Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Reserve/Future Contract?


The Sack Pack

Recommended Posts

A team can sign a player to a future/reserve contract once the team's season ends. But technically, the team doesn't have roster space until the rosters expand to 90 when the new league year starts, which is usually in early March. So the future/reserve designation means that this player will be on the 90 man roster at the beginning of the league year. Once the rosters expand, the future/reserve designation essentially goes away, and the player is now a member of the 90 man roster. Usually, teams sign their own practice squad players to future/reserve contracts, if they are eligible.

 

Players eligible for future/reserve contracts are those who haven't accrued a full season of service in the NFL, but technically aren't one year veterans yet because they've never made a final roster. Jerrell Freeman last year, who had been on other rosters in preseason, but never on a 53 man roster, qualified for a future/reserve contract. This year, Chandler Harnish qualified, because he was on the practice squad all last season and has no accrued service.

 

I'm sure I'm missing something, but I believe that's the black and white of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A team can sign a player to a future/reserve contract once the team's season ends. But technically, the team doesn't have roster space until the rosters expand to 90 when the new league year starts, which is usually in early March. So the future/reserve designation means that this player will be on the 90 man roster at the beginning of the league year. Once the rosters expand, the future/reserve designation essentially goes away, and the player is now a member of the 90 man roster. Usually, teams sign their own practice squad players to future/reserve contracts, if they are eligible.

 

Players eligible for future/reserve contracts are those who haven't accrued a full season of service in the NFL, but technically aren't one year veterans yet because they've never made a final roster. Jerrell Freeman last year, who had been on other rosters in preseason, but never on a 53 man roster, qualified for a future/reserve contract. This year, Chandler Harnish qualified, because he was on the practice squad all last season and has no accrued service.

 

I'm sure I'm missing something, but I believe that's the black and white of it.

Thats exactly what I was looking for! Thanks a bunch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/rams-tried-to-trade-up-for-brock-bowers-then-byron-murphy   You seem to be right.
    • Read this this morning. Thought it was interesting    https://www.sportingnews.com/us/nfl/indianapolis-colts/news/colts-rams-nfl-draft-trade-offer-revealed-rejected/be019bcd2ee81b6ffeb4656e     "This was the rejected trade offer from the Rams to the Colts in the first round:     Rams get: Nos. 15, 191   Colts get: Nos. 19, 99, 154   While that's the kind of deal Chris Ballard would be expected to take in the past, the Colts clearly had an eye for edge rusher Laiatu Latu.   It's clear that it would have taken much more in the offer for the Colts to move off the chance of selecting the prospect they believe was the best defender in the entire draft.   There were a few viable prospects available at the time so it would have made sense for the Colts to trade back.   But this only proves how convicted they were in draft Latu."     Not too surprised we turnt that down as it has us losing on the draft chart by a little bit, but does show the conviction they had in Latu.
    • Offense wins in the league now and to take it a step further the QB is by far the lost important piece on any team.    So, on offense you need the best possible QB with the best possible supporting cast and on defense you need players who can affect the play of the opposing QBs directly. 
    • This is definitely an issue. So, either Ballard is A.) Cheap and he doesn't want to spend money on FAs (even with injuries happening) or B.) He can't build a competitive enough team to attract any worthwhile FA's after 7 going on 8 years now.    If AR and the current team can't attract FAs that could theoretically get a starting job at the S position for a year, then we are in big trouble according to the opinions of the players of the NFL. Personally, I think Ballard just avoids FA so much that he doesn't want to bring outside help in. He wants to be known as the GM who builds his team from the draft.   Wish the local media would call him out on this.
    • I think the Colts have the money to be competitive for a good free agent safety.  I think bringing in one of them may depend on whether a player like Simmons wants to play for the Colts.  They may be hoping to sign for a team with a better chance of making the playoffs.   So I don’t know if Ballard is making a statement or not?     Hope my answer makes sense to you….    
  • Members

    • C_Lew

      C_Lew 176

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CrazyHorse

      CrazyHorse 6

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Old Colt

      Old Colt 289

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • lincolndefan

      lincolndefan 92

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • richard pallo

      richard pallo 9,139

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Yoshinator

      Yoshinator 9,464

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...