cdgacoltsfan Posted Friday at 11:03 AM Share Posted Friday at 11:03 AM 12 hours ago, jvan1973 said: Not guilty in the criminal trial bud. He was not found guilty of murder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
csmopar Posted Friday at 12:58 PM Author Share Posted Friday at 12:58 PM 14 hours ago, cdgacoltsfan said: Nope...he was found guilty in the civil trial.....not guilty in criminal skam trial. Lol He was found liable by negligence. Not the same thing as a criminal guilty verdict. That said, OJ was a piece of work that should have gotten convicted and death penalty in the first place. that said, all this happened post career. It is not the fault of any team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
csmopar Posted Friday at 01:07 PM Author Share Posted Friday at 01:07 PM 13 hours ago, Nate! said: Jvan out here looking for the real murderer 1 hour ago, cdgacoltsfan said: Lol ...yep. Hopefully he will solve it soon. well if you actually go and read the evidence that has been made public, and then read the judges notes, you’ll understand how the jury came to that conclusion. The LA PD bungled the handling of the crime scene so bad they should be in jail for it. Having patrol officers keep DNA evidence in their cars and not turn it in? Like seriously? And then the only DNA evidence that survived just happened to be OJs when all other vials were determined to be tainted due to heat? that said, reading the evidence, and using nearly 14 years as an investigator, have an unpopular opinion. i don’t think OJ actually killed anyone with his own hands. i do however, think OJ was present and had hired a hitman to kill them. The two different sized bloody footprints leaving the scene and the small glove is what . I think he hired someone to help him, I think he was present and watched them die at his orders. eitherway, he was responsible but I still feel there’s more here 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nate! Posted Friday at 04:40 PM Share Posted Friday at 04:40 PM 3 hours ago, csmopar said: well if you actually go and read the evidence that has been made public, and then read the judges notes, you’ll understand how the jury came to that conclusion. The LA PD bungled the handling of the crime scene so bad they should be in jail for it. Having patrol officers keep DNA evidence in their cars and not turn it in? Like seriously? And then the only DNA evidence that survived just happened to be OJs when all other vials were determined to be tainted due to heat? that said, reading the evidence, and using nearly 14 years as an investigator, have an unpopular opinion. i don’t think OJ actually killed anyone with his own hands. i do however, think OJ was present and had hired a hitman to kill them. The two different sized bloody footprints leaving the scene and the small glove is what . I think he hired someone to help him, I think he was present and watched them die at his orders. eitherway, he was responsible but I still feel there’s more here Jvan and Csmopar a regular Sherlock and Holmes. Godspeed on finding the real killer(s)! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cdgacoltsfan Posted Friday at 07:13 PM Share Posted Friday at 07:13 PM 6 hours ago, csmopar said: well if you actually go and read the evidence that has been made public, and then read the judges notes, you’ll understand how the jury came to that conclusion. The LA PD bungled the handling of the crime scene so bad they should be in jail for it. Having patrol officers keep DNA evidence in their cars and not turn it in? Like seriously? And then the only DNA evidence that survived just happened to be OJs when all other vials were determined to be tainted due to heat? that said, reading the evidence, and using nearly 14 years as an investigator, have an unpopular opinion. i don’t think OJ actually killed anyone with his own hands. i do however, think OJ was present and had hired a hitman to kill them. The two different sized bloody footprints leaving the scene and the small glove is what . I think he hired someone to help him, I think he was present and watched them die at his orders. eitherway, he was responsible but I still feel there’s more here Well, the bloody glove didn't fit because he was trying to put it on over another glove. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nate! Posted Saturday at 01:21 AM Share Posted Saturday at 01:21 AM 8 hours ago, Nate! said: Jvan and Csmopar a regular Sherlock and Holmes. Godspeed on finding the real killer(s)! well, meant Holmes and Watson but couldn’t edit it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Waylon Posted Saturday at 06:10 AM Share Posted Saturday at 06:10 AM On 7/4/2024 at 4:19 PM, cdgacoltsfan said: It was a ridiculous question. No need to wet your pants over it. Fixed that for you. My pants are dry. Yours may be wet with drool, but that is a you problem. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goatface Killah Posted Saturday at 04:42 PM Share Posted Saturday at 04:42 PM On 7/5/2024 at 9:07 AM, csmopar said: well if you actually go and read the evidence that has been made public, and then read the judges notes, you’ll understand how the jury came to that conclusion. The LA PD bungled the handling of the crime scene so bad they should be in jail for it. Having patrol officers keep DNA evidence in their cars and not turn it in? Like seriously? And then the only DNA evidence that survived just happened to be OJs when all other vials were determined to be tainted due to heat? that said, reading the evidence, and using nearly 14 years as an investigator, have an unpopular opinion. i don’t think OJ actually killed anyone with his own hands. i do however, think OJ was present and had hired a hitman to kill them. The two different sized bloody footprints leaving the scene and the small glove is what . I think he hired someone to help him, I think he was present and watched them die at his orders. eitherway, he was responsible but I still feel there’s more here Why would a hitman use a knife? And why would a person who hired a hitman be there with them when they committed the crime? OJ obviously killed them. There is a mountain of evidence to support that. He also pretty much admitted he killed them in a bizarre book and an interview. Why do people want to overthink these things? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now