Archer Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 These mock draft tool websites (fanspeak, first-pick) seem to have LB as a big need for the Colts. Call me crazy, but I don’t see it as a need at all. Walker and Leonard are studs, Okereke has been a very pleasant surprise, Speed looked great in pre-season, and Franklin and Adams can play. Plus, we typically only have two LBs in there, and nobody’s contract is up after the year. What say you? 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GRUMPY OLD MAN Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 10 minutes ago, Archer said: These mock draft tool websites (fanspeak, first-pick) seem to have LB as a big need for the Colts. Call me crazy, but I don’t see it as a need at all. Walker and Leonard are studs, Okereke has been a very pleasant surprise, Speed looked great in pre-season, and Franklin and Adams can play. Plus, we typically only have two LBs in there, and nobody’s contract is up after the year. What say you? i dont see it as a need , the upgrades i see are d-line wr and defensive back. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archer Posted October 31, 2019 Author Share Posted October 31, 2019 8 minutes ago, DEFENSE said: i dont see it as a need , the upgrades i see are d-line wr and defensive back. I agree, but I have OL depth pretty high on the list. LeRaven looked terrible in PS, and his contract is up after this year. Andrews looked serviceable at C, but very bad at OG. Only good one is Haeg, and his contract’ll be up before the draft. If we get OL injuries in the 2nd half of the season, it ain’t gonna be pretty. I’d like to get an OG to compete with Glowinski, and keep an eye open for a LT successor... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GRUMPY OLD MAN Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 49 minutes ago, Archer said: I agree, but I have OL depth pretty high on the list. LeRaven looked terrible in PS, and his contract is up after this year. Andrews looked serviceable at C, but very bad at OG. Only good one is Haeg, and his contract’ll be up before the draft. If we get OL injuries in the 2nd half of the season, it ain’t gonna be pretty. I’d like to get an OG to compete with Glowinski, and keep an eye open for a LT successor... i agree we have been lucky everyone has stayed healthy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richard pallo Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 1 hour ago, Archer said: I agree, but I have OL depth pretty high on the list. LeRaven looked terrible in PS, and his contract is up after this year. Andrews looked serviceable at C, but very bad at OG. Only good one is Haeg, and his contract’ll be up before the draft. If we get OL injuries in the 2nd half of the season, it ain’t gonna be pretty. I’d like to get an OG to compete with Glowinski, and keep an eye open for a LT successor... I agree. We have been fortunate so far but If Clark has to play we are in trouble. FA and the draft next year for the OL. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krunk Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 2 hours ago, Archer said: These mock draft tool websites (fanspeak, first-pick) seem to have LB as a big need for the Colts. Call me crazy, but I don’t see it as a need at all. Walker and Leonard are studs, Okereke has been a very pleasant surprise, Speed looked great in pre-season, and Franklin and Adams can play. Plus, we typically only have two LBs in there, and nobody’s contract is up after the year. What say you? We are fine at that spot for sure. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash7 Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 Didn't we just draft like 10 LBs this past draft. I seem to recall every draft pick was a LB. Ballard even joked about it. Okay, seriously though, I think we're good at LB. I'm thinking OL, DL, and more OL. Then receiver. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valpo2004 Posted November 1, 2019 Share Posted November 1, 2019 I mean we could stand to do better but our LB corps is pretty solid. My thoughts are D-tackles (We seem to have a solid pass rush but stopping the run is becoming an issue.), Running back depth (Wilkins just hasn't shown up much since his first game and I'd like to see more of a 1-2 punch with Mack and another RB.) And honestly I think we should aim for a QB high in the draft. I like Brissett but he doesn't IMO have a high enough ceiling. I'm welcoming him to prove me wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Four2itus Posted November 1, 2019 Share Posted November 1, 2019 We seem to struggle with depth at DB far more than the second line.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now