GoDeep
-
Posts
1,377 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by GoDeep
-
-
It is pretty close to a push, home field usually gets 3 points.
I say Colts win this one.
Sanchez is a pster hiod for NOT playing a QB his first season..
And Sanchez is MOST DEFINITELY a pster hiod!
-
-
Unreal!
-
Nope, it just looked like one of my tee shots
Heck, my tee shots just end up on the red tees.
-
The TD run was my favorite! This kid is TOUGH!
-
Going to the Luke with my shiny new Luck jersey!!!
-
In my power rankings I have the Colts ranked as the only team on the list.
Nobody else made the list. Weird.
So they are last?
-
My Power Poll:
1. Browns
2. Colts
3-31. Most everyone else
32. Patriots
Discuss.
-
He must be on pace for it, you know, since he has one in each game.
-
I am not a fan of "taking away samples" to analyze stats.
But, I am a fan of blaming the offensive line. Luck looks good with nowhere to go but up. Our line is improving (we will see after the shake up!), but I was scared for our new QB after the line's showing in Chicago.
-
I went to bed at half, so I didn't see Weeden mount a comeback attempt.
But from what I saw in the first half, this guy is bad. Like worse than Blaine Gabbert bad!
-
MVP is a stretch.
He WAS NOT GOOD HERE.
He is much improved in Chicago. Does that mean we misused him, perhaps?
-
I wanna see freeman an angerer in middle an I'd freeney is not ready move Conner to outside What u think
I would not want to see our most talented defender on the bench.
-
Soooo, Luck is good, right?
I look forward to the updates!
-
-
It would take Davis nearly as much time as it does for folks on here to get healed.
The Packers aren't the same team from last year... If they struggle tonight then we'll know for sure but I expect the colts to stay in the game with them.
And if freeney is back? I see a good bit of pressure on rogers
Pack do not play until Sunday.
-
Yikes!!! No thank you. I am ardently opposed to the "industry" that has sprung up from such a benign and ultimately silly pursuit. I view it as a perverted opportunity for over-commercialism and gambling.
I know I know. I'll say it for you....."Jeeez ruksak, you sure are a wet blanket hippie *"......... lol
I honestly cannot even properly explain why it is that FF irks me to such an extent. But thank you for asking.
-
We will need him!
Doesn't it always seem like the Colts are the ones that other teams "get it together for"?
The Pack offense has been struggling - I look for 500 yards and 7 TDs from Rodgers that game.
-
I agree that's an issue I just disagree with the idea polian didn't leave much talent on the defense he did just not at the DT spot.
And it wasn't for lack of trying - well for 4-3 suited DTs.
That position under Polian was maligned with car wrecks, video game addiction retirements, injury, marijuana use, you name it.
-
Yes, You are right! That tragic season is hard to forget about...
What season?
-
And as such, I am equally impressed that our completely torn-down, rebuilding club, coming off a 2-14 season and completely losing our identity, has already equaled half of our total wins from last year.
1-2 ain't bad, especially when consider how competitive we were (losing because of a busted coverage inside of 1 minute) and the W/L records of teams like GB, NE and NO.
We are right where we need to be.
I am impressed with our performace as well. I guess it was too early for me.
Ruksak...since you are taking an interest in individual stats...perhaps I could interest you in some...fantasy football!
;)
-
Wayne's stats are impressive, but I am more impressed by win loss records.
Oh well, it's early in the morning, maybe I am cynical this AM.
-
Doesn't include the eye test, I guess.
Against Jags it was better, but before they couldn't even make a, stay with me, pocket for the QB.
-
Beating "the scrub jags".
This is unacceptable for a number 1 overall pick
in Colts Football
Posted
This cat is a ROOKIE. We are saying stuff is unacceptable after 4 games - after we beat the Pack to go 2-2 and are darn near 3-1?
That is why I shamed this thread earlier.