Jason_

The reason I disagree with that is I felt that Ballard should have an opportunity to hire the coach (and draft the QB) he actually wanted, not just the coach that was the best of the leftovers after McD bailed. So I was fully onboard with keeping him and resetting the clock with a new HC/QB combo.

the draft is still over a month away. THIS is why people dump on you. Not because you share information. Because you flip flop from one extreme to the other with the changing of the wind and act like the sky is falling when we're barely 7 days into the 2024 NFL league year. Keep going back before Ballard and I bet you'll find similar results. ^THIS I'm grateful for what Minshew was able to pull off last year, but even at his age I think Flacco would give us a better chance to win than Minshew did. As long as Flacco can still throw the deep ball, that alone makes a huge difference for the offense.

Hmm, is Gardner Minshew going to be our QB this year or no?

probably not...still the typical overreaction and wishy washy nature we see from day to day

that has nothing to do with my post. I simply suggested waiting until that actually happens before getting ill over it.

maybe wait until it happens before getting ill over it

And in this day and age, I wouldn't blame him one bit. BTW, we got AR. We did not draft Levis. Let it go.

No it's not

Nah, jokes actually have a purpose

You just had to point that out didn't you? I skimmed right past that at first, and I was a happier person back then

I mean, so can Richardson, right?

what is this draft you speak of? I was given the impression by others here that the Colts play their first game next week and we're not even remotely prepared for that!

This has been a blast for all of us. No way would this conversation be better suited for PM. Much better to keep it going here in the free agency thread. Much better for everyone all around.

Dude....never, ever say that again!

i know, right? oh the irony lol

Were we relying on young, late round draft picks because that's what Ballard wanted to go into the season with? Or was it due to the multiple injuries that occurred to the guys who would have otherwise been the starters?

There are 2 types of answers in this type of situation. Short term answers and long term answers. No, Diggs wouldn't be a long term answer but he could definitely be a short term answer.

Really? How did re-signing Stewart, Moore, Pittman, Franklin, etc make the holes on this team bigger and bigger? Sadly, winning literally is all that matters to a lot of people. yeah you definitely misinterpreted it. I don't think any player ever has preferred to play on the tag rather than a long-term contract. The only way I could see Sneed refusing to a contract is if it's with a team he doesn't want to play for. But I would have to think if that were the problem in regards to the Colts, it would have been known long before now. Yay Chicken Little is back

Well see now you're going outside the parameters set by the OP.

How do you not have a link to a tweet with the answer to that question?

Dear God man.

I think we're pretty set at K and P also.

Which is going to be very subjective

Well, I don't know who else I speak for here, but I think I'll wait until you find and share that report so I can see where it came from before deciding whether or not to give it any consideration.

What's to be confused about? in one sentence, you say they'll take BPA at pick 15, but in the very next sentence you say it won't be Bowers because TE is not the #1 need. Since when does taking BPA mean you're taking a player at the position that's your #1 need? That is a contradiction.