Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Mock Draft 1.0 And 2.0 W/comp


Recommended Posts

Mock 1.1

1. Andrew Luck QB

2. Janoris Jenkins CB

3. Alamada Ta'amu NT

4. AJ Jenkins WR

5. Nicolas Jean Baptiste NT

5. James Hanna TE

6. Kellen Moore QB

7. Donte Paige Moss LB

7. Beau Reliford TE

7. Chris Owusu WR

Mock 1.2

1. Andrew Luck QB

2. Rueben Randle WR

3. Chase Minnifield CB

4. Michael Egnew TE

5. Loni Fangupo NT

5. Marquis Maze WR

6. Akiem Hicks NT

7. DeAngelo Peterson TE

7. Robert Blanton CB

7. BJ Cunningham WR

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I kind of like both drafts except for Kellen Moore. I can't ever see him as a starter.

Yea, I kno there are gonna be a lot of ppl that dont like that pick, but I just kinda put him in there cuz Id like to have him as our back up. I dont expect us to get him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I cant see Moore at all except PS and 1.2 i cant see drafting a WR or TE over more pressing needs in CB and NT. BPA doesnt always fit a teams needs.IF we could sign a NT and CB then WR would make sense but LB needs are also needed for 3-4 ours are tiny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I cant see Moore at all except PS and 1.2 i cant see drafting a WR or TE over more pressing needs in CB and NT. BPA doesnt always fit a teams needs.IF we could sign a NT and CB then WR would make sense but LB needs are also needed for 3-4 ours are tiny.

I actually think we are pretty well set at LB, I could see maybe drafting 1. I think if the right reciever drops to round 2 we would * him up, same thing with TE. I think if Fleener is there, it would make be such a great fit, there would be no way around picking him. What is a way to get your rookie QB comfortable right off the bat? Draft his biggest weapon, who is also a physical freak of a TE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually think we are pretty well set at LB, I could see maybe drafting 1. I think if the right reciever drops to round 2 we would * him up, same thing with TE. I think if Fleener is there, it would make be such a great fit, there would be no way around picking him. What is a way to get your rookie QB comfortable right off the bat? Draft his biggest weapon, who is also a physical freak of a TE.

Set for 4-3 non tackling machines? 3-4 we have LB needs so many people can only think offence when a good and great def will win games also.Then if u balance like i hope for we have a team that is much much more enjoying to watch.How many times have we all cringed when our tampa 2 hit the field to play 12 yards back waiting on a screen or lil slant pass that kills us everytime?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Set for 4-3 non tackling machines? 3-4 we have LB needs so many people can only think offence when a good and great def will win games also.Then if u balance like i hope for we have a team that is much much more enjoying to watch.How many times have we all cringed when our tampa 2 hit the field to play 12 yards back waiting on a screen or lil slant pass that kills us everytime?

Which LB do you want to replace? I think Conner and Angerer will do very well in the 3-4, I would draft a MLB, but the class this year isn't strong, so we could wait until aroun 4th - 5th round and get someone like Audie Cole. For OLB Freeney and Mathis are basically slated in there already, unless you think we should bench one of those 2 and draft an OLB? And just because they played off the ball that far, doesn't mean they will under the new scheme, since that is what they were coached to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Are you saying that Ballard read the landscape and decided it was safe to trade down to 52 and still get ADM?  Nothing in his interview supports that.   Whose to say that if Ballard trades down once again because he thought no team would take a WR in the 2nd, that a team like SF now sees value in ADM, and possibly reevaluates and pushes to trade Deebo or Ayiuk.  Teams, draft boards can change as the draft is happening, and Ballard is right to say that nobody knows how this stuff will play out.  He doesn't know that another team won't trade up to 53, or 47 for that matter.
    • Ranked on their draft boards or ranked in terms of being an NFL prospect?  Yes, those aren't the same things.   In terms of NFL prospects, yes, I think all teams have pretty much the same 250 players ranked in pretty much the same order.  That's what the "Top 100 prospects means".  Its prospects.  Of course, they are more certain about the players they have ranked highly than the players they have ranked lower.  The margin of error for the lower players is higher than it is for the higher players, so there is a chance that a player with a 7th round grade by one team gets selected in the 5th round by another, over a 5th round ranking guy getting selected in the 3rd round by another.  I'd wager that teams have their top 25 ranked pretty much the same.   I'm speaking in terms of understanding the players' attributes, talents, Character risks, and abilities to play in the NFL...which is NOT the same as their draft boards...meaning who they might want to actually draft.   Draft boards would be based upon those attributes combined with the uniqueness of the teams,  So even though a team may think Marvin Harrison is the number 1 prospect, they may choose to pick their number 12 ranked prospect guy JJ McCarthy.  Knowing talent and needs, they probably have JJ higher on their Draft board than MHJ.    But no, I do not think that each team knows how the other 31 teams have their draft boards ranked, with any degree of certainty.   I think every GM had ADM ranked as a prospect the same as every other, in terms of risks, talents, etc.  The team that actually picked him has unique reasons for picking him.  And if you put almost ay other GM in the place of Ballard at the time, who understands the Colts, he would have picked ADM for the Colts too.  And they too would have felt lucky that their, say, 35th ranked prospect was still available at pick 52.  Ballard said that "nobody has any idea how this stuff plays out"  Its not my opinion to argue with.  I'm trying to help those on the forum understand what he's saying, even if it conflicts with the opinions they've held for years.       So you judge the validity of a post based upon consensus?  That's all you got?  Yeah, ok, the consensus apparently does not agree with me.  Big deal.
    • Looking forward to watching it later.  Love when the colts do this.  
  • Members

    • CardiacColts

      CardiacColts 340

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • rob220

      rob220 1

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • MFT5

      MFT5 325

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • krunk

      krunk 8,352

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 19,724

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Colt Overseas

      Colt Overseas 1,332

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • legend300

      legend300 137

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ColtsGermany

      ColtsGermany 1,009

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IinD

      IinD 4,480

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Mr. Irrelevant

      Mr. Irrelevant 952

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...