Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Head Games, Bengals use drill from years past that is great for game preparation but can cause concussions, the 'Oklahoma' drill


bayone

Recommended Posts

'Oklahoma' drill used by Bengals is dangerous and archaic

Watch Head butting in Video of this one on one Drill , varying opinions, LT loves that its so physical 

 

The Cincinnati Bengals ran their “Oklahoma” drill Sunday, head coach Marvin Lewis’s traditional kickoff for their first training-camp practice in full pads, and it was once again a hit among spectators and the players looking on. This year, the NFL Network aired it live, and former players gushed nostalgically about its physical and psychological benefits—how it makes one’s body and mind tougher.

 

Chris Nowinski heard about it a day later, and was much, much less excited.

 

“It’s a reasonable drill,’’ he said Monday from Boston, where he is co-founder of Boston University’s Center for the Study of Traumatic Encephalopathy. “Part of the question, though, is how much repetition of it there is.’’

 

They’re a fast track to concussions and, in many cases, degenerative brain diseases like CTE, which Nowinski and his colleagues have found in several deceased athletes who had donated their brains for study.

 

The Oklahoma (one blocker, one tackler, one ball carrier going full-speed in a confined space) is one of many such drills that have been used for generations, at every level of football from the NFL down to Pop Warner—and can, and should, be eliminated, in his opinion

 

http://www.sportingnews.com/nfl/story/2013-07-30/bengals-oklahoma-drill-concussions-chris-nowinski-mike-brown

 

Analysts say this is old school football and this is why bengals win in trenches

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They actually showed this drill in the movie Rudy...years ago...

 

remember Rudy well, but not the drill, pretty good memory for details on your part, guess I just concentrated on premise of movie, all I remember about drills were the team real players yelled at Rudy for trying so hard in practice and he said it was his job so they could be better on the field or something that meant that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

remember Rudy well, but not the drill, pretty good memory for details on your part, guess I just concentrated on premise of movie, all I remember about drills were the team real players yelled at Rudy for trying so hard in practice and he said it was his job so they could be better on the field or something that meant that

 

Its not about a good memory..I've just seen the movie about 40-50 times, so its ingrained in my head..lol

 

In the drill in the movie, there were actually 2 lineman, a back, and the one defender...Look at the clip starting around 2:45...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its not about a good memory..I've just seen the movie about 40-50 times, so its ingrained in my head..lol

 

In the drill in the movie, there were actually 2 lineman, a back, and the one defender...Look at the clip starting around 2:45...

 

 

VERY COOL 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've done plenty of that in the not-too-distant past.

 

The Oklahoma Drill's best asset is that it gets the team hyped up. It's the closest thing you get to being a gladiator in practice, and the one-on-one aspect of it, the bragging rights...it's a high-energy thing. I think Marvin's making the right move opening camp with it because it is a crowd pleaser and opens the season with a bang.

 

That said, I agree with Nowinski that it's all about the repetition. Too many reps of it isn't good because it opens your team up for more injuries, and you lose some of the motivational aspects of it. There's definitely a point of diminishing returns with it. But as a training camp opening-day ritual? It sounds fine to me, although I don't know just how much the Bengals use it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • UDFA: QB - Kedon Slovis, BYU QB - Jason Bean, Kansas K - Spencer Shrader, Notre Dame WR - Xavier White, Texas Tech  RB - Trent Pennix, North Carolina State  OG - Dalton Tucker, Marshall  DT - Isaiah Coe, Oklahoma LB - Craig Young, Kansas   Tryout: DT - Jeblonski Green, South Carolina State  TE - Malcolm Epps, Pittsburgh OT - Jake Hornirook, Duke RB - Justin Strong, Southern Illinois  LS - Michael Vinson, Notre Dame  OC - Jake Kradel, Pittsburgh  OL - Aidan Hemphill, Texas Southern  DB - Brandon Bishop, Liberty  OT - Daniel Johnson, Purdue 
    • Oh no doubt about that. I absolutely value the fact that people like Brugler, Cosell, Jeremiah, etc. actually do the work and take their job seriously. And I also agree that others do very surface level stuff(more akin to what most of us here are doing here as a hoby. Except... they get paid for it).    My angle is not exactly "everyone is the same", they are not. That's why I value extremely highly the work some do and not so much others. And I agree that just because a player doesn't hit, it doesn't mean the evaluation was faulty... or just because a player hits unexpectedly, I don't think the evaluation was necessarily faulty either. It's important to see the reasoning behind the projections and it is important to recognize the uncertainty in any projection really. IMO the uncertainty covers for a lot of shoddy "work" and rankings because a lot of talking heads can just parrot hits and omit misses. So they are not all the same, but their results might be very close to each other. Just like in the NFL - the difference between good and bad GMs in hit rate is in single digit number over the long term. You won't get one GM that hits 80% and another that hits 20%(Although... Grigson probably was close to that one).   Part of it is because the ones that don't do the work, actually copy and plagiarize the work that the great ones do... example, they will take the Jeremiah and Brugler's big boards and will mash them together and just switch a few names around, or if they have a favorite they will bump him up while dropping a specific one they don't like, but in the grand scheme of things the results wouldn't be dramatically different. So the value for me is from the actual verifiable work those people do and the way they present information. WIth people like Brugler or Cosell you can actually tell that it's them that are doing the work. They give you detailed reports on why they think what they think about those prospects. And they are almost never extreme in their opinions - i.e. "this player is trash, he would never succeed in the league". You know they actually sit down and watch those guys play and actually do scouting reports from what they see on tape, rather than from what they've heard someone else say about those players. And with Brugler, even furthermore, you see a ton of background information about those players. He's pretty much doing what scouts for the teams are doing. He's digging about the childhood and adolescence of those players, he's digging up red flags, medical information(whatever is available), etc. And he's just one person. And he's doing it for 400+ players every year. You can only respect that. And I derive a ton of more value out of it than I do out of a random pundit's QB ranking for which I probably have watched more tape than he has. 
    • Agreed   By mid year, this offense might be special,    I wonder if our defense can at least get to 15, in points allowed   Having an offense that grinds it our, will help the defense stay fresh
    • You’re welcome! I agree, some really good information and worth a watch. 
    • Bortolini was very good at the Senior Bowl. Technically sound and quick. I would not be surprised at all if either him or Concalves starts right guard this year, and I like Fries, I'm one of the few on here who doesn't think he sucks. We may be so good running the ball this year Richardson won't have to throw much(20-25 times a game?) This offense is going to be fun to watch and we should win a lot of games as long as we aren't playing cb's 10 yards off the line and dropping linebackers 12 yards deep on 3rd and 3. Go Colts!
  • Members

    • jal8908

      jal8908 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • chad72

      chad72 18,289

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ClaytonC

      ClaytonC 69

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Kirie89

      Kirie89 6

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 19,685

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • tfunky14

      tfunky14 171

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dingus McGirt

      Dingus McGirt 3,598

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • lincolndefan

      lincolndefan 92

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • erock

      erock 3

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Creekside

      Creekside 765

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...