Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

2014 Colts = 2008 Cardinals


vinsanity

Recommended Posts

What do you guys think? With defense coming along, could be very comparable, especially in the offensive skilled positions

 

3 capable WRs with possible 1000 yards each.

Fitz vs Wayne

Boldin vs Nicks

Breaston vs Hilton

 

RB

Hightower, Edge vs Bradshaw, TRich

 

TE

Could prove themselves as reliable red zone targets

 

 

 

Food for thought I suppose

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What do you guys think? With defense coming along, could be very comparable, especially in the offensive skilled positions

 

3 capable WRs with possible 1000 yards each.

Fitz vs Wayne

Boldin vs Nicks

Breaston vs Hilton

 

RB

Hightower, Edge vs Bradshaw, TRich

 

TE

Could prove themselves as reliable red zone targets

 

 

 

Food for thought I suppose

 

Fitzgerald was probably the best receiver in the league that year, and definitely in the playoffs. So they were better than us at the top of the WR corps, but I think our #3, whoever it is, is better than Breaston was. I also think our TEs are much better. Backs might be a push, but that's to be determined.

 

The main difference is that Kurt Warner was on his way to a HOF worthy end of his career, with incredible accuracy and greater efficiency than Luck has shown to this point in his career. So this is a very ambitious comparison, to say the least. If Luck plays QB the way Warner did in 2008, then we'll all be very happy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fitzgerald was probably the best receiver in the league that year, and definitely in the playoffs. So they were better than us at the top of the WR corps, but I think our #3, whoever it is, is better than Breaston was. I also think our TEs are much better. Backs might be a push, but that's to be determined.

 

The main difference is that Kurt Warner was on his way to a HOF worthy end of his career, with incredible accuracy and greater efficiency than Luck has shown to this point in his career. So this is a very ambitious comparison, to say the least. If Luck plays QB the way Warner did in 2008, then we'll all be very happy.

 

They're (Zona) a classic example of how anything can happen in the playoffs and the best team in the league doesn't always win it.  They easily could have won that game.

 

The Ravens are another example with their last SB.

 

The only comparison with them that I want to happen is getting hot in January (and February).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Luck > Warner

Really?  That is likely a premature comparison-

 

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap1000000373865/article/hall-of-fame-class-of-2015-forecast-kurt-warner-makes-the-cut

 

I hope he does make it in.  A late start but two very productive runs with two teams.  To me, MVP is more than stat stuffing over a great number of years... but doing that helps too.

 

Hopefully down the road, Luck shows even better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Link to article   This guy likes what how Ballard has built the Colts. The Colts are far from being mediocre. JMO
    • I almost spit my coffee out reading this a few times, lol!  I love sarcasm and I especially love it when there is some truth to it!  Well played Sir!
    • I guess the whole question is the merits of the report. You report on his diabetes with tons of guesses and speculations and WITHOUT taking the side of the person who's been affected here and who's living and dealing with that condition. You report on the player being uncoachable WITHOUT taking the opinion of his coaches about being coachable or not(and BTW from what I've heard both from Colts and Texas coaches, this is resoundingly NOT TRUE). You report about him being immature and honestly, everything I've seen on the surface suggests the opposite. You report about his combine performance by giving it a pretty harsh reading(the video is in this thread and the account of what happened by McGinn is in this thread... People can actually go and look at what happened and make their own mind about whether the characterization of that workout was fair or not. I will just say you can represent the player stumbling in a drill and going again in various different ways and McGinn chose a specific way to represent it. It was the most negative way you could choose).    You know I had my own reservations about that outburst by Ballard at the presser, but the more I'm learning about Mitchell the more I actually believe in what Ballard was saying and the less merit those reports have in my mind. Maybe I have my own unconscious biases too, now that I have vested interest in Mitchell actually being good for us. I don't know     I guess ultimately none of it matters. AD's success or failure won't depend on some pre-draft reports... it will depend on how he handles himself from now on, how hard he works, his drive to be great and our staff's ability to get the best of him. 
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...