Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Mock based on Draftscout


Recommended Posts

The Colts 24th pick has a trade value of (740) and they trade the pick to the Jets for picks 39,72,141 total value (775.5).  Maybe the Jets want a QB or a TE that they really like and are willing to give the Colts extra to get that player?

 

I don't know if there is a "best" mock site, I just pulled Draftscout, this is based on updates as of 3/17.

 

39) Quinton Patton WR L Tech

72) Jamie Collins OLB S Miss

86) Tyrann Mathieu CB LSU

121) David Quessenberry OT San Jose St

141) Marcus Lattimore RB SC

192) Eric Herman OG Ohio

230) Sam Brenner OG Utah

254) Caleb Sturgis K Florida

 

I think all of these are within 5 spots of where they are projected and in most cases I went down the board rather than up.

 

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

If Chance Warmack was on the board at 15, I would like to see them swap 1st rounders with the Saints and give the up their 2014 2nd round pick to jump up 9 spots.  I think that would get it done if the Colts pick at 24 range again next year.  The Colts would not have picks 39,72,141 in that case.

 

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

If the Colts stay with the picks they have then CB Desmond Trufant seems logical.  Again the Colts would not have picks 39,72,141 in that case.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. TRADE

2. Hopkins WR

3. Bostic LB or Lemonier LB

3. Winters G, Pugh G, Schwenke C/G

4. Swearinger or Thomas FS

5. Geathers or Washington LB (*Conditional?)

6. Bell, Taylor, Barner RB

7. Commings CB

 

Or if 1 of these is available...depends on Irsay's Twitter finger.

 

1a. COOPER, WARMACK, PATTERSON 

1b. Fluker G,  Hankins DT, Lotuleli DT, Austin WR

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks.......

 

Those 3 picks the site has us accepting in a trade are 2/3/5....   which is what I've been predicting the Colts would get if they try to trade down.

 

I think the Colts NOT getting a good compensatory pick is even more reason to trade down....  I don't think we want to be without the 5....  not in this deep of a draft...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Trade him? He just handed him a nice extension.
    • Yes, thanks, you’re right. When the Panthers traded to get the 1 is when Ballard said he didn’t have all the information to make the trade. That’s strange to me.  “Didn’t want to make a blind decision without all the information,” Ballard told reporters Monday. “I know for people, they might not understand that. But I think history kind of tells you that when you do that, you better know what you’re getting. And we weren’t quite ready to do that at that time. And then we feel like there’s enough depth in the draft that we were gonna be okay.”   This was in late March. Ballard had a chance to get the 1 and use it to take Stroud not Young. I think it’s strange he said he didn’t move up to 1 because it would have been a “blind decision.” Why would it be a blind decision in March? Why wouldn’t you know what you’re getting? You’re getting whoever you want if you get the 1. It didn’t happen, but Ballard could have recognized that Stroud was going to be superior, could have made the trade and could have drafted him. Ballard admits it never occurred to him to attempt the trade because it would be a “blind decision.” 
    • I cringed after seeing the way his leg bent underneath him to the point of him sitting down on it. Buckner is one tough dude and to see him needing help to get off the field is when I knew he was going to be out for a while.
    • He probably felt confident Bowers would still be on the board at 15 once he made it past NYJ at 11.  He could've been trading up with other teams to move up to get Brock Bowers, but unfortunately, the Raiders had their eyes set on him and took him at 13.
    • Not now...   Let the year play out. Maybe at the end of the season... 
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...