TKnight24 Posted August 31, 2014 Share Posted August 31, 2014 @ColtsConti: Jersey # updates for the Colts: #23 Loucheiz Purifoy, #48 Mario Harvey, #95 Montori HughesSo:Purifoy: #23Mario Harvey: #48Montori Hughes: #95Maybe a couple more players will change their numbers now that there's a lot more to choose from Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CR91 Posted August 31, 2014 Share Posted August 31, 2014 I always like seeing the UDFA get their new jersey numbers. kinda like a welcome to the team ceremony. im surprised kerr didnt change his number. also thats weird how they allowed hughes to take moala's number. guess that means hes not in the future plans Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TKnight24 Posted August 31, 2014 Author Share Posted August 31, 2014 I always like seeing the UDFA get their new jersey numbers. kinda like a welcome to the team ceremony. im surprised kerr didnt change his numberThere's still time to do so. But I knew Purifoy wasn't gonna ride with #6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ColtsLegacy Posted August 31, 2014 Share Posted August 31, 2014 There's still time to do so. But I knew Purifoy wasn't gonna ride with #6 6 is not a legal number for a CB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CR91 Posted August 31, 2014 Share Posted August 31, 2014 There's still time to do so. But I knew Purifoy wasn't gonna ride with #6 he couldnt even if he wanted to. perhaps kerr wanted 94 so hughes changed to 95 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jriddy5000son Posted August 31, 2014 Share Posted August 31, 2014 Anyone else hate that Walden is 93? I mean c'mon, that should be retired. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CR91 Posted August 31, 2014 Share Posted August 31, 2014 Anyone else hate that Walden is 93? I mean c'mon, that should be retired. you cant retire every number. 88 isnt even officially retired. wouldnt have even bothered me if nicks chose to wear it. I think if we resign him to a longer contract next year, he will take 88 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jriddy5000son Posted August 31, 2014 Share Posted August 31, 2014 Yeah I get we can't retire everything. But no one should wear 88. At least for 10 years or so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TKnight24 Posted August 31, 2014 Author Share Posted August 31, 2014 Yeah I get we can't retire everything. But no one should wear 88. At least for 10 years or so.The number doesn't make the player, the player makes the number Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CR91 Posted August 31, 2014 Share Posted August 31, 2014 Yeah I get we can't retire everything. But no one should wear 88. At least for 10 years or so. its almost been 10 years since marv was released Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gramz Posted August 31, 2014 Share Posted August 31, 2014 The number doesn't make the player, the player makes the numberThat's what people are saying, and Marvin Harrison definitely made the #88.... ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jriddy5000son Posted August 31, 2014 Share Posted August 31, 2014 Okay then 20 lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jriddy5000son Posted August 31, 2014 Share Posted August 31, 2014 The number doesn't make the player, the player makes the numberAnd that player made that number Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TKnight24 Posted August 31, 2014 Author Share Posted August 31, 2014 And that player made that numberHarrison? YesFreeney in the new regime? NoWalden had 93 in GB, so let him have his 93 in Indy. Freeney was just our sack master, nothing elseHarrison was....... Well words can't describe Harrison Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jriddy5000son Posted August 31, 2014 Share Posted August 31, 2014 Harrison? YesFreeney in the new regime? NoWalden had 93 in GB, so let him have his 93 in Indy. Freeney was just our sack master, nothing elseHarrison was....... Well words can't describe Harrison"Just" our sack master? Sure he couldn't adapt to 3-4, but it doesn't take away from his legacy, which is huge.And for the record, sack master was literally his only job. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TKnight24 Posted August 31, 2014 Author Share Posted August 31, 2014 "Just" our sack master? Sure he couldn't adapt to 3-4, but it doesn't take away from his legacy, which is huge.Sacks: His Legacy You can throw in the spin move if you want but Freeney was only good for sacks. Wasn't exactly good against the run Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jriddy5000son Posted August 31, 2014 Share Posted August 31, 2014 Find me many pass rushing specialist that are. We can have opinions, that's or right as fans, but I hold Freeney in very high regard as a fan. He was an amazing talent and should be treated as such by the fans of this team. It's not his fault Dungy didn't give him squat aside from Mathis and Sanders. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ColtsLegacy Posted August 31, 2014 Share Posted August 31, 2014 Find me many pass rushing specialist that are. We can have opinions, that's or right as fans, but I hold Freeney in very high regard as a fan. He was an amazing talent and should be treated as such by the fans of this team. It's not his fault Dungy didn't give him squat aside from Mathis and Sanders. Don't waste your breath (fingers?) on TKnight, he's too young to remember Freeney at the top of his game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coltsfansince65 Posted August 31, 2014 Share Posted August 31, 2014 Sorry but I'm old school. I still think John Macky when I see #88. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superman Posted August 31, 2014 Share Posted August 31, 2014 its almost been 10 years since marv was released Umm, naw. He was released after 2008. It's been five. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CR91 Posted August 31, 2014 Share Posted August 31, 2014 Umm, naw. He was released after 2008. It's been five. I was thinking 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superman Posted August 31, 2014 Share Posted August 31, 2014 I was thinking 6 Me too. When I counted it out, it's only 5. Still, 6 is a bit away from 10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now