Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Lawrence Owen

Senior Member
  • Posts

    1,916
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by Lawrence Owen

  1. I don't understand what the issue would be to offer him good back-up QB $.  Let him make his own mind. I am pretty sure he sees what is going on here, and would probably like to be a part of it.  

    I read somewhere that he is really active in meeting also, giving insight, and suggestions.  He might be willing to continue this role, and be a security blanket on the side for a fair wage.

  2. 2 hours ago, NewColtsFan said:

     

    That is what you wrote?

     

    No, you didn’t.

     

    You wrote that we owe thanks to Josh McDaniels for hiring ME as if JM knew who Eberflus was and wanted him.   That’s not true.   The truth is totally different.   The thanks for ME belongs to Chris Ballard, not Josh McDaniels. 

     

    As for Frank Reich...   I give credit to him for being smart enough not to reject those coaches the Colts had already hired.   If Frank had insisted on hiring “his own guys” it likely would have led to not getting the head coaching job he long wanted.   This was his best shot at a HC job and he grabbed it.   I was glad when we hired FR and I’m even happier today.   Reich’s been a great Ballard hire.  But I don’t think he had much choice in those three hires.   Reich played it smart.   Props to him.

     

    Here is my source.

     

    https://patriotswire.usatoday.com/2018/02/22/hired-by-josh-mcdaniels-colts-dc-matt-eberflus-has-no-hard-feelings-for-almost-head-coach/

    "After speaking to and essentially getting hired by McDaniels, the former Cowboys assistant left Dallas for the defensive coordinator role in Indianapolis.  

    Then Eberflus was spurned along with the rest of the Colts franchise when the McDaniels made a last-minute decision to remain in Foxborough. There was no bitterness, Eberflus told Peter King of MMQB.com on Wednesday."

     

    https://cowboyswire.usatoday.com/2018/01/16/dallas-cowboys-matt-eberflus-facebook-wife-indianapolis-colts-josh-mcdaniels-rod-marinelli/

     

    "Social media reports can hardly be taken as gospel, however this particular source is going to be hard to refute. First reported a month ago by 105.3 The Fan’s Mike Fisher, Matt Eberflus has been in line to be named defensive coordinator whenever and wherever Josh McDaniels landed as a head coach."

     

    When i do research, I go beyond just the Colts circle.  I go into other teams articles as well.  It just seems more thorough.

     

  3. 3 hours ago, throwing BBZ said:

    A nice piece for anyone that hasn't followed the season.

    A person could have followed the entire season and not been able to pick up on some things and put them together.  That week 7 was what physicist's dealing in time/space would call a "Fixed moment in time".  So many things converged at that point of the season, and the perfect time, to flip the script of the defense.  Had they not had the meeting, had the schedule right after been the toughest stretch,  Had they waited for the meeting until after week 9.  It was as I said, fortuitous.

  4. 26 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

    Seriously?

     

    Week 16 and YOU STILL DONT KNOW  THE STORY OF HOW WE HIRED MATT EBERFLUS?   Really?

     

    If I had one dollar for every time I’ve written this story I’d retire to Hawaii right now.

     

    Again.......   

     

    The person who found Matt Eberflus was Chris Ballard.   They met at some NFL event several years ago and CB was hugely impressed.   They became good friends.   Ballard said when he became a GM he wanted to hire ME as his DC.

     

    Josh McDaniel couldn’t pick Matt Eberflus out of a police lineup!   Hello!

    When Ballard hired JM he told him about the type of defense he wanted and that he wanted to hire ME to run it.  McDaniels didn’t care as much about that side of the ball and said great.   As the head coach JM made the call to hire ME.   But it was not because he knew him and wanted him...   it’s because Ballard (his new boss) knew him and wanted him.   So McDaniels  made the call.   A formality. 

     

    Is this really the first time you’ve read this story?    Really?

     

    That's a formality as you said. The fact that Josh hired him, and the other two, left the next day.  Then when Reich was hired, he decided to keep all three and work with them IMO is the real story. No fuss, no muss.  He walked in and decided he'd work with who Josh already hired, (all three) and fill in the staff around what was already there.  He could have made a stinker about wanting 'his 'guys', but did not.  He did research on them, after already knowing of them from his time the NFL, and decided to keep them that is IMO the biggest decision of import here.  So that is what I wrote.

  5. 4 hours ago, CR91 said:

    Games with the pats or steelers always scare me for the obvious reasons, but trap games scare me the most and we've already fell victim to one (still can't believe we lost to Cody flipping Kessler :sigh:) This game in no means guarantees us anything, but a loss basically ends any chance we have left.  We need to bury the giants quickly. We need to do what we've done the last two games, contain the run and force the QB to beat us. Eli is not like Watson and Prescott however. He is not going to move around. He is going to sit in the pocket so the key is to collapse it. We need to get to Eli early and often. As for offense, Giants run defense is ranked one of the worst, so I  expect to see a lot of Mack in this game as well as hines working on their lackluster LB corp

    Ogletree might be out, if he is that is great news. a very opportunistic linebacker. OBJ still has yet to practice this week. But Sheppard is a quality receiver as well. It all really does hinge on stopping Barkley.  Eli is a slinger though. DB's will need to be watching him, because he'll throw into the tightest off spaces hoping his WR wins the match-up. Could be some easy INT's there if our front 7 keeps constant pressure on him.

    I didn't to a breakdown of this game, because the votes on twitter told me to do the defensive write-up.

    FYI, i don't see this as a trap game.  Trap games imply a game a team overlook's.  They won't overlook because it is imperative they win out these last two games. 

    Elliot Harrison said it best:

    "This could get gnarly awfully fast. ---- If Odell Beckham Jr. is absent again, Big Blue will be in 0-17 trouble again."

  6. 25 minutes ago, coltsfanej said:

    Well written. I don't post a whole lot on the forum but I do come here daily to read some insights of fellow Colts fans. And I have found that some here can write and analyze football as good or better than many analysts that do it for a living. 

    Appreciate your words.  It is a goal of mine to write about the Colts for a living. But being a small media market, and I don't have a lot of material to produce right now for a resume', it is more of a dream.

  7. 3 hours ago, richard pallo said:

    Nick Siaranni just said that he saw a lot of talent in Marlon Mack.  He said he reminded him a little bit of Jamaal Charles.  Nice comp. for sure.  But so far in year two he is no Jamaal Charles. One game does not make him a star RB. 

    Where do you get 1 game? He has played extremely well in 5 games this year.  And against (at the time) 3 top 5 run defenses.  (Jets, Bills, Cowboys)

  8. 9 hours ago, aaron11 said:

    the simplest way for me to put this is id like to see us higher than 20th in team rushing.  mack isnt getting us there, someone like bell or another more consistent back could do that 

    Then you are blaming the wrong person. That is Reich calling more passing plays than running plays.

    This makes no sense to think that having Bell will MAKE Reich call more running plays. He calls plays due to what the opposing defense is showing, and the current feel of the game.  Not because of who is carrying the rock. 

    When called upon, Mack has delivered.  There is no evidence anywhere that suggests Bell would carry the ball any better than Mack. The only argument you had was you thought Mack did not have the Durability to have more than 15 carries a game.  The cowboys 27 carries proved that wrong.  And as a matter of fact, When Mack has at-least 15 carries a game, the Colts are 5-0 this year.

  9. 1 hour ago, braveheartcolt said:

    Lawrence, I don't drive and I certainly don't have a truck, so I am puzzled at your response. Oh, and I never said we would win a play-off game, I inferred that if our fans want to see more respect from the media, that is what they need to do......

     

    I am very pleased with progress this year, no matter how it ends. If the 'conceded' tie v the Texans stops us getting in, that will be my only real disappointment. 

    I'm sorry, if you're not American you may not know the idiom.  It means hold on, you are getting ahead of yourself.

    • Like 1
  10. 2 hours ago, braveheartcolt said:

    Kyle Brandt on GMFB is all over the Colts. Plenty respect if you look around. NFL Gameday are also generous in their praise. We need to cut out the 'poor little old us'.....and scoring 0 vs Jax quite righty made some analysts skeptical.

     

    Win at least one play off game this season and we will get the respect some of you are expecting.

    You might want to back your truck up just a little.

    I like your enthusiasm, but we're not in the playoff's yet.  It is quite possible we win out, go 10-6, and still not get in.  I'm not betting the Steelers beat N.O. AND the Ravens beat the chargers, but it is possible.

    Now, I still think If we win out we should have a ton of respect even if we don't make the playoffs...10-6 is a heck of a lot better than 4-12.  And I would still Be pleased with the Colts, where they are and where they are heading if they even went 9-7.  We are already past where 90% of the odd's makers said we'd be before the season started.  And I've seen plenty to be very pleased and optimistic about the very near future of this team. 

  11. 1 minute ago, richard pallo said:

    He can see the Jets cap space too.  Also the Browns.  He just wants to get paid what he's worth.  Once he's a FA the market will dictate his worth and he will pick his team.  Who knows maybe the Jets offer him 17m and we offer him 16m and he chooses us.  Maybe we pay him 15m but with more guaranteed money than anyone else.  It's not black and white you know.  Everyone loves Ballard so let him work it out if he thinks Bell is the playmaker we need.  He said himself any FA signing has to be a win for the player and the team.   Trying to say that signing him is going to hurt our chances of building a SB team for years to come is just silly.  I don't buy that reasoning at all.  I think Ballard knows how to plan for the future.  

    Oh, i'm a Ballard truster.  I just not sold he'll sign Bell for that kind of $$.  Not with what he's preached.  I think if Ballard brings him in, see's his character and works him out. (still need to do that after such a big drop in YPC his last year) and likes what he sees, He may give him a proposal. Whether Bell likes it or not, or if Ballard & Bell can come to an agreement on $$ remains to be seen.

    I am just saying that I like Mack as our main RB.  I think he's done pretty good considering.  8th in the NFL in yards /game, and 6th in YPC for RB's over 150 carries is good production.

  12. 52 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

    We are actually getting alot of respect today from the media in general but it took a game like this to get everyone's attention. Alot of the talk is still what Dallas didn't do instead of what we did. 

    yeah, i've noticed that also.  Not a lot of credit. It's like they are saying the Cowboys came to Indiana and took a 3 hour nap.

  13. 1 minute ago, richard pallo said:

    10-12 mil?   He turned down more than that from the Steelers.   

    Exactly my point.  I'd not spend 17+mil on any RB.  Some people seem to think because of the interest he's shown in coming to the Colts, he settle for a lot less.  I don't think so myself, I just think he see's our cap space and thinks he can cash in.

    If he'd sign for 10-12 mil, then it would show he actually wants to be here, and  not hurt the Colts build a team that has a chance to be super bowl contenders for years to come.  (I just don't think he would).

    • Like 1
  14. 3 minutes ago, BOTT said:

    The colts face a lot of 8 man boxes because they play more 2&3 tight end formations than anyone in the league.....so it's not really a "stacked box" Mack is facing.

    Those are short yardage formations though. Not really meant to break big gains.  So still to average that with those formation is impressive.

    If we had a 2nd stud WR, we'd be able to spread the defense out more..have less big bodies on the defense and Mack would have more open space to run.  Still say a big time WR is a better way to go.

  15. 1 minute ago, aaron11 said:

    bell could be that target, the free agent WR market never has anyone special 

     

    im not even worried about cap space when we have 120 million that has to be spent soon.  there is plenty to bring in bell or anyone else 

     

     

    After all the resigning (and holding some back for next year's resigning on 3rd year players) ,there will be enough for maybe 3 big free agent signings.  I just don't know if Ballard will even go big.  I hope he can grab a couple with lower $$ than they want,..but it would be a good buy if he can.  I', in on Bell if he can get him in the 10-12 mil range...but not more than that.

×
×
  • Create New...