How did Henry Anderson not fit our Defensive scheme

[HarryTheCat]

On 9/10/2018 at 8:38 PM, Luck 4 president said:

He’s killing it. Questionable moves by CB 

But...but...but...CB is a genius, right? He can gaze into his crystal ball and spot hidden talent that no mere mortal sees. The Nostradamus of draft picks. The Edgar Cayce of free agency.  The Da Vinci of the depths of the depth chart. With a flick of the wrist, the grandmaster of roster moves arrays the chess pieces of the practice squad as deftly as Bobby Fischer destroying Boris Spassky in Iceland.

 

Oh, well. At least he's not Grigson.

[Defjamz26]

I’m not sure if it’s remnants of Grigson support or some sort of bias towards the man, but every week people find something new to blame Ballard for. You guys keep creating these false narratives about the players he let’s go, while ignoring the truth.

 

He cut Hankins who has done nothing but sit at home. He hasn’t gotten so much as a team visit. He cut Simon, and we watched Hunt get 2 sacks in the season opener. Simon is also unemployed ATM. Anderson has one productive game for the Jets and all of a sudden, he was a huge loss despite the fact that he plays in a 3-4 now. Melvin hasn’t done anything notable with the Raiders either (and remember Ballard DID offer him a contract, and for more money).

 

But go ahead and keep selling this Ballard narrative.

[TheMarine]

I loved the way Henry played for us while he was here. That said: 68 tackles, 3 sacks in 3 years. Yes, complete mistake to cut him    

 

 

Wait... people are that worked up about losing 68 tackles and 3 sacks... in 3 years? And not batting an eye when we let Eric Walden walk after getting 10 sacks?

 

Welp, at least we're consistent with the outrage