I think both. I believe the judge could order a new trial. But I also read that he thought the plaintiff's expert witnesses were under qualified and not credible, and those witnesses were the backbone of the case. I don't know all the ins and outs, I'll keep following it though.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now