Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

FalseStart

Senior Member
  • Posts

    1,524
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by FalseStart

  1. 1 hour ago, Shive said:

    Getting Roquan would help me feel a lot better about taking Jefferson, because Jefferson's biggest issues revolve around effort and motivation. Roquan is a really strong leader who, I believe, would help keep Jefferson on the right track mentally.

    Mike and Will would be set for years to come...any concern about Roquan not getting off NFL blocks...take Hurst, Hand, Green DT in the 2nd or 3rd...slide in a CB like Alexander, Oliver or Hill... Defense beginning to look formidable.

  2. I'm not so sure they are set on drafting a QB at #1 or #4 with their recent history not only drafting bad QBs but with their record.  I think guys that will help them win now are more important than a QB 1-2 years away... 0-32 or 1-31 over the last 2 years... I think ownership wants to see progress...7-9 or 8-8 would be like winning the Super Bowl for this franchise.  An experienced QB for this team is the more appropriate option...than looking for that first winning lottery ticket in a top 5 QB.  50% fail... Ray/Colin make a good point about QBs...

     

     

  3. Except for the Price pick (Should go Top CB, ILB or Guice RB if he fell to 36).  Not sure why everyone is looking at Price as anything but Mewhort 2.0...could get a similar G at 49.  Nice mock though. Like the Hurst pick...Would really like a Hurst and Rashad Green duo at 37 and 49...OT in 3rd is perfect.

     

    Cheers...

    • Like 1
  4. 32 minutes ago, Kyle said:

     

     

    no one is saying "Just draft an ILB at 6" ......  If we feel TE is our franchise ILB to lead our D for the foreseeable future then he would be a great pick at 6 (obviously better at 12 if he was there because we gained extra picks trading down.....duh).  If we do not feel he is that guy, then he would be a bad pick at 6 or 12.  

     

      

    Not sure why folks respond to others opinions on these forums with hypothetical statements that lead to no where.  

  5. 3 hours ago, Kyle said:

    I dont understand how people can say things like this.  Edmunds has the potential to be one of the very best ILB in the NFL.  How can he be an ok pick at 12 but not 6?  You either think he is the guy we want, or you don't.

     

    What part of it is making it difficult for you to understand?  His value IMO...is not one that would warrant a top 10 selection...just as a round three guy may not warrant a first round selection...or a kicker in the 1st-5th rounds...etc. 

     

    I am assuming you have understood the bigger picture of us drafting at 12 rather than at 6  (Additional picks at #x,y,z)

    I would prefer Smith at 12...if Edmunds was drafted at 12 I would be happy...because either with the additional draft picks would be a more valued and glorious pick.  Just draft an ILB at 6...no.

×
×
  • Create New...