Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Head Games, Bengals use drill from years past that is great for game preparation but can cause concussions, the 'Oklahoma' drill


bayone

Recommended Posts

'Oklahoma' drill used by Bengals is dangerous and archaic

Watch Head butting in Video of this one on one Drill , varying opinions, LT loves that its so physical 

 

The Cincinnati Bengals ran their “Oklahoma” drill Sunday, head coach Marvin Lewis’s traditional kickoff for their first training-camp practice in full pads, and it was once again a hit among spectators and the players looking on. This year, the NFL Network aired it live, and former players gushed nostalgically about its physical and psychological benefits—how it makes one’s body and mind tougher.

 

Chris Nowinski heard about it a day later, and was much, much less excited.

 

“It’s a reasonable drill,’’ he said Monday from Boston, where he is co-founder of Boston University’s Center for the Study of Traumatic Encephalopathy. “Part of the question, though, is how much repetition of it there is.’’

 

They’re a fast track to concussions and, in many cases, degenerative brain diseases like CTE, which Nowinski and his colleagues have found in several deceased athletes who had donated their brains for study.

 

The Oklahoma (one blocker, one tackler, one ball carrier going full-speed in a confined space) is one of many such drills that have been used for generations, at every level of football from the NFL down to Pop Warner—and can, and should, be eliminated, in his opinion

 

http://www.sportingnews.com/nfl/story/2013-07-30/bengals-oklahoma-drill-concussions-chris-nowinski-mike-brown

 

Analysts say this is old school football and this is why bengals win in trenches

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They actually showed this drill in the movie Rudy...years ago...

 

remember Rudy well, but not the drill, pretty good memory for details on your part, guess I just concentrated on premise of movie, all I remember about drills were the team real players yelled at Rudy for trying so hard in practice and he said it was his job so they could be better on the field or something that meant that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

remember Rudy well, but not the drill, pretty good memory for details on your part, guess I just concentrated on premise of movie, all I remember about drills were the team real players yelled at Rudy for trying so hard in practice and he said it was his job so they could be better on the field or something that meant that

 

Its not about a good memory..I've just seen the movie about 40-50 times, so its ingrained in my head..lol

 

In the drill in the movie, there were actually 2 lineman, a back, and the one defender...Look at the clip starting around 2:45...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its not about a good memory..I've just seen the movie about 40-50 times, so its ingrained in my head..lol

 

In the drill in the movie, there were actually 2 lineman, a back, and the one defender...Look at the clip starting around 2:45...

 

 

VERY COOL 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've done plenty of that in the not-too-distant past.

 

The Oklahoma Drill's best asset is that it gets the team hyped up. It's the closest thing you get to being a gladiator in practice, and the one-on-one aspect of it, the bragging rights...it's a high-energy thing. I think Marvin's making the right move opening camp with it because it is a crowd pleaser and opens the season with a bang.

 

That said, I agree with Nowinski that it's all about the repetition. Too many reps of it isn't good because it opens your team up for more injuries, and you lose some of the motivational aspects of it. There's definitely a point of diminishing returns with it. But as a training camp opening-day ritual? It sounds fine to me, although I don't know just how much the Bengals use it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Richard….    JVan and I aren’t agreeing on much recently, but on this issue I believe he’s right.   But there’s more….      I believe as the story goes Ballard shared that Morocco Brown and other scouts were confident that Smith could play RT effectively.  Ballard was worried because Smiths arms are very short at 32 1/4 when Ballard wants at least 33 1/2 if not more.  So Brown and the scouts convinced Ballard Smith was athletic enough to do the job.    And they been right.  
    • maybe not a starter but I think dulin will be a pleasant surprise this season
    • All of the following is my opinion…. I think 2024 is the last year for Ryan Kelly and then Bortolini takes over in 25.      I think Smiths last year is 2025, and I think the Colts will draft a RT to replace Smith in 25 and the kid will start for the Colts in 26.      I think Goncalves might take over at RG for Fries, but almost no one realize Fries graded in the top 40 percent of all guards, so there will be good competition at the spot.     I think the Colts are using the next few years to rebuild the Colts offensive line for the near future… 
    • Once again showing your ignorance .  Just like in your Peyton vs Brady arguments.   Russell and his fellow Celtics were clearly the best basketball team of the 50s/60s.   if that’s the case (and try following the logic), that would stand to mean that if they had the same advantages as those 80’s teams had in terms of training, true professional training facilities, etc, then they would have just been just as good as any 80’s team.   It’s the same when young people today say that Magic/Larry, etc, would have no shot against kids who have played AAU and been groomed since 10 years old.  Of course they would have, given the same opportunities.
    • Two players make a championship team?  Two small forwards, in fact? again, you’re showing your basketball ignorance.  
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...