I agree, Holder sounded like he was advocating for Taylor. Rather than asking an unbiased question, I also thought it was peculiar that he was almost negotiating a live interview with Ballard about Taylor. It was definitely odd.
The way I heard it is, we aren't just gonna let Taylor leave because that isn't the best thing for the Colts, and the only way it will happen is if the compensation is fair.
I don't think that is crazy or unfair to Taylor. He is a top 3 back in this league behind probably only Henry and CMC, so with that being said, we should have slightly less compensation than what the 9ers got, or what a 24 year old Henry would have gotten (or close to it)
When we let Gilmore walk for a low-round pick people were about to protest downtown. Imagine if we let a generational running back, and the best back we've seen as a Colt in a very long time walk out for a 4th rounder and some average player.
No thanks, he signed his contract, so he should play. And if not, we will see what tools we have available, not gonna sit here in a national interview and say something could turn into a lie.
Holder and the media in general for Indy is not very good. But that's a discussion for another time
WE WON FOUR GAMES LAST YEAR