Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Matt Gay the highest paid kicker in the NFL


Recommended Posts

Just now, ColtStrong2013 said:

Adios amigo. We’re both stubborn. No one is going to win here. You play the hindsight and what-if game. I don’t.

Not hindsight if said it at the time which most here did but as all know I'm a big stats guy (among biggest here) and risk went against the numbers and didnt pay off. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, holeymoley99 said:

Not hindsight if said it at the time which most here did but as all know I'm a big stats guy (among biggest here) and risk went against the numbers and didnt pay off. 


cool. What was Minshew’s stats- 3rd down conversions- red zone %? Just curious… you know the stats that actually make up the difference in the game and certainly did last night. Not the risk/reward of a fieldgoal try to take the lead. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ColtStrong2013 said:


cool. What was Minshew’s stats- 3rd down conversions- red zone %? Just curious… you know the stats that actually make up the difference in the game and certainly did last night. Not the risk/reward of a fieldgoal try to take the lead. 

Changing subject partly is fine.....Minshew was awful as I also said last night, in fact his misplaced easy throw cost us the first down late in the game making a routine catch into a very difficult one.. HOWEVER to say a missed fg as opposed to punt deep doesnt make a difference in a close game is an argument you would be all alone in making and for good reason, no logic to this reasoning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, holeymoley99 said:

Changing subject partly is fine.....Minshew was awful as I also said last night, in fact his misplaced easy throw cost us the first down late in the game making a routine catch into a very difficult one.. HOWEVER to say a missed fg as opposed to punt deep doesnt make a difference in a close game is an argument you would be all alone in making and for good reason, no logic to this reasoning.


its not changing subject. The subject is kicking a fieldgoal versus punting. You claim it didn’t make sense because risk/reward. I claim your numbers don’t factor in the poor scoring performance our offense was showing. We couldn’t convert 3rd downs. We couldn’t score in the redzone. Our qb was throwing over heads and out bounds, completely not seeing wide open receivers. We had made two field goals already and felt the points were needed versus cj stroud. Shane Steichen didn’t agree with your analysis on the risk/reward not being worth the attempt. Points were at a premium for our offense. If not for a solid defensive effort, we would have been smoked last night and not because we missed a 57 yard fg instead of punting. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, ColtStrong2013 said:


its not changing subject. The subject is kicking a fieldgoal versus punting. You claim it didn’t make sense because risk/reward. I claim your numbers don’t factor in the poor scoring performance our offense was showing. We couldn’t convert 3rd downs. We couldn’t score in the redzone. Our qb was throwing over heads and out bounds, completely not seeing wide open receivers. We had made two field goals already and felt the points were needed versus cj stroud. Shane Steichen didn’t agree with your analysis on the risk/reward not being worth the attempt. Points were at a premium for our offense. If not for a solid defensive effort, we would have been smoked last night and not because we missed a 57 yard fg instead of punting. 

If we had punted them deep we change field  position and probably get it back in great field position. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ColtStrong2013 said:


its not changing subject. The subject is kicking a fieldgoal versus punting. You claim it didn’t make sense because risk/reward. I claim your numbers don’t factor in the poor scoring performance our offense was showing. We couldn’t convert 3rd downs. We couldn’t score in the redzone. Our qb was throwing over heads and out bounds, completely not seeing wide open receivers. We had made two field goals already and felt the points were needed versus cj stroud. Shane Steichen didn’t agree with your analysis on the risk/reward not being worth the attempt. Points were at a premium for our offense. If not for a solid defensive effort, we would have been smoked last night and not because we missed a 57 yard fg instead of punting. 

I never claimed we converted 3rd downs nor played good redzone ball However if scoring is at a premium it doesnt make take a low risk field goal and give opponent good field position in fact the opposite, dont give the short field make them go long instead. The risk didnt pay off so S.S. was wrong. Majority here felt as I did not worth it SO is hindsight ......

hindsight. / (ˈhaɪndˌsaɪt) / noun. the ability to understand, after something has happened, what should have been done or what caused the event.

 

It was said before the miss even took place, if was saying yes kick then after oh we should have punted then it becomes hindsight and if that occured and you had an issue you would the be 100% right in having issue, it did not though.

Just now, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

If we had punted them deep we change field  position and probably get it back in great field position. 

Most understand this thank you, some pushing a different agenda will not admit it though unfortunately.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

If we had punted them deep we change field  position and probably get it back in great field position. 


Thats still putting faith in stopping cj stroud, and then having your quarterback get you in scoring position again. They wanted the points, not the field position… clearly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ColtStrong2013 said:


Thats still putting faith in stopping cj stroud, and then having your quarterback get you in scoring position again. They wanted the points, not the field position… clearly

So just give it to them at mid field. What planet does that make sense.  That was a very iffy FG.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, holeymoley99 said:

if scoring is at a premium it doesnt make take a low risk field goal and give opponent good field position in fact the opposite, dont give the short field make them go long instead.


it makes sense to try and score when you get an opportunity that you don’t feel confident you are going to get too many times in the ballgame… I think it’s pretty obvious that was the case. Especially when the opposing qb was performing the way he was. 

points over field position when you can’t sustain a drive and get into scoring position in the first place… 

 

2 minutes ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

So just give it to them at mid field. What planet does that make sense.  That was a very iffy FG.


one where your quarterback cannot sustain a drive Chloe. That’s the world we lived in last night. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ColtStrong2013 said:


it makes sense to try and score when you get an opportunity that you don’t feel confident you are going to get too many times in the ballgame… I think it’s pretty obvious that was the case. Especially when the opposing qb was performing the way he was. 

points over field position when you can’t sustain a drive and get into scoring position in the first place… 

 


one where your quarterback cannot sustain a drive Chloe. That’s the world we lived in last night. 

If your QB can’t sustain a drive and your field goal kicker has been hit or miss from that distance you pin them deep.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

If your QB can’t sustain a drive and your field goal kicker has been hit or miss from that distance you pin them deep.


again- trusting gay over his offense to get in scoring position and possibly for the defense continue holding stroud regardless of field position. 

 

We are acting like it wasn’t inches and that he didn’t hit a 52 yarder in the game… it was a higher percentage chance of scoring than anything else we had last night aside from JT busting a touchdown run… which he did once. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • indeed! I am a general contractor and I call tell you I don’t make bank…but I do work my ***** off. Electricians, plumbers, and HVAC, along with welders can make some absolutely great money if they own a company and grow it to a pretty decent size. But yea…I’m a peasant compared to many, but I’m sure there are plenty who feel like a peasant compared to me…but again I just think it’s absolutely absurd the amount of money athletes (particularly in the NFL, NBA, and MLB) make.  
    • Ya-Sin was acquired by the Raiders ahead of the 2022 season - correlated to the downtrend starting with 2022, into 2023. 
    • I am not sure in what order my top 10 would be but Mahomes has to be #1, doesn't he?
    • Well….  That wouldn’t have been my top-4, or yours either.   And I think it’s a bad look for the Network.   But it is what it is….    🙄.   🙄.   
    • @w87r   So, let's not derail this and make it a ballard thread, because we know how that goes. But I will respond to a couple of your questions, and then move on.    What about Brents and Jones?   I just forgot to throw them at the bottom. Every other guy's fate is known, so I was posting that. We could add them at the bottom, but the jury is out on both.  Cross could almost fit into that group.. but even ballard is on record saying he needs more consistency. I think with more discipline Cross could honestly develop into something special.    Kind of a confusing take looking back at it? Guess I need to go back and see if I'm missing something? I was thinking it was more of a argument against Ballard bringing in good secondary talent? When laid out, and even self admitted  by ( @AKB ) good pickups seem to outweigh the bad pick ups on the original list.?    origian post - first line "maybe he's just not that good at dealing with safety or secondaries in general.  (I might be off by like a year on one or two)"(overall success percentage vs pass)   tjhe best corners we've had are all from other teams. Rhodes, Gilmore, Moore. I give him more credit for moore because of how young he was. As for Rock ya sin, he traded him away for a pass rusher who got most of his sacks with us in garbage time. Of course, my opinion. Going back I would prefer to keep Rock than get Yannick. The issue we have with our secondary honestly probably started there.    As for Rodgers, sure. I was a big fan of him. Athletic freak, and a great returner. I'm not blaming Ballard for every single player's fate on that list. I simply listed it out, from my perspective.   George Odum - I acknowledge he was a great teamer. but how great of a safety was he? the main point is that he saw playing time because we had no one better. And if we saw him as a starting safety we would have given him more than what you pay a gunner. which we didn't, because we saw him as a teamer, not a starter.    In conclusion, my point is that we have yet to have a unit of secondary. It's always been a hodge podge from Pierre Desir, Hairston, and Carrie, to Facyson - you can call them depth but all of them played significant time. You can call George Odum depth, but he played significant time.  (Rock, Moore, and Rodgers the closest we came to a 'unit')   If you like it, great. I think it is subpar and has been.      We did have a three year stint (19-21) where our secondary was on the edge of top 10 for about 3 years in a row. so I'm not oblivious to some of the success he has had. but right now, is probably the worst state we've been in, and looking back over the years paints the picture clear.  Here's some more numbers    ### **Pass Yards Allowed** - **2017**: 21st - **2018**: 24th - **2019**: 7th - **2020**: 11th - **2021**: 10th - **2022**: 18th - **2023**: 29th   ### **Pass Defense Efficiency (Opponent Passer Rating Allowed)** - **2017**: 18th - **2018**: 20th - **2019**: 5th - **2020**: 11th - **2021**: 10th - **2022**: 20th - **2023**: 30th   ### **Interceptions** - **2017**: 30th (7 interceptions) - **2018**: 28th (8 interceptions) - **2019**: 9th (15 interceptions) - **2020**: 15th (12 interceptions) - **2021**: 13th (15 interceptions) - **2022**: 27th (9 interceptions) - **2023**: 31st (6 interceptions)   ### **Completion Percentage Allowed** - **2017**: 25th - **2018**: 23rd - **2019**: 7th - **2020**: 14th - **2021**: 10th - **2022**: 16th - **2023**: 30th     You can run the numbers yourself, and average out its about 17th best across all categories. (sounds like ballards .500 MO) If defense wins championships, I guess it makes sense we haven't won the division since he's been here.  Until something changes, this is the reality.    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TLDR: Ballard mismanaged the secondary starting with not extending Rock-ya-sin and our secondary last year was worse than when he took over. We are likely to see similar struggles this season.  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  • Members

    • coltsfan_canada

      coltsfan_canada 1,219

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Gyworks

      Gyworks 13

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Superman

      Superman 21,290

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Happy2BeHere

      Happy2BeHere 2,664

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IinD

      IinD 4,550

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • AKB

      AKB 5,362

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Aaron86

      Aaron86 440

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...