Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

The 2017 Consensus Draft Big Board: Complete 300 Player Rankings(composed of 44 draft boards)


Recommended Posts

http://zonecoverage.com/2017/featured/the-2017-consensus-big-board-complete-300-player-rankings/

 

Here's the top 30 players:

 

Rank PLAYER School Position Variance+
1 Myles Garrett Texas A&M ER 63.9
2 Solomon Thomas Stanford ER 90.4
3 Jamal Adams LSU S 120
4 Jonathan Allen Alabama DL5T 139.9
5 Malik Hooker Ohio State S 106.5
6 Marshon Lattimore Ohio State CB 94.3
7 Reuben Foster Alabama ILB 97.1
8 O.J. Howard Alabama TE 118
9 Leonard Fournette LSU RB 139
10 Corey Davis Western Michigan WRF 106.8
11 Mike Williams Clemson WRF 92.8
12 Dalvin Cook Florida State RB 114.6
13 Christian McCaffrey Stanford RB 106
14 Derek Barnett Tennessee ER 137.7
15 Gareon Conley Ohio State CB 97.4
16 Haason Reddick Temple OLB 103.6
17 Forrest Lamp Western Kentucky OG 95.1
18 David Njoku Miami (Fla.) TE 117.1
19 John Ross Washington WRF 133.2
20 Ryan Ramczyk Wisconsin OT 96.4
21 Marlon Humphrey Alabama CB 103.6
22 Deshaun Watson Clemson QB 120.5
23 Malik McDowell Michigan State DL3T 114.4
24 Cam Robinson Alabama OT 102
25 Takkarist McKinley UCLA ER 115.3
26 Mitchell Trubisky North Carolina QB 107
27 Garett Bolles Utah OT 95
28 Taco Charlton Michigan ER 113
29 Jabrill Peppers Michigan S 137.4
30 Patrick Mahomes II Texas Tech QB 134.6

 

You can find the full list on the link above.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Defjamz26 said:

Interesting that the two popular picks for the Colts in Conley and Reddick are ranked at 15 and 16 respectively. 

 

Even throw Barnett and Lamp in there at 14 and 17 respectively. 

 

If we stand pat at 15 I think there's a good chance our pick is one of these 4 players. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OffensivelyPC said:

I looked at the full list which can be found here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1EKkKqW_dmjBiNlBWzZunXaXVE_0H-PuOYt7mZorx0q8/edit#gid=1937259620

 

Doesn't really seem to be much that I thought was unusual to be honest.  Maybe it's because I've looked at so many rankings and nothing surprises me anymore.  

 

It's because it's a list averaged from every single board the guy could find. This way weird rankings from individual lists even out and you get a relatively good picture of the overall stock of players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, stitches said:

 

It's because it's a list averaged from every single board the guy could find. This way weird rankings from individual lists even out and you get a relatively good picture of the overall stock of players.

Ah, I didn't actually read the article.  Now it makes a ton of sense.  lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...