Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Conversations are moderated for civility. We ask that you please stay on topic. For more info, see our Community Guidelines ×
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum
Enter To Win 2 Tickets to Broncos @ Colts Sun 08/11 | 1:00 PM EDT

The Big “What If”

Lucky Colts Fan
 Share

Recommended Posts

Lucky Colts Fan Active Roster

Lucky Colts Fan

Posted
Posted

What if, somehow, Jim Irsay had managed to successfully keep Peyton Manning and draft Andrew Luck?

 

I saw a graphic that compared how long ago every NFL team has started a rookie QB. Colts of course did it last year with Richardson. And with Luck. And with Manning.

 

Packers haven’t started a rookie QB since like the 80s.

 

Imagine if the Colts had let Luck learn from Peyton for at least a year or two, like Rodgers did with Favre.

 

Whether it was Polian, Grigson, or Ballard, let’s assume the staff could put together a team good enough for either QB to win. After all, the Grigson Colts with Luck beat the Manning Broncos. In the Playoffs.

 

But for the sake of argument, let’s say Irsay and whatever staff he chooses re-sign Manning, draft Luck, and then actually build an OLine to protect this thrice-in-a-lifetime QB passing-of-the-torch. Manning-to-Luck joining Favre-to-Rodgers and Montana-to-Young as the top-three greatest runs of QB play in the history of the NFL.

 

The careers of both Manning and Luck might have lasted longer with even more accolades. The 2010s coulda, shoulda, and woulda been the Colts decade.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
RollerColt Ring of Honor

RollerColt

Posted
Posted

Believe it or not, but this hypothetical was a pretty real scenario for a while in the spring of 2012 before we let Manning go. Quite a bit of debate happened on this very idea. 
 

In hindsight, I’d still have to say it was for the best for Peyton. I don’t think he would’ve made it to two more Super Bowls, let alone winning another one with us. Denver was stacked and primed. All they needed was a QB to guide them. We were the opposite. We needed a total rebuild.

 

As for Luck? I could see where him sitting would’ve benefited, but would he have learned to take less hits? 
 

His rookie year was phenomenal. We went 11-5 and made the playoffs. At the time, it really felt like everything was working out for both Peyton and the Colts… 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheNewGuy Practice Squad

TheNewGuy

Posted
Posted

 Considering that Manning's neck issue was an issue, I don't see it.  I believe that the Colts had a genuine concern regarding it. If they didn't why not trade the Luck pick for a boatload of picks, or picks and player(s) to make another Superbowl run, or two, with Manning? In retrospect, and disregarding Luck's early retirement, I believe that the Colts were setting themselves up for the future...it is a shame how it all played out. Happy for PM that he won another SB though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Old Colt Practice Squad

Old Colt

Posted
Posted
12 hours ago, Lucky Colts Fan said:

What if, somehow, Jim Irsay had managed to successfully keep Peyton Manning and draft Andrew Luck?

 

I saw a graphic that compared how long ago every NFL team has started a rookie QB. Colts of course did it last year with Richardson. And with Luck. And with Manning.

 

Packers haven’t started a rookie QB since like the 80s.

 

Imagine if the Colts had let Luck learn from Peyton for at least a year or two, like Rodgers did with Favre.

 

Whether it was Polian, Grigson, or Ballard, let’s assume the staff could put together a team good enough for either QB to win. After all, the Grigson Colts with Luck beat the Manning Broncos. In the Playoffs.

 

But for the sake of argument, let’s say Irsay and whatever staff he chooses re-sign Manning, draft Luck, and then actually build an OLine to protect this thrice-in-a-lifetime QB passing-of-the-torch. Manning-to-Luck joining Favre-to-Rodgers and Montana-to-Young as the top-three greatest runs of QB play in the history of the NFL.

 

The careers of both Manning and Luck might have lasted longer with even more accolades. The 2010s coulda, shoulda, and woulda been the Colts decade.

Luck would have had more time to go Snowboarding and quit earlier.....   :worms:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • NewColtsFan
      Dline and pressure - kicking a dead horse.

      By NewColtsFan · Posted

      This may be filed under strange but true.     But I just read that the annual NFL Networks ranking of the top-100 players starts this week.   And believe it or not, our own Zaire Franklin is on the list.  He’s in the first group ranked somewhere between 81-100.   Remember, this list is created by NFL players themselves.  So Z appears to be highly regarded by his opponents.   Also, I read in the last week that the most under-rated player on the D is EJ Speed.   So perhaps those two make our defense a little better than it might appear at first glance.      Perhaps some good for thought?   Just saying….    
    • AwesomeAustin
      Dline and pressure - kicking a dead horse.

      By AwesomeAustin · Posted

      Very good points. I strongly feel the DL will again be the strength of that side of the ball. I’m expecting a top 10 performance from the front 4. I’m not as worried about the DBs as most except for health. Blackmon and Brents need to stay healthy. I expect Cross and Flowers/Jones to improve with more playing time. Moore should be solid as always. Production > potential every time but there is a lot of room for improvement out of such a young position group. Especially in the turnover category.  The linebackers are what I feel are the concern. I think they have reached their ceiling and it’s a very low ceiling. We hardly see any playmaking from this group.    To summarize, in my opinion, the DL will be good with potential to be great, secondary will be average with the potential to create turnovers and the LBs will be poor with the potential to be average. All of this will add up to a middle of the pack defense. Let’s hope the turnovers and drive stopping plays come in the second half 
    • NewColtsFan
      The colts offense met together before the start of training camp

      By NewColtsFan · Posted

      And now it comes out, the guys were/are in So Cal practicing there.   Another Pittman organized event.  Guess everyone will be back in Indy in a few days.  
    • Restinpeacesweetchloe
      Any Players Start Camp on PuP?

      By Restinpeacesweetchloe · Posted

      Smith might be the one to start on PUP. We will see though. He might be ready. Shocking that flowers seems full go.
    • smittywerb
      Dline and pressure - kicking a dead horse.

      By smittywerb · Posted

      Honestly, if Latu isn’t a certified monster on the line, I’m expecting the same also.  Marginal improvement.     And the scheme is the biggest factor in my opinion.  CBs playing 7-10 yards off the ball, suspect safety play, lack of blitzing.  Ebukam, Paye, Latu, and Lewis would have to turn into the four horseman. 

  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...