Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Cynjin

Senior Member
  • Posts

    6,013
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Cynjin

  1. 25 minutes ago, Lennon1940 said:

     

    Holy crap. Dude.  Some of your "No's" are ridiculous.

     

    Russell Wilson - 13,141 total yards, 133 TD's, 191.8 QBR, (set the ALL-TIME national record for QBR, only passed by Mayfield recently)

    Keenum - 20,114 total yards, 178 TD's, 160.6 QBR (the current ALL-TIME national leader for passing yards and touchdowns)

    Dak Prescott - 11,897 total yards, 114 TD's, 151.0 QBR (third in SEC history for total yards)

    Garoppolo - 13,156 yards, 118 TD's, 168.3 QBR (National FCS Quarterback of the Year)

    Carr - 13,033 yards, 118 TD's, 156.3 QBR

    Darnold - 7,561 yards, 64 TD's in just two seasons, 153.7 QBR

    Trubisky - 4,056 yards, 35 TD's his only season as a starter, 157.6 QBR

    Dalton - 11,925 yards, 93 TD's, 166.5 QBR

     

    Now let's look at what a non-great, but average, QB looks like in college

    Brissett - 6,625 total yards, 58 TD's, 131.3 QBR

    Best season: 3,135 total yards, 26 TD's, 136.7 QBR

     

    The only thing that is ridiculous is some of your takes.

     

    Wilson was good for one season, after he transferred to a better program, that does not make him a great college Qb. 

     

    Keenum was not great in college, I don't care how many yards he put up in that gimmick offense at Houston.

     

    You obviously did not watch Dak in college, he was not great.

     

    Garoppolo was good in FCS, that's all.

     

    Carr was at Fresno State, not a good conference, that's why I said maybe.

     

    Darnold again was not great during his two seasons, spout all the yards you want, but he was not great.

     

    Trubisky, one season does not make a great college QB.

     

    Dalton, see Keenum.

  2. 7 minutes ago, Lennon1940 said:

     

    Good grief if I’ve said it once I’ve said it a million times in this thread: most  great college QB’s are never starting QB’s in the NFL, but virtually all starting QB’s in the NFL were great college QB’s.

     

    So all of those guys you’ve listed have absolutely nothing to do with the topic we’re discussing.

     

    NFL  Starting QB                                         Great College QB?

     

    Ryan Fitzpatrick                                                 No

    Josh Allen                                                             No

    Sam Darnold                                                       No

    Jimmy Garoppolo                                              No

    Andy Dalton                                                       No

    Case Keenum                                                     No

    Kyler Murray                                                     Yes

    Lamar Jackson                                                  Yes

    Jameis Winston                                                 Yes

    Marcus Mariota                                                Yes

    Joe Flacco                                                            No

    Nick Foles                                                           No

    Mitch Trubisky                                                 No

    Derek Carr                                                         Maybe

    Eli Manning                                                       Yes

    Matthew Stafford                                             Yes

    Cam Newton                                                      Yes

    Carson Wentz                                                    Yes, but in FCS

    Baker Mayfield                                                  Yes

    Deshaun Watson                                               Yes

    Kirk Cousins                                                       No

    Dak Prescott                                                       No

    Jacoby Brissett                                                   No

    Ben Roethlisberger                                           Yes, in the MAC

    Russell Wilson                                                   No

    Jared Goff                                                           Yes

    Patrick Mahomes                                              Maybe

    Philip Rivers                                                      Yes

    Aaron Rodgers                                                  Maybe

    Matt Ryan                                                           Yes

    Tom Brady                                                          No

    Drew Brees                                                         Yes

     

     I believe you need to re-evaluate your definition of virtually all.  It's closer to 50/50.

  3. 29 minutes ago, DougDew said:

    Having stepped away for a week or so and looking at this more objectively.

     

    If Luck scammed the Colts:

     

    first by lying about the condition of his shoulder during the summer of 2017, so he could miss a season instead of play in it.

     

    Then lie about needing more rehab, as an excuse to be away from the Colts and instead travel throughout Europe.

     

    Then play in 2018 to justify his previous lies.

     

    Then make up a phony leg injury to further drag on the phoniness he started in late 2017.

     

    Then throughout the 2 year scam, struggle to speak about it without stammering and getting nervous in front of cameras because it was tough to keep his nonsense story straight.

     

    Things wouldn't look a whole lot different than they do.

     

    So this is your idea of looking at this more objectively......, interesting.

  4. 9 minutes ago, Indyfan4life said:

    Some of the comments here are flat out void of any intelligence. People are mad we signed someone that has learned (just like JB) under Brady, Hoodie and McDaniels and was more than serviceable when called upon. We only have to keep him for one season anyway if we want to. 

     

    Unfortunately, you could say the bolded for most of the threads here.

    • Like 2
  5. 1 hour ago, Smonroe said:

    Totally agree with you on Ballard.  But a very good LT in this league is a rare commodity.  

     

    The Texans figure they’ll be drafting too high to get a sure thing, so they rolled the dice.  You can’t blame them for selling out to protect their franchise QB.  If Grigson would have done something similar...

     

    They had a really good LT in Brown.  Wouldn't it have been better to have paid Brown and not needed to send all that draft capital to the Dolphins?

    • Like 3
  6. 14 minutes ago, Turftoe said:

    Does Kelly have a history of troubling behavior or just the issue from last year?  I have only followed him since his arrival here and don't know.

     

    Manziel was acting up in college, before his first training camp, and beyond.  I certainly agree that Kelly needs to prove his trustworthiness but a single incident does not necessarily define a person of poor character.

     

    The way I see it Brissett is the de facto #1 QB and the starting job is his. He will/should remain the starter as long as he plays to the satifaction of the coaches.  If he fails to deliver, you bench him and go with the best option available.  If Kelly hasn't had any behavior issues, and he's the best QB option you play him.

     

     

    Chad Kelly definitely has a history of repeated behavior issues.  He has a lot of talent, but he has been a knucklehead.  So far Kelly seems to be toeing the line and staying out of trouble.  If he continues to show that he has matured, then he could become a good NFL Qb.

    • Like 1
  7. 19 minutes ago, Superman said:

     

    I did some rough math with incomplete information, which is perfect for posting on a message board...

     

    The NFL gets at least $6B/year in TV revenue, split between 32 teams is about $187m/year, per team. Over a 17 week regular season, that's about $11m each week. Based on the Packers financials, they make about $7m in revenue per home game. 

     

    Take away one preseason game at $7m (which is probably high; I get the feeling teams don't usually sell out in preseason, which means parking, concessions and memorabilia also take a hit), but add two weeks to the regular season, and each team comes out ahead.

     

    And my proposal is you go to a 19 week regular season, with three bye weeks. So that extra revenue is only coming from being on TV for two extra weeks, not from tickets, concessions, etc. That also means you're not taking on additional overhead; you're actually reducing your overhead, because you're getting rid of a fully staffed preseason event, and not adding any regular season events. I think my proposal is a net gain for each team, solely on the basis of dominating TV for two extra weeks in the regular season.

     

    I also think my proposal is better for the players and the quality of the game. If each team has three byes, you can schedule TNF only after a bye week -- which takes care of the low quality TNF games and probably improves ratings, increasing future profitability. 

     

    The bolded is both funny and accurate.

     

    So you are saying get rid of all pre-season games, correct?  Which is also fine by me, the teams may need to have rosters expanded a little.

  8. 3 hours ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

    I may be old fashioned but I think the NFL should keep everything the way it is except only play 2 pre-season games should be played. Only 6 teams making the playoffs is perfect IMO, it makes the regular season super important. 

     

    I understand the sentiment, but I can't see that happening.  The owners are not going to give up the kind of revenue they get with 2 pre-season games.  If they cut the pre-season down to 2 games, which would be fine by me, they are going to want to make up that revenue somewhere.

  9. 3 minutes ago, csmopar said:

    Uh oh... but but but he hates the colts and is a bronco...

     

    howd we go from day 11 yesterday to day 13 today? 

     

    Also, anymore word on Big Q?! He’s the one guy on that OL we really can’t lose

     

    Funny, I just got on to read the training camp thread and the first thing I wondered was, what happened to TC day 12?

    • Like 1
  10. 2 hours ago, SteelCityColt said:

     

    Bull, soft tissue issues can linger and niggle for a long long time. Maybe they’re being massively over cautious here and pulling him at the first sign of any discomfort. 

     

    Without actual access to the clinical notes we’re all just guessing. The fact he’s not scheduled to have follow ups is encouraging. 

     

    There you go again, using the n-word.   Which I believe can be used to aptly describe this thread.

  11. 2 hours ago, Valpo2004 said:

    http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000001036801/article/stunner-packers-parting-ways-with-mike-daniels

     

    Not sure if he fits into our scheme but good player who probably has 2 or 3 years left in him.  Article makes it sound like this was a cap move so they could extend some of their younger players.

     

    Thoughts?  

     

    Surprised by the move, cost savings I assume.  He is a good player, IMO, and would add some size to the DLine.

×
×
  • Create New...