-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
-
Thread of the Week
-
Topics
-
-
Posts
-
By Yoshinator · Posted
I disagree for several reasons. 1.) We have Cross, Thomas, and Simpson at FS. All are young. I want to see a battle between the 3 to see who can start and if any are any good. 2.) We have Blackmon at SS, we don't need two veterans. 3.) We need a veteran at CB that can not only improve our CB play, but that the young CB group can learn from. 4.) I feel Baker can be cut easily if we sign a veteran CB and I'm not sure if Flowers will be 100% right away. There's just so many more reasons to go after a CB than a FS IMO. -
By MikeCurtis · Posted
I give it an A+ The draft shouldn't be measured in April, but on the surface, it appears we did great, and filled to glaring holes at DE and WR I REALLY think that we need to add that vet FS, to complete this offseason -
By MikeCurtis · Posted
He read the board right, BUT....... If another team would have traded into those spots, we would have missed on a player that I think COULD be a Moss type reciever -
-
Maybe? I think he just read the board well, and he probably liked 2 WRs there. Corley was the next WR taken after Mitchell and not till the first pick of the 3rd round.(12 picks from Mitchell's spot, 18 picks from #46) Another receiver wasn't drafted in the 2nd after Mitchell
-
-
Members
-
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now