shakedownstreet Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 Among the many punishments handed down by NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell against the New Orleans Saints were full season suspensions for head coach Sean Payton and defensive captain Jonathan Vilma. Allegedly, Vilma played a leadership role in the Saints' "pay for performance" system.rest of the article...http://sports.yahoo.com/news/jonathan-vilmas-attorney-calls-appeal-hearing-sham-fan-181000737--nfl.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
21isSuperman Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 Mr. Vilma, I award you -1 000 000 respect points. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coltssouth Posted June 19, 2012 Share Posted June 19, 2012 Well that article definately showed writers bias, no doubt who's side he's on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilentHill Posted June 19, 2012 Share Posted June 19, 2012 I mean, I guess thye have a right to be shown evidence in a legal fashion, but the walkout and vow to not return is just childish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Peytonator Posted June 19, 2012 Share Posted June 19, 2012 I hope Goodell lays down the hammer and gives them longer suspensions......for wasting all of our collective time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gavin Posted June 19, 2012 Share Posted June 19, 2012 The writer shows bias of course thats obvious, but there is more to it then whats being said I think, someone is lying no doubt not to mention if in fact Goodell is withholding evidence, isnt that tampering? at the very least its unethical and the truth will come out one way or the other on either end Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldunclemark Posted June 19, 2012 Share Posted June 19, 2012 The writer shows bias of course thats obvious, but there is more to it then whats being said I think, someone is lying no doubt not to mention if in fact Goodell is withholding evidence, isnt that tampering? at the very least its unethical and the truth will come out one way or the other on either endWhen you are guilty...its an attorney's trick to stage an indignant walkout claiming no evidence..Its like a boxer who just got knocked down telling the trainer..he's not hurt...The trainer isnt sure if you are hurt or not and he might beleive you... Vilma is an employee of Goddell'she can accept the punishment or he can quit and sue the NFL...2 choices.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldunclemark Posted June 19, 2012 Share Posted June 19, 2012 When you are guilty...its an attorney's trick to stage an indignant walkout claiming no evidence..Its like a boxer who just got knocked down telling the trainer..he's not hurt...The trainer isnt sure if you are hurt or not and he might beleive you... Vilma is an employee of Goddell'she can accept the punishment or he can quit and sue the NFL...2 choices..Vilma is saying..you cant show me the evidence of the things we both know I did.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now