Archangel
-
Posts
407 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by Archangel
-
-
IMOP
LT cast
LG Mewhort
C Kelly
RG Goode
RT Haeg
I was high on Haeg when he was drafted i was just worried about his weight but when he replaced Reitz he did hold his own, But lets see what happens next week
-
IMOP the colts got away with a couple of flags but I do agree when all the key pieces to the defense comes back they will be very solid. Anderson was on a snap count but was disruptive enough and he was in the back field a lot, I thought Green and Geathers was very good a little rusty but very effective, And Davis even not at 100 percent showed a difference. Colts get Jones Butler and Robinson back in a couple of weeks.
-
20 hours ago, RockThatBlue said:
Quoted wrong post.
Sorry wrong post is this about hurry up offense that is exactly what I was just saying
-
IMOP they should try it in the first quarter maybe it would help get them in a rythem and out of the slow start, They are playing to much from the starting script they are handed during the first quarter
-
Does anyone who went to training camp know how Haeg performed. he played LT in college from what i saw during preseason he was alright, Out of all the rookies left on the roster haeg is the only one that is able to step in if needed
-
1 minute ago, BOTT said:
I think that was the game plan....run the clock, limited possessions, keep it close and hopefully pull it out in the end.
Yes i do understand the running of the clock but I also understand first downs moves the chains. that is what will keep the clock moving. I just do not see him looking at the defense and taking what they give him running the ball for 2 yards when you can pass for 5 yards buy changing a play seems to keep things moving.
-
30 minutes ago, a06cc said:
The only thing Andrew did today that was his fault was that pick 6. That was on him. We have to get healthy period though.
the pick 6 i think was not his the rogers was open, Talib made a good break on the ball
-
29 minutes ago, threeflight said:
I have said this for over a year.
Is he a very good QB?
Yes.
Should he be the highest paid player in the NFL?
Not even close.
He has a lot of faults. In fact I think fundamental wise, he was a much better QB his last year at Stanford then he is now. He has regressed and I pin much of that on the OL and coaching.
Let me ask this can he read a defense because i have notice he does not do much in audablizing at the line
-
well here is the question is the play calling or is it luck not reading the defense and audableizing out of a play he was given. I have seen during the game many of times were he would run the ball when denver had 8 or 9 guys in the box, this has me baffled.
-
will not comment until the colts are up to full strength afterwards then will see how they do
-
3 minutes ago, AustinnKaine said:
Can you please at least attempt to form a proper sentence. I wanted to read it, but my brain was just like...
No.
So let me put this in prospective for you to read. Both tackles for the colts are not very good it was shown today as it was shown last week. It does no matter how good ware and miller are they should be able to hold their own. The management payed Constanzo a lot of money to protect luck and so far this season he has performed below average, If ware was not injured in the 3rd quarter the LT would of been in the backfield more then the RB due to being pushed backed As for reitz I believe he is a backup and should sit and stay as a backup. Move Good back to RT, and put in Haeg and or Clark at RG as a option. Do you understand this
-
I for one have seen enough with both tackles from the colts they were both abused if ware was not hurt the LT would of been in the backfield more then the RB it is time for the coaches to look at better options lets look at Haeg or Clark or move good back to RT and put clark or haeg at RG .
-
31 minutes ago, NorthernBlue said:
Kinda intense to demand a player better be injured because of bad performance
Was not stating and or wishing for any player to be or even getting hurt during a game so before you put to much into comment. The statement was he had to been hurt to began with because he was a complete no show for the game he had no pressures and no tackles and correct me if iam wrong his name was called only once.
-
Correct it goes hand in hand if we cannot get pressure it is all mute at this point need the front four to get some sort of pressure which probably will not happen until anderson anf arthur comes back
-
14 minutes ago, husker61 said:
players dont sign one year contracts that are free agents, except when franchised. he signed a 3 year deal.
my bust your right well they are in a world of hurt unless they get this young LBs to catch up quickly.
-
Believe the should of kept Freeman for one more year until they found their ILB
-
If the colts get ahead early colts win 24- 21 colts have a slow start colts loose 27-21. This defense needs to find a identity this game
-
Sorry IMOP I like Ferguson he missed a couple of assignments last week but over all he did a very good job if all the teams the colts face this year are going to load the box I would put Ferguson in the backfield he can catch the ball out of the back field and do some damage in the open, Frank can also come in and confuse the defense who will think this could be a run play. I believe the colts should use the RB a little more out on swing passes like they did against detroit this might help open the run game
-
10 hours ago, GoColts8818 said:
He was wearing a boot after the game. He said on his radio show he would be good to go Sunday.
HE had better of been hurt because he sure was a no show during the lions game.
-
how about look for a LB
-
1 minute ago, Restored said:
Why does the Colts scoring seem to be such a given? I realize Luck and co. were playing well but there is absolutely no guarantee that they score. If you have the chance to score and have a play that you feel will get it done for you, you call it and then rely on your defense if it works out. In a perfect world, the Colts score with little to no time for Detroit to do anything but that's not reality. The defense is the reason why the Colts lost, not Pagano's timeout.
i am not saying scoring was a given if you read what i said this was was 4 down territory anyway, I was more concerned with putting a beat up defense back on the field who could not stop a runny nose with 34 seconds remaining and 3 TO. The Clock was the Colts best friend yesterday if they would of managed it right and forced detroit to use a couple of TO things of been different. Thats all iam saying
-
27 minutes ago, Restored said:
The entire point of that drive way to score. If the Colts had an opportunity to score but passed on it to say maybe do a running play or a dump off pass to milk more clock, would it have really mattered?
I do not think it was about scoring or not scoring it was about managing the clock, the colts had plenty of time to score. You me and everyone on this forum knew the colts defense was not going to stop the Detroit lions due to the nature of how the defense was playing at the time or even how they were playing all day. It was up to colts coaches to minimize the chances of the lions to drive 40 yards and kick a FG, To me the TO was not the problem it was allowing the lions to have 3 TO and 34 seconds left to do it in. The Colts was depending on the defense to make a stop, but did not allow ST to help by not trying to kick the ball into the next county on the kick off or by not calling its last TO to try and ice the kicker so that tells me you have no confidence in your ST to try and stop them at the 10 or the 15 but you are allowing the defense to try and stop them with 3 TO and a whole field to play with. Iam not on here to disagree with anyone but their is a time to use the TO and the time to let the clock run. No matter how you look at it this was 4 down territory for the colts the last 1.10 of the game. and I sure in heck did not want detroit to have the ball back.
-
Well at this point and time I would sure like to find someone out their who can play LB and sign them
-
1 minute ago, Restored said:
Again, I'm bringing this up because it was the reasoning Pagano used. If you want to believe that Detroit having one less timeout would've made the Colts defenders able to tackle on the last drive, by all means go ahead and fight that argument.
In reality in 1.10 no one knows how many TO the lions would of used, If chuck does not call his TO and forced the lions to call a TO or if luck used his time correctly and forced the lions into another TO who really knows the point is football is a game of chess and you force the opponent to make a mistake and the lions forced the into a mistake and it cost the colts the game
Changes you would like to see
in Colts Football
Posted
I dont think Blythe is ready yet, They will insert only in a emergency like today but if correct he is the backup center and guard