w87r

Sunday Ticket said you can have unlimited streams(meaning all games at once)as long on the same wi-fi. Then up to (2) devices outside of the home? I haven't really tried to connect to YouTube TV on multiple, but (3) seems insane. Figured it was the same as Sunday Ticket though. Unlimited if on same Wi-fi? Have to look more into it. https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2023/05/25/youtube-tv-will-allow-unlimited-simultaneous-streams-for-in-home-sunday-ticket/ Does look like you need to add 4k package for unlimited YouTube TV (regular) Unlimited streams on Sunday Ticket though.

I think MHJr will be just fine. Elite talent, elite lineage. Ohio State will have another QB, it's like an assembly line.

What NCIS you watching? That's what I have been tuning into. Watched a bunch of New Orleans, not to much, but what I noticed this morning was it just populates the episodes per season, which makes it easier to go through and find episodes? Had a bunch more populate overnight that wasn't in there initially after I hit the record.

Idk? I actually like that, tbh. The DVR is unlimited, to my understanding, so space isn't an issue. I will just say, for instance last night, I was watching a show that I have seen a lot of episodes but had a run on ones I hadn't seen yet. I didn't want to stop watching so I just carried on. Then around midnight I went and figured out the DVR, so I could go to bed and catch up later. Worked good for me. It is tough getting used to the setup though, I've been on Hulu($70) for a while now. I liked or was at least used to the site. Just gonna take some getting used to. Something else I need to figure out is how to get it on all my other devices(wife +kids)? I never made a password, can they just sign in, as long it's on the same wi-fi?

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2023/06/11/is-the-leagues-anti-gambling-message-getting-through/ Snippet: Article that made me revisit a thought I had the other day after listening to Coaches media session. Now when Coach Steichen, was continually asked about the gambling thing, he often tried to move on to next question. However, at one point, he did give an answer about how the league came in and talked with the team. Then when asked if it was similar to what went on in Philly with the league coming in, he pretty much said it was. The only problem I had with his answer in that part, is it really didn't shine a light on what the team does/did after the league came into talk to the team. It was almost as if, he wasn't saying they did/do anything, just leave it at that? Idk, just seemed a little weird answer. I know he wasn't trying to talk about the issue, but in my opinion, what he did say left me with more questions about how well the players are informed and then reinforced afterwards. Idk? Just a thought. How do you perceive the situation in these regards Anyone else think coaches answer was a little weird on initial listen? Also the article goes into how communication could be improved. Have to say I agree, could definitely use some improvement.

Yeah, same, as much as I would love to get MHJr, just don't see it line up, unless we were to move on from Pittman.

Same here, still trying to figure out youtube TV myself. Had immediate buyer remorse, thinking I should've just got Sunday Ticket stand alone package. It will be alright I'm sure, once I figure it all out.

I would rather have a good season. That will most likely mean Richardson is progressing into what we all hope he can. That's the most important thing on the team right now.

Injury matters, I don't question his heart though. Werner was definitely a bad one, but mid 20's isn't as bad as number 1. Still had 6.5 sacks in his 3yrs with Colts. I think to qualify for this Hall of Shame category, draft spot is the biggest qualifier, followed by production. Has to of been a first round pick, the higher the more production needed. Quinn Pitcock sticks out in non 1st rounders. Video game addition...smh.

He was the number 1 pick and had 8 sacks for his career, only 5 for the Colts, and that great play. Injuries happen, but still need to be taken into consideration. Hard to put a QB as the worst, because teams miss on them all the time, and you have to take the gamble. Might be a little harsh, but it is for anyone that is listed. Draft spot vs production is main driving force for me. We traded for him, can definitely fit under that category though. I had high expectations as well, I was pumped up when we first made the tradem

It was only a 1yr $3m deal That's a lot of bad trades. Probably throw Marshall Faulk for a 2nd in there as well. Although we brought in Edge, still gave away Faulk. I didn't list a trade, but I agree it would be caving to Elway.

Refs taking over in that little stretch of the 4th. 2 ghost calls on Jokic to get his 5th, those were big calls. Strip by Gordon off Bam leg, shooting foul. Will say Mike Malone needs to quit holding on to his challenges. Doesn't use them when he should and then ends up leaving game with it in his pocket. Outside of that little stretch it's been ok. Like I said Malone needs to use his challenges.

That's my list Although that 90yd INT TD his rookie year was nice. Game clincher vs Marino.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.yardbarker.com/nfl/articles/amp/indianapolis_colts_hall_of_shame_worst_breakup_and_more/s1_13132_38902648 Worst Breakup: Andrew Luck Worst Draft Pick: Jeff George Worst FA signing: Laron Landry Worst Loss: Vikings This was their choices, with explanations in the link. What's your list?

I'm still in the process of figuring out the parameters. I've been checking out a few posters numbers. Had a poster with 18000 post and 2.5 rep points that wasn't in the ROH. I think being active recently, is a big part of it as well.

Go to your account upper right and scroll down to bottom once you click your name. Or just scroll down to the bottom of this page it is listed down there.

I believe 2000-2200 reputation points. Will do some more research. But more goes into it, number of post, really just site activity.

https://coltswire.usatoday.com/lists/indianapolis-colts-otas-takeaways-what-we-learned-week-3/ Media will be present all 3 days next week. Will be interesting to see if Richardson gets any run with the 1's. He might have been on non-media days the last couple weeks? Maybe they had Minshew working with the 1's ok media day, to further hide Richardson? We will see next week, then hopefully after the break, some injured guys will be back and ready to roll. Definitely need these young CB's getting some reps.

No doubt, especially with being presented the opportunity to potentially have 2 top 5 picks next year.(potentially better). Could of always flipped #4 for more assets though.

Just watched the first 7 minutes or so. Nice inside look. Wonder what Ballard offered? If that was Ballard on that call, pretty sure it was. Sounds like an "offer" was made though. Glad we held firm.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.si.com/.amp/nfl/2023/06/09/isaiah-rodgers-nfl-gambling-scandal-new-problem Snippet: That bolded part made me laugh a little. But this article has a lot of good points. It's not about the truth, if Rodger's threw games or not, because I don't think that is there. He played to well last year for that to be the case. It is about the outside perception as a whole, the professional leagues already have a bunch of questions about other things(officiating, PEDs), this just add fuel to the fire, that much more. Saw something written the other day talking about, would the league try and sweep it under the rug if a superstar(we'll just use Mahomes as example) was caught? Doubt they could get away with sweeping it under the rug, but outside people will always wonder.

Hooker(25) is even older than Levis(24). Even at 24, he can still have a 12-15yr career if things go ok. So the age thing in is a little over blown. Unless it is like Chris Weinke or something, who was about to turn 29 when he was drafted. I do like that ours just turned 21 though. I can see why Titans fans wanted Hooker though. Close ties, and pretty much most Titans fans in Tennessee are Volunteer fans as well.

What's your thoughts on Ja's camp pushing a fake gun narrative? Think that helps reduce a suspension? I don't buy the fake gun narrative, but I'm not sure it even really matters. Can't say I blame them for trying to push it, but like I said, not sure it is going to help anything. Who rolls around with a fake gun anyway, just another good way to get you killed. Silver told him he shouldn't be posing with a gun like it's a toy after the first incident. Fake gun would fit with Ja's fake persona though, and just makes him look even worse than he already does And played Center at that

I don't think too many people are ready to pay Pittman that(I know I'm not). That's just the range that has been placed as the potential next contract. WR are encroaching on $30m a season and the league has became more of a passing league. RB's are by committee a lot more as well. It all just comes back to production per cost. Teams feel they can start a RB , drafted in the 4th round and he can come in and have good production for a fraction of the cost. Tennessee thought they could not pay Brown and just draft a guy. That didn't go to well for them. Then you have the Chiefs that did the same thing with Hill, but it did work out. Easy to see why. Mahomes>>>>>>>>Tannehill This is going to be the tough decision the Colts will have to make with Pittman, although he isn't near the level of those 2 guys I just listed.