Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Mr. Irrelevant

Senior Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2,096

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Mr. Irrelevant

  1. Mr. Irrelevant
    Oh boy, I’m starting to get the angst by thinking what if we do in fact pick Levis. A week ago I would be fine with Levis, now I’m a bit stressed out.
  2. Mr. Irrelevant
    Ballard, is that you? Welcome to the forum!
  3. Mr. Irrelevant
    Yeah, I don’t know about Levis either. I think he has a bit of a reckless gunslinger in him, maybe it can be tamed, but I get why some people fear that he will be Wentz mark II for us… I want Texans to take him, lol…
  4. Mr. Irrelevant
    I would prefer Young I think Colts are looking at Levis as the most realistic QB at pick 4 and will pick him, if possible. But with Young gone, I’m slowly but surely getting on the Richardson train. With the competition QBs in the AFC, you either go big on ambition / potential, or you go home. Levis will probably be fine, but not something that screams SB to me…
  5. Mr. Irrelevant
    A trade for Foles?! We would have to give a pick away to unload him to another team…
  6. Mr. Irrelevant
    Yeah, our day two picks might also do the trick. Question is how much of a gambler Ballard will be…
  7. Mr. Irrelevant
    I think the plan is to trade down in the first round if Hooker is the target. Somewhere around pick 18-20 if they can find a trade partner maybe?
  8. Mr. Irrelevant
    That is an art form in itself to accomplish!
  9. Mr. Irrelevant
    Me waiting on Ballard to sign some OL help:
  10. Mr. Irrelevant
    Makes sense. Money is better spend on OL, CB or WR help anyway…
  11. Mr. Irrelevant
    Huh? I’m talking about Colts not being in win now mode. I personally think Lamar should stay with Ravens, but that is another discussion. They have a good enough team to support Lamar, IMO.
  12. Mr. Irrelevant
    Hmmm, but isn’t Lamar wasted on a team that is not in full win now mode? We miss way too many pieces for this to make any sense IMHO. You want to plug him into a loaded team that just lacks a proper QB…
  13. Mr. Irrelevant
    Yeah, 3 million is close to nothing.
  14. Mr. Irrelevant
    I think we will only see big spending in FA on OL to help protect the rookie QB. If we see big spending at all…
  15. Mr. Irrelevant
    This is not happening. It was always Irsay that pushed the win now, not Ballard. Ballard have always been long term to a fault.
  16. Mr. Irrelevant
    Make it happen, chad!
  17. Mr. Irrelevant
    Some OL help and a decent CB wouldn’t be bad. And one WR too, of course.
  18. Mr. Irrelevant
    Late 5th rounder is disappointing…
  19. Mr. Irrelevant
    We’re going to draft a QB who can’t finish in the end zone, confirmed! Seriously, I like this signing. It will for sure help a rookie QB if the kicker will get some points on the board when we can’t get the touch down. Less stress. while it looks a bit expensive, I don’t know how much more expensive it is compared to what we have paid the last couple of years?
  20. Mr. Irrelevant
    Ballard at the of FA:
  21. Mr. Irrelevant
    That is a proper managed team, I agree.
  22. Mr. Irrelevant
    Meanwhile at the Colts FO:
  23. Mr. Irrelevant
    31 teams in the NFL:
  24. Mr. Irrelevant
    Not convinced at all but if he comes cheap, sure why not try? But he won’t come cheap enough IMHO.
  25. Mr. Irrelevant
    So, he is not good enough for the Bears but good enough for the Colts? Mediocrity is now the ambition?
×
×
  • Create New...