt

Posted
Posted
13 hours ago, w87r said:

PFF cumulative grades through week 9:

Team PFF scores:(positional rank)

 

Season grades are laid out as followed (week 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) **Last grade listed in current season rank**

 

 

Top 10

Improvement from prior week 

Decline from prior week

Bottom 10

 

 

 

Offense:

QB:

Minshew - 44.3(NR), 71.6(16/33), 58.4(29/33), 58.4(29/34), 62.9(27/33), 52.3(30/33), 48.3(34/35), 50.9(34/36), 51(33/36)

Ehlinger - *(inactive first 9 games)

Richardson - 49.3(27/32), 55.3(29/33), 55.3(30/33), 53.9(31/34), 52.2(31/33), 52.2(31/33) *IR

 

RB:

Moss - (NA), 63.6(30/51), 62.3(33/54), 62.1(35/51), 66.6(29/53), 66.6(31/55), 65.9(34/50), 68.1(31/53), 68.2(34/58)

Taylor - *PUP(first 4 games), 46.7(NR), 64(NR), 66.8(NR), 65.1(37/53), 69.3(32/58)

Sermon - (NA), (NA), 49(NR), 43.6(NR), 43.9(NR), 39.3(NR), 39.3(NR), 39.3(NR), 39.1(NR)

Funk - 63.5(NR), *(inactive weeks 2-9)

Hull - 65.7(NR) * IR

 

WR:

Pittman - 69.4(30/110), 63.1(65/113), 67.7(48/111), 67(52/113), 67.2(50/110), 67.7(50/113), 69.4(46/114), 68.6(53/120), 69.4(48/118)

Pierce - 49.7(100/110), 51.3(102/113), 54.5(96/111), 56(90/113), 56(91/110), 55.4(95/113), 58(83/114), 57.4(94/120), 55.7(101/118)

Downs - 55.8(78/110), 64.7(57/113), 65.5(57/111), 65.3(60/113), 71.5(36/110), 68.7(48/113), 72.8(36/114), 74.3(34/120), 73.9(37/118)

McKenzie - 59.1(NR), 67.6(NR), 63.6(NR), 52.3(NR), 49.8(NR), 65.7(NR), 63.7(NR), 62.5(NR), 62.5(NR)

Winfree - 54.1(NR), *(inactive week 2-7), 52.9(NR), 52.6(NR)

 

TE:

Cox - 53.3(40/63), 58(34/65), 54.6(43/69), 66.1(19/71), 68.2(16/68), 66.8(18/68), 65.6(21/69), 66.5(22/70), 64.6(25/68)

Ogletree - 68.2(NR), 68.2(NR), 68.4(NR), 81.4(2/71), 85.1(1/71), 74.7(5/68), 74.8(5/69), 73.4(7/70), 74.4(5/68)

Granson - 61.6(27/63), 56.6(39/65), 51.1(51/69), 54.8(41/71), 56.5(39/68), 57.2(41/68), 57.2(40/69), 57.2(41/70), 55.5(45/68)

Mallory - (NA), 88.3(NR), 88.3(NR), 88.3(NR), 88.3(NR), 72.2(NR), 65.6(NR), 62.5(NR), 62.5(NR)

Woods - * IR(first 9 games)

 

OT:

Raimann - 71.5(13/65), 76.9(11/71), 78.3(10/67), 78.3(11/71), 78.3(9/72), 79.3(10/74), 75.7(14/74), 78.6(10/75), 80.3(9/76)

Smith - 70.4(16/65), 74.9(15/71), 62.9(35/67), 70.6(23/71), 75.9(16/76), *(inactive week 6-9)

Freeland - (NA), (NA), (NA), 44.6(NR), 48.4(64/72), 59.5(50/74), 53.8(58/74), 52.7(62/75), 53.2(64/76)

 

OG:

Nelson - 70.9(14/65), 65(22/71), 60.4(35/76), 65.9(17/76), 68.1(17/78), 67.5(16/79), 67.5(17/80), 67.4(22/80), 62.4(35/81)

Fries - 55.4(42/65), 74.4(6/71), 65.5(22/76), 62.4(27/76), 65.4(22/78), 63.8(27/79), 65.9(22/80), 65.6(26/80), 61.8(37/81)

Sills - 58.6(NR), 58.6(NR), 49.4(NR), *(inactive week 4-9)

Hambright - *(inactive first 8 games), 60(NR)

 

OC:

Kelly - 70.6(8/32), 82.8(1/33), 82.8(1/35), 82.8(1/36), 86(1/37), 86.4(1/39), 83.5(1/38), 83.5(1/38), 81.3(3/38)

French - (NA), 46.6(NR), 43.3(35/35), 41.1(37/38), *(inactive week 5-9)

 

 

Defense:

DE:

Paye - 74.1(27/106), 75.8(29/107), 69.8(43/112), 65.9(53/111), 65.9(51/114), 62.5(66/111), 63.2(63/109), 66.8(52/113), 67.4(51/107)

Ekubam - 54.6(82/106), 63.9(59/107), 74.1(36/112), 77.3(21/111), 78.4(22/114), 78.4(24/111), 78.5(23/109), 78.9(22/113), 79(21/107)

Dayo - 58.3(72/106), 48(97/107), 51.3(96/112), 66.5(50/111), 59.6(79/114), 55.2(89/111), 55.2(90/109), 48.4(103/113), 49.2(99/107)

Lewis - 55.6(79/106), 55(88/107), 58.7(81/112), 56.6(85/111), 63(62/114), 67.6(46/111), 72.8(32/109), 70.1(44/113), 70.6(42/107)

Martin - 65.8(NR), 80.4(NR), 71.4(NR), 68.8(NR), 74.3(NR), 68.6(NR), 67.5(NR), 61.7(NR), 60(NR)

Land - *(inactive week 1-4), 59(NR), *(inactive week 6-9)

 

DT:

Buckner - 92.5(1/127), 88.2(6/124), 74.9(27/128), 70.9(33/129), 74.1(22/124), 71.2(25/123), 67.4(37/122), 72.6(20/125), 75(17/126)

Stewart - 90.2(3/127), 87.8(8/124), 85.5(9/128), 79.6(11/129), 73.9(23/124), 75.2(13/126) *(susp week 7-13)

Bryan - 63.1(63/127),  65.3(46/124), 68.3(40/128), 51.6(95/129), 51.3(89/124), 56(78/123), 54.1(84/122), 58.1(69/115), 54.8(84/126)

Johnson - 61.0(74/127), 62.7(54/124), 49.6(101/128), 42(115/129), 38.4(118/124), 45(111/123), 50.8(93/122), 50.8(93/125), 49.9(100/127)

Adebawore - (NA), (NA), (NA), 47.8(NR), 47.8(NR), 47.8(NR), 42.3(NR), 36(NR), 42.8(NR)

McTelvin - *(inactive week 1-7), 50.1(NR), 50.1(NR)

 

LB:

Leonard - 66.3(37/73), 72.4(27/79), 58.6(61/77), 53(67/78), 53(65/81), 58(60/83), 61.3(55/82), 63.9(53/80), 66.4(46/80)

Franklin - 92.2(2/73), 79.9(13/79), 68.7(31/77), 68.7(27/78), 62.9(50/81), 62.2(54/83), 59.6(60/82), 59.6(60/80), 59.6(63/80)

Speed - 94.8(1/73), 82.3(8/79), 61.4(52/77), 57.6(57/78), 52.5(69/81), 58.1(64/83), 59.4(61/82), 58.7(65/80), 62.4(55/80)

Olubi - (NA), (NA), (NA), 82(NR), 82(NR), 82(NR), 82(NR), 82.8(NR), 53.4(NR)

Stuart - (NA), 60(NR), 56.7(NR), 56.7(NR), 30.1(NR), *(inactive week 6-9)

 

CB:

Brents - (NA), (NA), 87.6(NR), 71.1(29/109), 67.7(42/109), 66.4(48/112), 67(37/115), 67(38/116), 67(38/113)

Moore - 57.3(62/92), 64.3(39/98), 69.2(33/105), 70.6(30/109), 69.4(30/109), 66.6(44/112), 68.8(30/115), 70.8(27/116), 80.7(10/113)

Jones - 60.0(NR), 60(NR), 60(NR), 63.5(NR), 66.5(NR), 63.1(NR), 59.2(73/115), 55.7(85/116), 66.1(47/113)

Baker - 44.8(87/92), 32.6(97/98), 32.6(104/105), 32.6(108/109), 32.6(108/109), 32.1(112/112), 30.1(115/115), 30.1(116/116), 43.2(109/113)

Brown - 78.3(NR), *(inactive week 2-7), 27.6(NR), 27.6(NR)

Flowers - 53.6(69/92), 59.6(60/98),  65.5(42/105), 66.4(45/109) * IR

 

S:

Blackmon - 53.6(64/79), 61.6(54/79) 61.7(54/85), 62.2(51/87), 72.1(23/86), 68.1(36/86), 77(11/84), 72.4(22/87), 74.3(18/87)

Thomas - 43.8(72/79), 50.8(72/79), 44.5(81/85), 48.9(79/87), 47.7(77/86), 49.8(79/86), 57.2(68/84), 55.1(74/87), 54.8(76/87)

Cross - (NA), 60.5(NR), 61.1(NR), 61.4(NR), 61.4(NR), 61.4(NR), 60.7(NR), 66.1(NR), 66.2(NR)

Denbow - *(inactive week 1-7), 46.3(NR), 46.3(NR)

 

K:

Gay - 63.5(NR), 68.2(NR), 90.4(NR), 83.3(NR), 83.9(NR), 88.3(NR), 87.9(NR), 88.3(NR), 90.5(NR)

 

P:

Sanchez  - 60.9(19/29), 64.9(14/29), 66(18/32), 62.2(22/32), 61.9(22/33), 62.6(23/34), 60.3(16/36), 60.5(25/33), 64.5(25/34)

Was Ehlinger actually “inactive?”

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
w87r Ring of Honor

w87r

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Dingus McGirt said:

Was Ehlinger actually “inactive?”

No, just means he hasn't played any snaps. So essentially was inactive.

 

Just a way for me not to have to post the same grade over multiple week stretches if a player doesn't play for whatever reason 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dingus McGirt Ring of Honor

Dingus McGirt

Posted
Posted
50 minutes ago, w87r said:

No, just means he hasn't played any snaps. So essentially was inactive.

 

Just a way for me not to have to post the same grade over multiple week stretches if a player doesn't play for whatever reason 

Got it.  Thought that might be it.  Sorry for questioning.  ,:^)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
w87r Ring of Honor

w87r

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Dingus McGirt said:

Got it.  Thought that might be it.  Sorry for questioning.  ,:^)

Valid question.

 

Inactive and not playing are 2 different things, well kinda, I guess? Lol. I just used it to mean both here 

 

But a good example would be Hambright, there has definitely been some games where he wasn't on the game day roster,(which means he was inactive), however, there's been some games where he was on the game day roster, but didn't play. So, technically he was still inactive because he didn't play, even though he was actually active (by NFL definition, game day roster). 

 

 

IDK, that was a wild ride right there.

 

Anyway, tried to find a way to get rid of some repetitive unnecessary numbers. Instead of having (9) weeks of (NR) listed. As there is enough numbers to look at already. A nice break helps a little bit. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
w87r Ring of Honor

w87r

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, Solid84 said:

Bruh, you're crazy! haha

 

I would've have noped out of that in an instant, props to you. :thmup:

page regards GIF

It definitely sucks. Lol.

 

 

I like to visualize the change throughout the season, so don't mind doing it, but......

Matthew Broderick GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Solid84
      Do you see any progress with Richardson?

      By Solid84 · Posted

      It just seems like people have sold themselves the idea he was going to come out great this season which I think is and was completely unreasonable.   I hope to see some improvement by the end of the season, but I really don't expect a whole lot until sometime next season. AR has got so much catching up to do.   I mean, there's no doubt AR's struggles are affecting MPJ, but MPJ has never been a great separater and seeing a defender right besides MPJ is probably stopping AR from throwing his way at this point.   Also, to be clear, I'm not saying AR will DEFINITELY be great, but I do think we DEFINITELY don't know yet and people need to be a lot more patient with him.
    • Restinpeacesweetchloe
      Do you see any progress with Richardson?

      By Restinpeacesweetchloe · Posted

      They both couldn’t throw or work on footwork. To ignore this could be a possibility with AR is naive. Let’s see where he is by game 7. Especially when it looks like he went backwards  from last season.
    • shasta519
      Do you see any progress with Richardson?

      By shasta519 · Posted

      Other than the fact that Luck was a proven NFL QB in his prime and that his shoulder rehab lasted 3x as long.   
    • shasta519
      Do you see any progress with Richardson?

      By shasta519 · Posted

      His lack of experience was a well-known risk in drafting him and it's a big reason why some were skeptical (including me). On the flip side, it sort of seemed like people disregarded his lack of experience then in favor of things like potential and upside. But now he's struggling and it's showing. If anything, it's validated those initial concerns.   I tend to think WR drops following a QB from college to the NFL says as much about the QB as it does the pass catchers. But they need to do better. I think it will take a combination of improvements from both AR and the pass catchers.   Not sure if something is up with MPJ, but some "regression" this year was very predictable. At one point, I actually thought he might leave in FA when faced with prospect of re-signing with a run-first team and a young QB who is still learning how to throw short and intermediate passes (the area he operates). But he stayed...and I am glad he did. But if it continues, there are going to be a lot of people blaming MPJ, which is pretty ridiculous, when you think about just 6 months ago, people were talking about how great of a contract it was and that MPJ was a legit WR1 with AR.  
    • cdgacoltsfan
      What team will have the most fans this Sunday ?

      By cdgacoltsfan · Posted

      Last week,Rams home game, Sofi looked like a 49ers home game. Dallas and Vegas are that way too.

  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...