Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

PFF Scores week 3


Solid84

Recommended Posts

13 hours ago, DougDew said:

No, it isn't possible.  BUF traded a guy who wasn't playing for them, plus a draft pick, for a player that is good for kickoffs and being able to make an occasional big play because of speed. 

 

Moss is showing you what a backup RB should be, which is why I was always correct in not liking Hines, and so many others got it wrong.  Ballard finally figured it out, and some fans are starting to as well.

 

BTW, its nice to see how our LT play is elevating the entire oline success.  You know, because LT is the only oline position that, by itself, is impactful.  So when we had AC the line was good.  When he left, it sucked.  Now we have a LT who gets better grades than the LG position, and the line is pretty good again.  Its almost as if the LT play is the key to the oline and LG can be journeyman quality....almost.  Go figure. 

 

 

Oh boy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Dingus McGirt said:

Oh boy.

Well, you'll have to ask another poster why this thread includes a Nyheim Hines discussion.  It was to use Moss' play and trade to dig up an opinion I had of Hines, then claim I was wrong bout it.  Hines sucked as a runner, and everybody finally figured it out.  Moss doesn't.  There is the difference, which is why using Moss to attack my opinion of Hines makes no sense.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, DougDew said:

Well, you'll have to ask another poster why this thread includes a Nyheim Hines discussion.  It was to use Moss' play and trade to dig up an opinion I had of Hines, then claim I was wrong bout it.  Hines sucked as a runner, and everybody finally figured it out.  Moss doesn't.  There is the difference, which is why using Moss to attack my opinion of Hines makes no sense.

Heh.  I was reacting to your bringing LT & LG into the discussion.  :^)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, OffensivelyPC said:

I am really curious to see baltimore's ratings as compared to teh colts.  If there's is similar or slightly lower, or if they're higher.  Because I mean, all of our scores seemed pretty low and we won.  

Their Overall Offense grade was higher, but was mainly carried by their run game (Lamar) and run blocking - two areas the Colts lacked in. Other grades were pretty close.

Their Defense was higher almost across the board (Colts had better passrush), but that fit what we saw in game I feel.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Solid84 said:

Their Overall Offense grade was higher, but was mainly carried by their run game (Lamar) and run blocking - two areas the Colts lacked in. Other grades were pretty close.

Their Defense was higher almost across the board (Colts had better passrush), but that fit what we saw in game I feel.

I didn't see the entire game, but I assume our run defense and tackling...and their run game...was impacted by broken play scrambles by Lamar scored as rushing plays?

 

Does PFF view a broken/failed pass play QB scramble/sack escape as the "run game"?  Or as a mark against the passing game, like it probably should be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, DougDew said:

I didn't see the entire game, but I assume our run defense and tackling...and their run game...was impacted by broken play scrambles by Lamar scored as rushing plays?

 

Does PFF view a broken/failed pass play QB scramble/sack escape as the "run game"?  Or as a mark against the passing game, like it probably should be.

IIRC the two touchdown runs by Lamar were designed plays, not broken down plays?

 

I don't know to be honest. I'd think it would be classified as a run play, because a broken down play can be caused by a more than the QB - Oline protection, receiver routes etc. It could be both though? The grade for passing seems to be entirely on the QB while receivers, blocking etc. are graded separately. So, if the QB is at fault for not taking the shot and running instead it could be a knock against the passing grade but a plus for the run game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Solid84 said:

IIRC the two touchdown runs by Lamar were designed plays, not broken down plays?

 

I don't know to be honest. I'd think it would be classified as a run play, because a broken down play can be caused by a more than the QB - Oline protection, receiver routes etc. It could be both though? The grade for passing seems to be entirely on the QB while receivers, blocking etc. are graded separately. So, if the QB is at fault for not taking the shot and running instead it could be a knock against the passing grade but a plus for the run game.

Ok, that might explain this game.  I don't recall if they were designed runs or not.

 

I would think that a 20 yard scramble after the oline gave up a bad pass rush would still be categorized as bad pass blocking, and not necessarily help the run game grade (obviously not good run blocking since it was a pass play). 

 

Its a point I'm tossing around.  If a QB gets a lot of positive yards by scrambling, is that really a good thing.....if its the result of his bad passing game skills?  Its logged as rushing yards and a ypc stat.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Solid84 said:

Can't edit the OP.

 

If you want to delete the thread or edit it yourself go ahead @w87r

 

 

After getting confirmation back, I have went back and edited out the week 3 grades from the OP. I left the team stats, but please, leave those out from any team premium grades out of future post, as well. Also left the thread open to continue the good discussion that is on going.

 

As I stated before, we can't post premium content on such a large scale, like this. If you want to discuss a few players scores that is fine, but you also need to provide a link to the source. In this case it's behind a pay wall, but it will give whoever clicks a chance to pay for a subscription and get the information if they would like.

 

 

 

Like I said, I do(we all do), appreciate the work you put in here, just have to tweak the presentation a little bit.

 

I was getting ready to mess with cumulative grade through week 3 grades post.

 

If you want to do that, let me know, you can take it over.

 

Just like to keep the running total going for the season.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, w87r said:

After getting confirmation back, I have went back and edited out the week 3 grades from the OP. I left the team stats, but please leave those out from any future post. Also left thread open to continue the good discussion that is going on.

 

As I stated before, we can't post premium content on such a large scale, like this. If you want to discuss a few players scores that is fine, but you also need to provide a link to the source. In this case it's behind a pay wall, but it will give whoever clicks a chance to pay for a subscription and get the information if they would like.

 

 

 

Like I said, I do(we all do), appreciate the work you put in here, just have to tweak the presentation a little bit.

 

I was getting ready to mess with cumulative grade through week 3 grades post.

 

If you want to do that, let me know, you can take it over.

 

Just like to keep the running total going for the season.

Thanks for editing the OP. I'll do better. 

 

A heads up then. I'll wait to post PFF grades until the free stuff is out. Then I might add a few grades for a few standout guys and a link to the grades. Fair?

 

                                                                 

 

A separate thing and not PFF grades but some other statistics:

 

The Colts just posted these stats on FB

 

23 TFL (1st in NFL)

12 sacks (T-2nd in NFL)

7 FF (T-2nd in NFL)

 

That's how you do it defense!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Solid84 said:

Thanks for editing the OP. I'll do better. 

 

A heads up then. I'll wait to post PFF grades until the free stuff is out. Then I might add a few grades for a few standout guys and a link to the grades. Fair?

 

                                                                 

 

A separate thing and not PFF grades but some other statistics:

 

The Colts just posted these stats on FB

 

23 TFL (1st in NFL)

12 sacks (T-2nd in NFL)

7 FF (T-2nd in NFL)

 

That's how you do it defense!

You're good, you didn't do anything "bad". In fact it was a great write up, just have to adjust a little bit. 

 

Sounds good. Did you want to mess with the cumulative or just want me to keep doing it? Let me know, I will take care of it now if so, but if you want to, I will leave the link to my last one below.

 

 

 

 

 

As far as those defense stats, I was just looking for a good place to post them, couldn't find it so just created another thread. Like we need another one, but didn't seem like a good thread to post it in, at least not one high on the list.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, w87r said:

You're good, you didn't do anything "bad". In fact it was a great write up, just have to adjust a little bit. 

 

Sounds good. Did you want to mess with the cumulative or just want me to keep doing it? Let me know, I will take care of it now if so, but if you want to, I will leave the link to my last one below.

 

 

 

 

 

As far as those defense stats, I was just looking for a good place to post them, couldn't find it so just created another thread. Like we need another one, but didn't seem like a good thread to post it in, at least not one high on the list.

You can keep doing the cumulative if you - don’t mind the collab. haha

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Solid84 said:

You can keep doing the cumulative if you - don’t mind the collab. haha

To be honest, I just like seeing things as a whole and listed out. I can go through and look at the grades individually but it doesn't do anything for me till a write it out and see the big picture.

 

So I don't mind doing it at all, probably would still do it anyway. just didn't want you to get discouraged after putting in the good work here.

 

Looking forward to future post and the new presentation.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Team PFF scores:(positional rank) (week 1,2,3)

Top 10

Improvement from last week

Decline from last week 

Bottom 10

 

 

Offense:

QB:

Richardson - 49.3(27/32), 55.3(29/33), 55.3(30/33)

Minshew - 44.3(NR), 71.6(16/33), 58.4(29/33)

Ehlinger - (NA), (NA), (NA)

 

RB:

Moss - (NA), 63.6(30/51), 62.3(33/54)

Hull - 65.7(NR), 65.7(NR), 65.7(NR)

Funk - 63.5(NR), 63.5(NR), 63.5(NR)

Sermon - (NA), (NA), 49(NR)

Taylor - (NA), (NA), (NA)

 

WR:

Pittman - 69.4(30/110), 63.1(65/113), 67.7(48/111)

Pierce - 49.7(100/110), 51.3(102/113), 54.5(96/111)

Downs - 55.8(78/110), 64.7(57/113), 65.5(57/111)

McKenzie - 59.1(NR), 67.6(NR), 63.6(NR)

Winfree - 54.1(NR), 54.1(NR), 54.1(NR)

 

TE:

Cox - 53.3(40/63), 58(34/65), 54.6(43/69)

Granson - 61.6(27/63), 56.6(39/65), 51.1(51/69)

Ogletree - 68.2(NR), 68.2(NR), 68.4(NR)

Mallory - (NA), 88.3(NR), 88.3(NR)

Woods - (NA), (NA), (NA)

 

OT:

Raimann - 71.5(13/65), 76.9(11/71), 78.3(10/67)

Smith - 70.4(16/65), 74.9(15/71), 62.9(35/67)

Freeland - (NA), (NA), (NA)

 

OG:

Nelson - 70.9(14/65), 65(22/71), 60.4(35/76)

Fries - 55.4(42/65), 74.4(6/71), 65.5(22/76)

Sills - 58.6(NR), 58.6(NR), 48.4(NR)

Hambright - (NA), (NA), (NA)

 

OC:

Kelly - 70.6(8/32), 82.8(1/33), 82.8(1/35)

French - (NA), 46.6(NR), 43.3(35/35)

 

 

Defense:

DE:

Paye - 74.1(27/106), 75.8(29/107), 69.8(43/112)

Ekubam - 54.6(82/106), 63.9(59/107), 74.1(36/112)

Dayo - 58.3(72/106), 48(97/107), 51.3(96/112)

Lewis - 55.6(79/106), 55(88/107), 58.7(81/112)

Martin - 65.8(NR), 80.4(NR), 71.4(NR)

 

DT:

Buckner - 92.5(1/127), 88.2(6/124), 74.9(27/128)

Stewart - 90.2(3/127), 87.8(8/124), 85.5(9/128)

Bryan - 63.1(63/127),  65.3(46/124), 68.3(40/128)

Johnson - 61.0(74/127), 62.7(54/124), 49.6(101/128)

Adebawore - (NA), (NA), (NA)

 

LB:

Leonard - 66.3(37/73), 72.4(27/79), 58.6(61/77)

Franklin - 92.2(2/73), 79.9(13/79), 68.7(31/77)

Speed - 94.8(1/73), 82.3(8/79), 61.4(52/77)

Stuart - (NA), 60(NR), 56.7(NR)

 

CB:

Baker - 44.8(87/92), 32.6(97/98), 32.6(104/105)

Flowers - 53.6(69/92), 59.6(60/98), 65.5(42/105)

Moore - 57.3(62/92), 64.3(39/98), 69.2(33/105)

Jones - 60.0(NR), 60(NR), 60(NR)

Brown - 78.3(NR), 78.3(NR), 78.3(NR)

Brents - (NA), (NA), 87.6(NR)

 

S:

Blackmon - 53.6(64/79), 61.6(54/79) 61.7(54/85)

Thomas - 43.8(72/79), 50.8(72/79), 44.5(81/85)

Cross - (NA), 60.5(NR), 61.1(NR)

Denbow - (NA), (NA), (NA)

 

K:

Gay - 63.5(NR), 68.2(NR), 90.4(NR)

 

P:

Sanchez  - 60.9(19/29), 64.9(14/29), 66(18/32)

 

 

 

Notes:

We have the 1st and the worst Center's

Grover holding tight in top 10

Raimann moved up into top 10

Had (3) top 30 LBs after last week, this week (0)

Ekubam keeping his upward trajectory, moved to top ranked Edge on team after 3 weeks.

Top 3 WRs all improved overall season grades

Bottom fell out on Speed and Smith this week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, w87r said:

Team PFF scores:(positional rank) (week 1-3)

Top 10

Improvement from last week

Decline from last week 

Bottom 10

 

 

Offense:

QB:

Richardson - 49.3(27/32), 55.3(29/33), 55.3(30/33)

Minshew - 44.3(NR), 71.6(16/33), 58.4(29/33)

Ehlinger - (NA), (NA), (NA)

 

RB:

Moss - (NA), 63.6(30/51), 62.3(33/54)

Hull - 65.7(NR), 65.7(NR), 65.7(NR)

Funk - 63.5(NR), 63.5(NR), 63.5(NR)

Sermon - (NA), (NA), 49(NR)

Taylor - (NA), (NA), (NA)

 

WR:

Pittman - 69.4(30/110), 63.1(65/113), 67.7(48/111)

Pierce - 49.7(100/110), 51.3(102/113), 54.5(96/111)

Downs - 55.8(78/110), 64.7(57/113), 65.5(57/111)

McKenzie - 59.1(NR), 67.6(NR), 63.6(NR)

Winfree - 54.1(NR), 54.1(NR), 54.1(NR)

 

TE:

Cox - 53.3(40/63), 58(34/65), 54.6(43/69)

Granson - 61.6(27/63), 56.6(39/65), 51.1(51/69)

Ogletree - 68.2(NR), 68.2(NR), 68.4(NR)

Mallory - (NA), 88.3(NR), 88.3(NR)

Woods - (NA), (NA), (NA)

 

OT:

Raimann - 71.5(13/65), 76.9(11/71), 78.3(10/67)

Smith - 70.4(16/65), 74.9(15/71), 62.9(35/67)

Freeland - (NA), (NA), (NA)

 

OG:

Nelson - 70.9(14/65), 65(22/71), 60.4(35/76)

Fries - 55.4(42/65), 74.4(6/71), 65.5(22/76)

Sills - 58.6(NR), 58.6(NR), 48.4(NR)

Hambright - (NA), (NA), (NA)

 

OC:

Kelly - 70.6(8/32), 82.8(1/33), 82.8(1/35)

French - (NA), 46.6(NR), 43.3(35/35)

 

 

Defense:

DE:

Paye - 74.1(27/106), 75.8(29/107), 69.8(43/112)

Ekubam - 54.6(82/106), 63.9(59/107), 74.1(36/112)

Dayo - 58.3(72/106), 48(97/107), 51.3(96/112)

Lewis - 55.6(79/106), 55(88/107), 58.7(81/112)

Martin - 65.8(NR), 80.4(NR), 71.4(NR)

 

DT:

Buckner - 92.5(1/127), 88.2(6/124), 74.9(27/128)

Stewart - 90.2(3/127), 87.8(8/124), 85.5(9/128)

Bryan - 63.1(63/127),  65.3(46/124), 68.3(40/128)

Johnson - 61.0(74/127), 62.7(54/124), 49.6(101/128)

Adebawore - (NA), (NA), (NA)

 

LB:

Leonard - 66.3(37/73), 72.4(27/79), 58.6(61/77)

Franklin - 92.2(2/73), 79.9(13/79), 68.7(31/77)

Speed - 94.8(1/73), 82.3(8/79), 61.4(52/77)

Stuart - (NA), 60(NR), 56.7(NR)

 

CB:

Baker - 44.8(87/92), 32.6(97/98), 32.6(104/105)

Flowers - 53.6(69/92), 59.6(60/98), 65.5(42/105)

Moore - 57.3(62/92), 64.3(39/98), 69.2(33/105)

Jones - 60.0(NR), 60(NR), 60(NR)

Brown - 78.3(NR), 78.3(NR), 78.3(NR)

Brents - (NA), (NA), 87.6(NR)

 

S:

Blackmon - 53.6(64/79), 61.6(54/79) 61.7(54/85)

Thomas - 43.8(72/79), 50.8(72/79), 44.5(81/85)

Cross - (NA), 60.5(NR), 61.1(NR)

Denbow - (NA), (NA), (NA)

 

K:

Gay - 63.5(NR), 68.2(NR), 90.4(NR)

 

P:

Sanchez  - 60.9(19/29), 64.9(14/29), 66(18/32)

 

 

 

Notes:

We have the 1st and the worst Center's

Grover holding tight in top 10

Raimann moved up into top 10

Had (3) top 30 LBs after last week, this week (0)

Ekubam keeping his upward trajectory, moved to top ranked Edge on team after 3 weeks.

Top 3 WRs all improved overall season grades

Bottom fell out on Speed and Smith this week.

Ballard was right to trust Raimann with the LT position. He’s been of our best players these past 3 weeks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I will say this. AR imo threw the ball much MUCH better in his 4 games last year compared to his first 3 this year.  Not even close.   I have to believe a lot of that is due to him being unable to practice much on his mechanics until August or so.  Remember even during spring practice he was complaining of a sore shoulder and had to take some time off.   I fully believe that once he is totally over his injury that he will be able to take the extra reps needed to get back into a way of throwing without having to think so much.   I play a sport at a highly competitive level, won't say which one, but I broke my thumb this spring and I just now am start to get back into the swing of things.  But I am not even close to where I was before I broke it. 
    • Do you honestly think the Colts will win a SB, let alone make the playoffs....with Joe Flacco as QB?  I mean are you seriously pining for a 39 year old retread ala Matt Ryan to lead this team????   I am at a loss for that and the only thing that makes any sense is your complete dislike for AR is clouding your judgement.    AR is the future of this team.  He has a high ceiling and with him, and IF he progresses, the team could be a SB contender in a year or 2.  But with or without him there is no way in H E double toothpicks that this team wins a SB this year.  Just not enough ELITE talent on the team.  Honestly the only truly elite player on the entire team as of today is JT.  AR could be.  Not now but could be.   Besides that?  Nobody.  By elite I mean game changing talent.    So you ride with AR, hope he stays healthy and finishes the season, and improves. He makes good decisions for the most part.  The INT in the endzone today was not a good one but for the most part he does.  He just needs to gain experience and technique.    But saying JF should start, when at best....I mean AT BESt ALL HE DOES IS GET YOU into the first round of the playoffs?  Who cares.   I would rather see progression from AR, even it means suffering through a lot of losses, and get a high pick for next year rather than go through a 9-8 season with JF.  Remember the first Manning year he was not good, but he gained tons of experience.  We then got a super high draft pick where we drafted Edge the and we were off to the races after that.   I mean, haven't you had enough of Rivers, Wentz, Ryan and Mishew?  I cannot honestly believe people want to go back to that.   FJ is Matt Ryan PERSONIFIED. 
    • One progress I see is that he's finishing games so that's a step. The shoulder surgery and offseason rehab has definitely set him back for a raw guy who needs all the reps he can get. It was reported that AR has a total of 30 something starts at qb INCLUDING hs. Think about that most have that in high school alone. Caleb Williams is the 2nd youngest starting qb in the league and had 33 starts in college alone while winning a Heisman trophy. AR is the youngest starting qb in the league at just 22 but has extreme talent and natural gifts that have to be developed.   I think the staff is doing him a disservice by taking away the threat of his legs (see Lamar) because he is not a pocket passer. I think AR needs a go to TE and the Colts need to rely on the run more with JT until AR catches up from his lost rehab time. Give him some easy short throws to build his confidence before he starts throwing into coverage take the Josh Allen approach.   The biggest problem is that Ballard chose a project in AR instead of moving up to snag the polished CJ Stroud. Most teams move up to get their franchise guy unless they already have the number one pick overall. The reason why it's problem is that the fan base is starting to get restless and the thought of another few years of unfulfilled promise seems discouraging.   Once Ballard chose to sit pat AR was the right choice over the awful Will Levis who was a strong possibility if not for Shane according to Shefty and Will's people. Bottom line is that this will take time. Is the overall team good enough to make a push while AR goes through his growing pains to reach his full potential? I doubt it because Ballard's tenure has been spun in mediocrity at best.  
    • Honestly no, but then I didn’t expect to see any progress yet either. He basically lost an entire season and offseason because of injury.    I’ll be more concerned if there’s no progress next season.    What I think is much more of a concern this season is that Steichen’s playcalling seems to have regressed badly. I expected a vastly different offense than what we’re playing and I don’t think Steichen is helping AR at all. 
    • To me, this is still his rookie year. When you are rehabbing an injury, you are not getting better at football. He has basically played 7 NFL games with 0 offseason to work on the things we KNEW he needed to work on (hence why he was considered a project QB). I will reserve my judgement for him next year given he has a chance at a healthy offseason. 
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...