Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Elliot 18 carries 87 yards


NannyMcafee

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

I don’t mean to be argumentative....

 

But I don’t know that we held Zeke Elliott to anything.   18 carries and 87 yards is nearly 5 yards per carry.   If the Cowboys had given him three more carries Elliott would’ve had more than 100 yards.

 

Yes,  a fantastic effort from our defense but I think Dallas helped by not using Zeke more often.

 

 

Youre talking about situational football. The reason they had to stop using Elliot was because they didn’t score a TD for 3 and a half  quarters which is when they stopped running. Don’t forget the cowboys have an above average offense and defense. They do have the ability to score points. 

 

By using this same logic I declare Leonard would have gotten a couple sacks if the we would have been more selective with our blitz packages.

 

The Colts won situational football today plain and simple, 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

I don’t mean to be argumentative....

 

But I don’t know that we held Zeke Elliott to anything.   18 carries and 87 yards is nearly 5 yards per carry.   If the Cowboys had given him three more carries Elliott would’ve had more than 100 yards.

 

Yes,  a fantastic effort from our defense but I think Dallas helped by not using Zeke more often.

 

I want to understand your position so help me...

 

You're saying the Cowboys stopped using Zeke because they just decided to stop using him or because using him wasn't working? You are aware that the Cowboys use Zeke more than any other team uses their RBs (30 more carries than Gurley at #2)? 

 

Your position is, a team that uses their RB more than any other team in the league decided that even though Zeke was effective (per your post) and would continue to be effective they just decided....to...stop....running...him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Am I the only one who really hopes AR and Steichen end up being a success story and this hypothetical Ballard firing doesn’t happen? 
    • You were picking better than me most weeks, just had unfortunate luck once or twice, I definitely earned that last spot. My average was pretty bad week after week. 
    • You are missing out a rather LARGE piece of the puzzle in your factoring here. We had last season's win numbers with GARDNER FREAKING MINSHEW at QB practically the whole season. Love the guy and what he did for us last season, but he isn't exactly a world beater at the QB position. AR brings such a different dynamic to this offense and teamm, Shane is going to be chomping at the bit to get started this season. The sample size we saw from AR last season was small, but it was definitely encouraging - especially considering we were all expecting him to be much more raw and inaccuarte. He basically red-shirted last year, learning the NFL game and in Steichen's ear the whole time, while learning the playbook inside out.  Our team has fundamentally stayed the same as last season, which damn near won the AFC South with Gardner at QB for the love of god. Now we add AR to that mix, as well as some very interesting additions in Mitchell and Latu who could have very meaningful impacts. The fact that we are so under the radar is almost laughable - AFC South isnt going to know what hit it. 
    • Great points!  I would assume the Irsay’s would conduct the interviews. If Steichen is given more control he would as well or the new GM could decide his fate like Ballard did with Pagano. Several ways it can go and we are a few years away from it even happening so who really knows. I’m hoping none of it matters and the team becomes a true contender and this discussion is merely killing time. 
    • I would say "hire the best who's available for the job". If all the good / great GM candidates are gone, you're stuck hiring someone like Grigson (or maybe someone from this forum).   I often wonder, who's the best candidate to hire for an impossible job? Someone who can make the impossible, possible?
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...