Narcosys
-
Posts
6,792 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by Narcosys
-
-
Oh please! That would be great. With man coverage in the cb's he could help really well on the run when needed.
Makes me happier than a body builder directing traffic.
-
So that pathetic attempt at a post to insinuate that you had somehow claimed victory in this ridiculous conversation (that I am embarrassed to even be involved in), holds no merit whatsoever, and you are still wrong?
I was simply pointing out a mistake on your behalf, and enlightening you.
"Informed Opinion" is still not an oxymoron... just letting you know.
, embarrassed? You started this thing by asking if i knew the definition iof oxymoron. You really had no reason to chime in on this other than to try and make me look bad, or to try to stroke your ego with a forum argument. that is sad. only be embarrassed of yourself. I know I am for you. I did not insenuate anything. People here are overly sensitive and judgemental anymore. Change your tampon bro. You can let me know whatever you want, it's your opinion, not mine. Again just like Brian, if someone doesn't agree with your opinion, you feel the need to prove yourself even further. Please be done with this cause I know I am. Say whatever you want, I'm no longer responding to you. Good day.
-
Okay, I don't understand the majority of what you are saying but I think I may have deciphered the jist of it.
It seems that if Websters Dictionary have deemed 'informed opinion' to be an oxymoron, then they are indeed wrong, because at no point does the opinion become factual, you use facts and knowledge to support the opinion. Do you understand?
Now if you would be so kind provide me to a link to the Websters Dictionary page were this information resides, or is it a members only club?
Holy Smokes dude, websters was for the definition of opinion and belief. Never said oxymoron. Wth are you talking about. Let me guess, friends with Brian? If not you should be, just as persistent.
-
I would say 2 at minimum. Gives us time to develop what we have a lil more, get sime good drafts, and start attracting bigger names that are willing to come because they want to play for a competing team, not just cause of money.
-
Just so you know, you shouldn't believe everything you read on the internet.
Really? That's what your going with? Flavor Flav WOOOOOOOOOOOOWW!
Websters dictionary bro.
You only got into this to try and prove me wrong and feed your ego. Whoop whoop, your cool.
Either way, guess its another "uninformed opinion" of mine. Anyone else care to pop off about this? I'm here all day lol
-
opinion: a belief or judgment that rests on grounds insufficient to produce complete certainty. 2. a personal view ...An informed opinion is not an oxymoron. An informed opinion is giving your view on a certain topic, having a sufficient knowledge of the area in which you are discussing.
I'll give you an example I used earlier....
- My mother giving her opinion on the rigors of child birth is an informed opinion.
- Me giving my opinion on the rigors of childbirth in an uninformed opinion.
My informed opinion is that we live in a society where people are far too quick to share their uninformed opinion.
Belief: : a state or habit of mind in which trust or confidence is placed in some person or thing
If you are informed then you know factual information. Which is contradictory to the definition of opinion. It is a commonly used term, but so is military intelligence, which is an oxymoron. If you state something that is factual, it is no longer an opinion. Something with which mr. Casserly was trying to do and refusing to listen to any other opinion which contradicted his which he was trying to pass off as fact, or very strongly pushing for.
Seems very close to one to me.
-
This isn't my fight but I just had to ask, do you know what oxymoron means?
Yes, combining contradictory terms. Informed is having facts, opinions are more like assumptions and lacking facts but filling in what you think to be true. If your informed you can provide facts to back up your position. Of which he never provided any only attack personally. Even when I was sincerely interested in his opinion about other positions he could not provide anything other than he had informed opinions.
-
a smiley barf would have better enforced your statement
. whats your beef with himCan't do emoticons on my phone unless this works (
). But he didnt make our team and went to practice squad after getting a concussion, during what preseason where its not nearly as hard. then signed to active for bucs and did nothing there. I'd take a draft pick over him. He had his shot, don't waste a slot giving him another -
i like jabin sambrano
Barf!
-
Wayne.....
Hilton
Brazil ... Palmer, Whalen, Adams?
This is it... right now. Indy has got to have something cooking or WR has got to be Indy's #1 selection in the draft.
Welker 12m for 2 years? I am kinda shocked Indy did not better that. And I am TOTALLY shocked NO OTHER TEAM in the NFL stepped up and paid him. Wallace is worth the "world" and the most productive WR in the NFL since 08 is worth half that at less than half the years?
6m a year for only 2.... I just can't get over that. Patriot fans are on a suicide watch currently... and I can't blame them. This will hurt NE.
Wow.......
Grigs has got to have a plan here....
I read on the NFL app that if the pats didnt resign welker that he was looking to "stick it" to the pats. What better way than to go to manning and only take 2 mil more over 2 years than what the oats offered. Brady was "beyond enraged" about the signing.
-
read all my posts.
Sorry not searching the colts forum database for every post of yours that has no relevance to the discussion at hand.
-
read my other posts
Your only other post pertaining to receivers was blocking Thomas, decker, or stokely. Only now we have to worry about blocking weller over stokely who is way better than stokely. Again, makes perfect sense, Not!
-
Oh, I think we can do better than Vaughn as well. And given that Ladarius Webb was a 3rd rounder, I could easily see us grabbing a guy then to develop. I just think the first in the wrong place to address depth at CB when we hand selected 2 guys, and fell luckily onto someone who needed to establish himself (Butler).
Good call, since we got Toler I completely agree. Had we not, it could be up in the air, but also with all our FA pickups, what do we really need? Safety? WR? RB? All positions seem adequately filled right now to me. Not saying there aren't positions that couldn't use improvement, but we can do well with what we have.
-
Stop asking me questions without addressing your errors.
Yes, I know. I just acknowledged that in my previous post. The difference between yours and mine is that mine is an informed opinion and yours is not.
Dude I'm done discussing this with a belligerent *. Sure you win bro, I'm completely stupid in all this and have not been looking at this with an informed opinion. Which is an oxymoron, now cheer up, calm down, and express your "informed" opinions to someone else.
-
not really because welker cant do anything but play the slot. welker was a nobody before he went the patriots. you expect him to have the same production at 32 with a weak armed qb.
A weak armed qb who is still putting up his normal numbers and a slot receiver who has an excellent short game. Ya a terrible combo IMO, good call. Not!
-
Drafting one in the first <- FIRST round.
I know we'll need depth, and as Casserly correctly pointed out, we still have Vaughn. That leaves 1 spot wide open. I'm ok with Vaughn at #4, I'd think #5 could be later draft selection or UDFA to have Pagano develop. Based on who falls, etc.
Makes sense. I know what first meant but thought you were killing the idea of getting another at all. I think we can do better than Vaughn however.
-
I never said first either, you assumed. See where assuming makes an A out of you not me? And I also never said putting up big money. I merely was stating that the CB was more important than what Mr. Casserly was saying.What in the sam hill are you talking about? I am not advocating using a FIRST round selection on CB. I also would not advocate using our THIRD round selection as I feel that is still too early. Beyond that, we absolutely should have 5 (perhaps 6) corners on our roster.
So, whether they sign a guy today, tomorrow, next month, in the draft, or whenever is purely of no concern. They simply don't need to throw out any big money deal (2 million +/season) for a #4 and #5. I have not contradicted anything I've said. I simply have pointed out that we have a solid group of 3 corners, and we don't have an urgent need for a capable starter at the position. Just depth.
And here's what you said.
"but if you plan on drafting one in the first, bringing in Toler at 15mil/3 seasons seems like a hilariously stupid move."
Maybe I misunderstood.
-
You are. Because inspite of reality regarding our situation specifically at CB and the situation generally with CBs, you rail in support of an opinion that is incorrect.
Because like me, there are many here with "informed" opinions. I enjoy those very much. As it stands right now, yours is not one of them. But, I was there too.
You run with tolerance...I'll stick with the Truth.
What exactly are you thinking shoukd be the positions that should be filled that hasn't already been addressed?
Unless you work in the FO, truth is everything out your mouth is an opinion. Railing, really? I said one thing. I don't consider that railing. I think that was actually my first post on it, and you act like Richard Sherman.
-
Concerning??? Seriously? How far away is the preseason right now?
We have a draft, and FA started yesterday. At this point, I am stoked about our CB group, Toler is an improvement over Powers by most accounts. We have several months to acquire 2 more corners.
Do you think we're going to start he preseason with just the three guys we have now? At this point, the thing to be concerned with is the areas on the team that are heavily without talent. Corner is now the furthest thing from that (due to the signing of Toler). Why be concerned over lack of depth when the players needed for depth we can go about getting in any number of ways. Heck, Vaughn and Butler were afterthoughts when we got them.
.... I don't get it. First you condemn people for saying to draft a CB or for getting another in FA , but then turn around and say that we have those same bad ideas to strengthen our CB corp. so which is it? Get another CB or not because you literally contradicted yourself.
-
Last I checked, Vaughn was our #4/#5 guy. We can find that guy in the 3rd rounds and beyond.
Davis - Most likely our #1 guy.
Toler - Most likely our #2 guy.
Butler - Most likely our Nickel guy.
Beyond the top 3, the remaining #4 and #5 can come from just about anywhere, but if you plan on drafting one in the first, bringing in Toler at 15mil/3 seasons seems like a hilariously stupid move.
Also, Ladrius Webb was developed into a solid #1 corner... he was drafted in the 3rd round.
So, what is the problem? We didn't replace our stop-gap #4 backup corner? Next you're going to tell me that we need a 2 more kickers so we can have Vinatieri's backup and Vinatieri's backup's backup.
When did I say 1st round? But only having currently 3 corners is a little concerning to me.
-
No rocketscience. I don't care what you think.
We already have 3 quality CBs that can play Man like they're supposed to.
I get it, you're another uninformed cornerbackite who hates reality. We've got a handful of y'all here perpetually engaged in rants against the truth; CB is the least important position in both the 3/4 AND 4/3 Defenses. I'm sorry it offends your unread opinion.
I'm not sure what a cornerbackite is, but everything your saying is just as much as mine is. I say a CB for depth because if Toler doesn't pan out, and butler has been burnt covering man on the better WR's (Torrey smith, Anquan Boldin abused him). Then we need another for back up purposes and injury replacement.
Furthermore if you don't care about others opinios why are you even on this forum, seems like it is to just make others believe your opinions are facts and to attack Others, Nice tolerance bro. I
-
doesn't
it doesn't all have to be spent this year.
90% of it does, which means approximately 42 million needs to be spent.
-
So you don't care if we don't have quality cb's that can play man like we're supposed to? So your ignoring an important factor to our defense and picking and choosing what information you want to make your argument? Your argument is then invalid, or in other words, you can't be taken seriously.I don't care.
So we lost Vaughn and are replacing powers for Toler, lose 2 and gain 1. I'm no mathematician, but something's off there.He
was, yesterday.
-
I think about as much chance of that as seeing orange bluebirds.
And here's your orange bluebird.
, embarrassed? You started this thing by asking if i knew the definition iof oxymoron. You really had no reason to chime in on this other than to try and make me look bad, or to try to stroke your ego with a forum argument. that is sad. only be embarrassed of yourself. I know I am for you. I did not insenuate anything. People here are overly sensitive and judgemental anymore. Change your tampon bro. You can let me know whatever you want, it's your opinion, not mine. Again just like Brian, if someone doesn't agree with your opinion, you feel the need to prove yourself even further. Please be done with this cause I know I am. Say whatever you want, I'm no longer responding to you. Good day.
. whats your beef with him
). But he didnt make our team and went to practice squad after getting a concussion, during what preseason where its not nearly as hard. then signed to active for bucs and did nothing there. I'd take a draft pick over him. He had his shot, don't waste a slot giving him another
Laron Landry signed with Colts (confirmed) (merge)
in Colts Football
Posted
It's a European man bag.