AKB Posted September 21, 2021 Share Posted September 21, 2021 From my untrained eye, he looked great next to Nelson. Why is no one talking about this? Is it because he didn't finish the whole game? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewColtsFan Posted September 21, 2021 Share Posted September 21, 2021 I think he graded out at 62 for PFF. That’s a long way from great. Acceptable for game one with little to no training camp. But he’ll be better as the season goes on and he plays his way back into shape. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Restinpeacesweetchloe Posted September 21, 2021 Share Posted September 21, 2021 They did. The left side of the line was pretty dang good Sunday. They only allowed one pressure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastStreet Posted September 21, 2021 Share Posted September 21, 2021 Not bad, but not good. 62ish PFF and gave up a sack. It's elite if you're comparing to Davenport though....... Pryor graded the same and didn't give up a sack. Not suggesting he should play over Fisher. I'm saying he should play over Davenport. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colt.45 Posted September 21, 2021 Share Posted September 21, 2021 Before the game i expected that he'd be Tevi/Davenport bad, and work his way up to very good by week 5 or 6. Compared to the rest of the line, he was 2nd only to Q. For me, that was as good as I'd have realistically expected. The line may stink but I give it up to Chris Ballard for this one, best case scenario unfolded for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastStreet Posted September 21, 2021 Share Posted September 21, 2021 11 minutes ago, Colt.45 said: Before the game i expected that he'd be Tevi/Davenport bad, and work his way up to very good by week 5 or 6. Compared to the rest of the line, he was 2nd only to Q. For me, that was as good as I'd have realistically expected. The line may stink but I give it up to Chris Ballard for this one, best case scenario unfolded for him. I didn't expect Tevi/Dave bad, I just expected rust, which I think we saw. He did give up a sack. But so did Kelly. I was most afraid of Pryor to be honest, and he was pretty darn solid in his limited snaps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoachLite Posted September 21, 2021 Share Posted September 21, 2021 52 minutes ago, EastStreet said: Not bad, but not good. 62ish PFF and gave up a sack. It's elite if you're comparing to Davenport though....... Pryor graded the same and didn't give up a sack. Not suggesting he should play over Fisher. I'm saying he should play over Davenport. We can't play musical chairs with the OLine. They've got to learn to communicate and work together. Pryor may work well. I have my doubts about Davenport. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKB Posted September 22, 2021 Author Share Posted September 22, 2021 I did not do an in depth anaylsis, but I remember he looked solid. I mean first game back? I wonder what his grade would be if you erase the one sack. When he left the game it was noticeable, in a terrible way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.