Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Jason_

Senior Member
  • Posts

    12,815
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    13

Everything posted by Jason_

  1. You just had to point that out didn't you? I skimmed right past that at first, and I was a happier person back then
  2. what is this draft you speak of? I was given the impression by others here that the Colts play their first game next week and we're not even remotely prepared for that!
  3. This has been a blast for all of us. No way would this conversation be better suited for PM. Much better to keep it going here in the free agency thread. Much better for everyone all around.
  4. Were we relying on young, late round draft picks because that's what Ballard wanted to go into the season with? Or was it due to the multiple injuries that occurred to the guys who would have otherwise been the starters?
  5. There are 2 types of answers in this type of situation. Short term answers and long term answers. No, Diggs wouldn't be a long term answer but he could definitely be a short term answer.
  6. Really? How did re-signing Stewart, Moore, Pittman, Franklin, etc make the holes on this team bigger and bigger? Sadly, winning literally is all that matters to a lot of people. yeah you definitely misinterpreted it. I don't think any player ever has preferred to play on the tag rather than a long-term contract. The only way I could see Sneed refusing to a contract is if it's with a team he doesn't want to play for. But I would have to think if that were the problem in regards to the Colts, it would have been known long before now. Yay Chicken Little is back
  7. Well see now you're going outside the parameters set by the OP.
  8. How do you not have a link to a tweet with the answer to that question?
  9. I think we're pretty set at K and P also.
  10. Well, I don't know who else I speak for here, but I think I'll wait until you find and share that report so I can see where it came from before deciding whether or not to give it any consideration.
  11. What's to be confused about? in one sentence, you say they'll take BPA at pick 15, but in the very next sentence you say it won't be Bowers because TE is not the #1 need. Since when does taking BPA mean you're taking a player at the position that's your #1 need? That is a contradiction.
  12. agreed. 2 things that are lacking from the report card are context and tone. To use the daycare as an example, that conversation could have gone multiple ways. ex 1. interviewer: what are some areas of the Colts organization that could be improved? player: oh wow how long do you have. Let's see, first, most teams offer daycare on gamedays. Colts brass want me out on the field but don't care about my family and their needs?!!!! ex 2. interviewer: what are some areas of the Colts organization that could be improved? player: you know, honestly I love playing here. I love the atmosphere, the facilities etc. interviewer: ok but if you HAD to mention something, what would it be? player: well I do know that most other teams offer daycare on game days. that would be nice to have. Just reading the report doesn't tell us how serious nor to what level these complaints are.
  13. These 2 statements contradict each other
  14. you would hope, but it would be one of the only food service establishments to have improved over the past several years rather than regress lol
  15. I'm thinking there's more than a decent chance that some things might have changed in the past 16 years.
  16. I prefer my food not come from Michelin. That's just me though.
  17. The zone heavy defense came about before Gus got here. It seems to be a philosophical thing on Ballard's part, which is one of my least favorite of Ballard's traits. So even if Gus goes, I'd expect someone with a similar defensive scheme/philosophy to take his place.
  18. Standard Operating Procedure I'm afraid
×
×
  • Create New...