Narcosys
-
Posts
6,792 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by Narcosys
-
-
3 minutes ago, chad72 said:
I was asking you about my league - Humphries or Kittle for Flex?
Oh lol. Humphries has the higher ceiling and similar floor. Humphries.
-
1
-
-
7 minutes ago, chad72 said:
I'd play Pettis vs Denver since Chris Harris is lost for the season. Everyone else is average. Roby is average, IMO. It puts me in a pickle because I picked the Broncos' D for the playoffs, now that Chris Harris is gone, I am afraid their secondary's mojo is gone and they will start giving up more points.
If he is available, get Jeff Wilson Jr. of 49ers, a starting RB is definitely worth flexing, IMO, since I heard Breida is not playing.
No Humphries over Kittle is what I meant!!!
I don't have kittle in this league
-
4 minutes ago, chad72 said:
What do you think? Humphries or Kittle?
Humphries over kittle? You mean pettis?
So just run pettis over humphries? Humphries is where winston looks for TDs, 5 in the past 5 games, but he is TD dependent.
Hoping to get samuels and jackson and could play both over mixon and cook, and then flex one of them, pettis, or Boyd.
Guess I'll know more tomorrow morning when they process. See you then lol
-
-
I'll just give the full rundown of my team for this week.
QB: Luck @HOU
RB: Mixon @LAC, Cook @Sea, Ware vs Bal (FLEX), M. Breida vs Den, J. Jackson vs Cin***
WR: M. Evans vs NO, A. Humphries vs NO, T. Boyd @LAC, M. Williams vs Cin, D. Pettis vs Den***
TE: C. Brate vs NO
D/ST: Bills vs NYJ, Rams @Chi, Chiefs vs Bal
***I'm dropping Mack to pick up either D. Pettis vs Den, or C. Sutton @SF. I am also dropping Miami D to pick up J. Jackson vs Bengals (who I dropped to get Ware lol).
Assuming I get Pettis and Jackson, what would you say about the lineup? Start Jackson in Flex, or Pettis? I know it seems dumb to play two WR from the same team, but Boyd might get shut down again like he did against NO when Green was out, so he seems more risky than playing Evans and Humphries.
-
5 minutes ago, chad72 said:
It is a risk but if you feel you can attack the TE friendly match up the Browns bring to the table, I'd go with it.
Here is my line up of skill position players in a 14 team 0.5 PPR league (pick 5):
RBs: Alvin Kamara, Spencer Ware, Justin Jackson, Jordan Howard
WRs: Davante Adams, Tyreek Hill, Adam Humphries
TE: Kittle
1 FLEX postion, no mandatory TE, FLEX can be RB/WR/TE
I will swap Justin Jackson out for Spencer Ware if Melvin Gordon plays miraculously. Thoughts???
Probably a smart start there with Jackson.
NO is, Fantasy PA concerned, the best defense against TE's. Do you think Brate will still get TD's, or is Thomas more likely to get the TD?
-
With greg olsen out, ian thomas is an interesting option. Would thomas @Cle be a better option than Brate vs NO?
-
Why are people saying we are nothing without doyle? The 4 games he was out, ebron killed it. Jags D played excellent, the coach was the problem here. Andrew had some bad throws, but those play calling and 4th down decisions were the worst.
-
3
-
-
Absolute WORST play calling I have ever seen. Two, maybe three, times we've got 1 yard or less and you get cute and try to pass the ball, or put in our SMALLEST back to run it up the middle. How does that make any sense whatsoever? Just run the dang ball on those plays and punch it through with Mack or Wilkins? Let Ebron try to run it?! No, enough with the cute play calls.
The defense is tearing us up and you still want to go for it everything three trips to the endzone in three first half. That's the game right there, just take the mother loving points when you see how tough this game is going to be.
-
7 hours ago, chad72 said:
I'd sit Mixon or Cook down. The reason being that NE gives more to RBs between the tackles and the Vikings' strength is not running between the tackles and when they do it well, it is generally Latavius Murray. Broncos - outside the 2 bad games vs the Jets and Rams where they gave up 200 plus yards on the ground, have been top 5 in the rest of the 9 games in terms of run D and they will shut Mixon down, I am certain, read this:
If I had to choose, I'd choose to sit Cook mainly because Mixon has fewer poaches around the goal line because he is used more between the tackles than Cook is.
D.J.Moore
In terms of fantasy PA, NE is the stingiest when it comes to RBs. Benching cook.
-
1
-
-
58 minutes ago, crazycolt1 said:
An argumentative debate is not healthy.
Making excuses for Hunt is curbing the problems he has.
What do you think is a debate but expressing and discussing differing opinions. I guess you can say this is technically an argument because it is not formal like a debate. Regardless the formal setting its the only difference and debates use arguments, which are merely reasoned positions on a subject. The reasons have been clearly laid out and are not just matter of wild speculation or do not adhere to anything illogical.
You can call it argumentative to say it sounds bad all you want, but I will not subscribe to the line of thinking that a person most go along with the masses or popular opinions just to avoid an argument. Without arguments on positions and differing opinions and interpretations of situations, then you live in a tyranny. Sorry but that's not how this works, that's not how any of this works.
-
3 hours ago, crazycolt1 said:
That's right. You have done your best to derail the thread by being argumentative with the original thread.
Having a healthy debate is hardly argumentative. You clearly haven't followed the thread. I didn't reply until page 3, the remarks were already rolling by then. Thanks for playing though.
-
15 minutes ago, crazycolt1 said:
As far as what happened in the video you are the one who is introducing irrelevant information.
We haven't been discussing what happened in the video. Sorry you haven't been following correctly.
-
5 minutes ago, NFLfan said:
You read it the way you wanted to. Go back and read my posts and go back and read your posts. Look at who is being antagonistic.
Btw, I added that animals fight to show that it is behavior that is not controlled by what your gender is. Someone intimated that his daughter should not act as a man. I asked if he was referring to fighting. It is not only men that fight and it is not only humans that fight. That's my point. If you don't get that, okay. Let's agree to disagree.
You see it as antagonistic, is this because you feel threatened by someone disagreeing with you? Because there is no antagonizing, simply disagreeing with your argument. Animals are in no way equal to humans because they do not have the part of the brain that allows them to reason, think critically, and make decisions like we do, that is why humans are separated from animals scientifically.
The discussion is about men and women, and men are more aggressiveness generally speaking. That is why men fight more than women. Its not even a stigma, its a fact.
-
15 minutes ago, NFLfan said:
No.
(Bolded) You're projecting.
I'm not the one introducing irrelevant information to a debate. You can think what you want, but fact is it shows weakness in your position if you have to resort to strawman arguments and bring in irrelevant information to attempt to distract and derail the true discussion.
-
1 minute ago, BOTT said:
Men and women act differently.....yes.
That's awesome, simple yet awesome.
-
5 minutes ago, BOTT said:
Obviously. Men are are bigger/stronger and more violent.
That's sexist and misogynistic, congratulations you're part of the problem.
I'm being sarcastic as men are typically stronger and more aggressive and therefore should be more mindful of physical interactions with women and act accordingly. I'm merely pointing out the hypocrisy of society that says we don't treat women equally, yet want to give them special privileges and protections.
It's all or nothing and presents a problem for those who hold to both beliefs.
-
1
-
-
33 minutes ago, NFLfan said:
Lol. Human beings fight. Not just men. Animals fight too.
Men are more prone to being aggressive, there it's no argument here. It's called testosterone and influences the way mens chemical reactions occur in the body and mind, influencing emotions and aggressiveness. I'm not saying women don't fight, but there is literally no ground for anyone to stand on and say that men are not inherently more aggressiveness and prone to fighting than women are.
And leave the silly comments like animals fighting, it is irrelevant to the discussion and just acts as a strawman and distraction to the real discussion here which is about men and women. It just makes you look worse.
-
15 minutes ago, NFLfan said:
Lol. That is a weird statement. How does a man act? Are you saying that fighting is something that men do?
He's saying if you want to be treated like a woman and hold on to that special privileged right of being put on a pedestal and protected, then don't get in someone's face and instigate a situation beyond what it already is. Don't go attacking and expect to not be retaliated against.
Also, your last question is a bit naive and deliberately playing dumb. Yes fighting is something men do, I mean there have been literally thousands of years in recorded history of it being a sport. And that's not including all the wars and fighting since the dawn of human civilization. To say that men are not instinctively aggressive is to deny natural psychology and physiology if men.
-
42 minutes ago, ColtsGermany said:
I'm shocked about how many guys in here would beat women and defend Hunt.... I mean, what's wrong with you? Even IF she slapped him first.... A SLAP... Wow... Its not like she hit him with a baseball bat and it was health threatening. He could have gone back in his room and call the police.... But no.... That dumb *** pushes her against the wall and kicks her as she is defenseless. I don't know how anybody can defend this behavior. If i would write what i think about you guys that defend Hunt, i would be banned on this forum.
Ever had your eye scratched cause someone was swiping at you?
Slap or not, it doesn't matter, the intent to do harm is there. Period. Nobody is condoning his actions and saying he is entirely right. The self defense is in reference to what transpired before. The biggest debate here is calling out people who act like he put her in a coma, when the reality is far from it. Ya he pushed her over, but it's not like it was a Janikowski 60 yard attempt. Knee jerk reactions of shoving, stupid ya but not a ray rice knockout combo.
Get a grip and realize there are varying degrees of a situation and act accordingly.
-
21 minutes ago, crazycolt1 said:
She was not wielding a weapon in the video. She was outside his room. He came out after her.
I was talking about what happened prior to that. As I stated before, once the situation is mitigated, the self defense line gets blurry. He might have been running his mouth, but she was still being aggressive.
-
21 minutes ago, crazycolt1 said:
Police report? Those cops could have let it slide just because of who Hunt is? You are so quick yourself to have an assuming attitude.
I doubt the cops in another state are going to be lenient on an assault on an unarmed woman unless the investigation proves she was at fault. If they wanted to keep it quite they wouldn't have written a police report at all.
Instead of working in the shadows of conspiracy theory, let's work with the known. What if she was an assassin sent by cleveland?!
There is no assuming. A man can defend himself against a woman as equally as against a man.
-
1
-
-
6 hours ago, jskinnz said:
What a load of absolute bovine excrement.
Does Hunt seem in imminent danger to you?
Unless a woman has a weapon in some sort of life threatening situation, it is NEVER OK to strike a woman.
So you believe women need special protections given to them by men?
-
7 hours ago, Hoo-Hoo-Hoo-Hoosiers said:
Self-defense against a 110pound woman? You are picking the wrong side to defend my friend.
When she's wielding a deadly weapon essentially, gender and size goes out the window.
Need Fantasy Football advice for 2018? Ask here!
in Fantasy Football & Gaming
Posted
Didn't swing pettis or Samuel, so as it stands
QB: Luck @Hou
RB: Mixon @LAC (Flex), Cook @Sea, J. Jackson vs Cin, M. Breida vs Den, S. Ware vs Bal, M. Mack @Hou
WR: M. Evans vs NO, A. Humphries vs NO, T. Boyd @LAC, M. Williams vs Cin, C. Sutton @SF
TE: C. Brate vs NO (Available: M. Andrews @Bal, D. Arnold @TB)
D/ST: Bills vs NYJ, Rams @Chi, Chiefs vs Bal