Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

ReMeDy

Senior Member
  • Posts

    4,839
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by ReMeDy

  1. 1 hour ago, John Waylon said:

     

    It’s not that he didn’t accept something he didn’t want. That’s not how accepting something works. He changed his mind. 

     

    We shouldn’t need rules to encourage us to keep our word. 

     

    The worst part from what I read is Josh McDaniels was the one who was seeking out a head coaching position in the first place! The Colts did not reach out to him to BECOME a head coach; they reached out to him because he put the request in himself!

     

    And, of course, Josh did not one, but TWO sitdown interviews that by all indications suggested he was on-board with the Colts.

     

    Ironically, he settled for being an OC, so basically he just wasted everyone's time and used the Colts as leverage to increase his position with NE.

  2. 3 hours ago, Mel Kiper's Hair said:

    I love Peyton Manning and Andrew Luck but my favorite Indianapolis Colt of all time is without a doubt Pat McAfee. Gotta love "Boomstick"!

     

    giphy.gif

     

    You're going to like him even more now that he will have a stint at the WWE! He will be a monster!

  3. 15 minutes ago, Cynjin said:

    I saw that Belichick was at Georgia's pro day.  What Georgia player is he trying to keep the Colts from getting?

     

    That was just a ruse. He's calling up teams telling them all the QB's suck. He says to go heavy on o-line/d-line picks, but to make an exception for Barkley because he looks bad in blue. I can only assume one thing: Belichick thinks Barkley is going to be a cop.

  4. 7 minutes ago, neug3246 said:

    Blunt and Mack now that would be a good combo

     

    Yea, he's basically a better Frank Gore at this point, and 3 years younger. Instant upgrade, and he did come from the Eagles, so he should find some common ground with Frank Reich.

     

    Only problem is we can't be guaranteed Barkley in the draft, so I think signing him would close the door on Barkley, but maybe open the door for Chubb.

  5. 1 hour ago, gregr507 said:

    So Schefter just tweeted this, making it sound a little less certain than the couple tweets in the OP. The lions are at least in consideration anyway

     

     

     

    OMG, Blount is on the market again!? I swear if the Pats resign him, I'm throwing up. How much more does that guy have to prove before teams realize he deserves guaranteed top money?

  6. 17 minutes ago, Mel Kiper's Hair said:

    I tend to believe that the browns are going to take Barkley with the 1st pick and still get the top QB at 4. Just my opinion but it would make it easier for whoever they take at 4 because they won't have the pressure of being the 1st overall pick in the draft. It will give the Browns more leeway to develop the QB and not have to immediately throw him to the wolves.

     

    If I were the Colts, I'd be tempted to call up the Browns and say, "If you take our guy, Barkley, at #1, then we're going to trade down to a team who wants a QB and you're going to lose out on your guy when you pick at #4." Sure, it's a threat, but it's a dog eat dog world on Draft Day.

     

    Of course it's possible the Giants pick Barkley so... uhh,  I hope Ballard's binder has nude Eli photos.

  7. I don't buy it at all. This is a ruse. The other teams are probably grilling the Browns over the phone, saying, "We all know you won't take a QB at #1 when you're sitting on a #4, and this crop of QB's isn't that good anyways, so we'd rather just trade with the Colts or Giants and save 1st overall money."

    This hurts the value of the #1 pick, so now the Browns are just like, "You know what, fine, screw it. You all had your chance. Now we're taking a QB at #1." The Browns don't really mean it though. You know it's bad when the presumed #1 QB on the board is getting Johnny Manziel comparisons.

  8. 1 hour ago, JimJaime said:

    He was very strong in the one area the Pats front 7 were awful.. against the run. Foles didn’t beat the Pats Ajay and Blunt did.. 

     

    I don't know about that. What about that catch Foles made? Or the gutsy 4th down call for that TD? Or that 4th down call late in the game that would have lost them the game had they not completed the pass?

     

    I'm just saying Foles played a huge role in also beating the Pats. It's not like he was just handing it off to the RB's all game long.

  9. 1 hour ago, gregr507 said:

    Lol OP I love the thread title. I think most people here probably didn't get the reference, so let's go inside the mind of a Greg Jennings...

     

    ***the language in this video is VERY nsfw! don't watch if you don't want to hear vulgar language

     

     

    Jarvis Landry must learn to run with two broken legs if he hopes to win with the Browns.

×
×
  • Create New...