Kyle
-
Posts
2,050 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by Kyle
-
-
We should convert Swoope to a WR
-
1
-
-
On 9/26/2018 at 10:02 PM, shastamasta said:
Do us a favor...next time...actually follow through.
touche
-
5 hours ago, Coffeedrinker said:
I have been avoiding this thread. I figured with a title like that it would include at least a couple, probably a few people who have no understanding of football or how to play the game and then try to claim by not doing it their way the Colts were not playing to win but playing to not lose.
But I finally broke down and read this thread. I don't know if I should say I WAS NOT disappointed or I WAS disappointed. I was NOT disappointed in that the thread was exactly was I thought it would be. I was disappointed in that there are still people, who claim to be football fans, yet have no understanding at all of situational football. I mean my word, one poster actually made the statement that the coverage doesn't matter,
Come on, what kind of *ic statement is that?
I don't know which is worse, the comments in this thread or the Bell thread. I read through both and wanted to bash my keyboard against the computer screen.
-
On 7/9/2018 at 5:34 PM, Str8himalaya said:
I’m a madden fan for the most part and it’s been disappointing the past 5-7 years at least. I am curious how TJ Green is rated the same as Malik Hooker though. I think TJ is better than many seem to but I wouldn’t say they are close in terms of talent.
— Matthias Farley: 80 overall
— Clayton Geathers: 78 overall
— T.J. Green: 78 overall
— Malik Hooker: 78 overall
that's all sorts of stupid.
-
submit a 3rd for Beal and 5th for Alexander. let's get both
-
Harold Landry
Josh Jackson
Darrius Guice
-
1
-
-
On 4/25/2018 at 12:07 PM, lollygagger8 said:
I don't think that McGlinchey lasts that long unfortunately
I agree. I was being hopeful that he slips to the 2nd but being the top T in the draft.... you are probably right
Maybe we could get McGlinchey at 22 and take Guice at 2(4)
-
1
-
-
Colts trade the 6th pick to Buf for their 2 1st round picks and a 2nd.
Colts select Tremaine Edmunds 12th overall.
Remaining Colts picks: 1(22), 2(4), 2(5), 2(17), 2(24)
1(22) Guice RB
2(4) McGlinchey OT
2(5) Wynn OG
2(17) Oliver CB
2(24) Sutton WR
3(3) St Brown WR
-
2
-
-
16 hours ago, Four2itus said:
Honesty don;t know what that means...
I was over 30 years old when the internet was started....does that make me PC?
your post reminded me of a player or coach giving the "politically correct" answer.
-
2
-
-
7 hours ago, Four2itus said:
i want hard working, healthy, driven players of good character. Then...coach em up right.
-
1
-
-
30 minutes ago, TKnight24 said:
#6 for:
8th overall
Jordan Howard
2nd rounder this year
Pick next year in the 1-3 rounds
I’m not sure how the trade vaule stuff works so probably could get more. But that’s the minimum of what I’d want back
ok, trade back 2 spots, add jordan howard and a early 2nd round pick.... count me in
-
8 hours ago, TKnight24 said:
Bears can send Jordan Howard, a 2nd & a pick next year and I’m here for it
You would be all for the Colts trading the #6 overall pick for Jordan Howard and a 2nd round pick? i would cry if we did that.... like.... actually cry
-
His last 2 seasons are similar to Randy Moss's 2 seasons in Oakland before going to the Patriots.
Bilicheck saw this opportunity coming and traded away Cooks to free up cap space. I would bet a lot of money he ends up a patriot for 3 years.
-
I was never impressed by him. He is an average DB. Nothing special. He is not a #1 CB.
-
Maybe the pats think they can pick or trade up a few picks and get WR Ridley to replace Cooks
-
2 minutes ago, Jaric said:
Considering we seem to have gotten the better of the last two trades we made with them, we should probably run out of the casino before it's too late.
I would like to think you are right.... but Jacoby hopefully won't play another regular season meaningful snap for us, and Dorsett may be a significant part of the Pats offense next year
-
23 minutes ago, mad dog curtis said:
you can add the new england pats with some other teams looking to tade with the colts.
so... the Patriots trade away a WR for a late 1st round pick and some how that means they are trying to move up to 6?
-
3
-
-
On 4/3/2018 at 12:09 AM, tvturner said:
Even better for us if it goes, QB, Barkley, QB, Chubb, Nelson
22 hours ago, Luck 4 president said:My hunch is the Giants are taking a QB. They are going to need a new QB within 2 years so might as well take him while you’re in the perfect draft position to do so. Then he can sit for a year.
21 hours ago, iuswingman said:Maybe Giants will take a QB and then Bills will trade for #4 and take a QB so that the first 4 picks are all QBs
21 hours ago, Boiler_Colt said:If the rumors about Cleveland liking Josh Allen are true, then I think QB's go 1, 2, 3 with NYG taking Darnold. I think then the Jets would take Rosen but if they take Mayfield, Denver loves Rosen and would take him at 5 if he's there and nobody trades up with the Browns at 4 which the Browns sound unlikely to do at this point. That means 4 QB's in the top 5 and either Barkley or Chubb is available at #6.
If the Browns take Darnold, I think Buffalo works out a deal with NYG.
20 hours ago, chad72 said:I still believe, Baker Mayfield, if available at No.5, would be John Elway's selection, IMO. We will see how it turns out.
I don't remember another draft in recent years being this up in the air. Maybe it is just because the Colts are picking early so I am paying more attention to the top 10.... but it sure seems like the top 10 could go A LOT of different ways. April 26th is going to be a fun day
-
1 hour ago, FalseStart said:
Not sure why folks respond to others opinions on these forums with hypothetical statements that lead to no where.
Sorry... I thought a made it simple enough for you to follow and understand but I guess not
-
17 hours ago, FalseStart said:
What part of it is making it difficult for you to understand? His value IMO...is not one that would warrant a top 10 selection...just as a round three guy may not warrant a first round selection...or a kicker in the 1st-5th rounds...etc.
I am assuming you have understood the bigger picture of us drafting at 12 rather than at 6 (Additional picks at #x,y,z)
I would prefer Smith at 12...if Edmunds was drafted at 12 I would be happy...because either with the additional draft picks would be a more valued and glorious pick. Just draft an ILB at 6
no one is saying "Just draft an ILB at 6" ...... If we feel TE is our franchise ILB to lead our D for the foreseeable future then he would be a great pick at 6 (obviously better at 12 if he was there because we gained extra picks trading down.....duh). If we do not feel he is that guy, then he would be a bad pick at 6 or 12.
-
8 hours ago, NewColtsFan said:
I think it's a waste to even ask for that.
Because I think one or both of the Giants at 2 or the Browns at 4 would take that offer, allowing Buffalo to leap way over the Colts to most any QB they'd want.
We have to ask enough to make it worth while for the Colts ---- but not so much that that the offer is too expensive and Buffalo shops that to a higher team in the draft order.
It gets a little tricky....
I just think for the Colts to move down from 6 it will take a way over the top offer. we shall see!!! cant wait!!
-
18 hours ago, Defjamz26 said:
You trade down to 12 and you’re missing out on a premium player. And that’s what Ballard is looking for.
I agree. For the Colts to trade down to 12, Buffalo would have to offer us WAY more than moving up 6 spots usually would cost.
The Colts would be giving up a sure thing elite player and be taking more of a gamble at 12, and the Bills would be moving up to get their franchise QB. For the Colts to even start considering moving down, Buf would have to offer something like both their 1st rounders, both their 2nd rounders, and next years 1st. maybe even more
I like the idea of a Nelson, Chubb, Barkley BUT 2 1st round, 5 2nd round, and 2 1st next year sounds intriguing
-
On 3/28/2018 at 10:09 AM, Indy Fan said:
I’d personally want their 12, 2018 2nd, and 2019 1st. Gamble they are bad next year. Could always bundle a 2nd with the 12 to try and get Edmunds/Smith at 10.
not enough. If the Bills want our 6th pick, they are going to need to offer their 2 1st round picks, 2 2nd round picks, and next years 1st
-
2 hours ago, stitches said:
Yeah, I remember that exchange. Zierlein probably knows that the mike linebacker in the Tampa 2 scheme is arguably the most important position and it puts huge burden on the player that has to man it up. It requires someone with great athleticism and quickness to drop into deep coverage on pass plays and at the same time someone who can discard blocks and plug holes close to the line of scrimmage on run plays. The prototype for this position in Tampa 2 is Brian Urlacher. Can you guess who Zierlein compared Edmunds to in his profile on nfl.com?
IMO this is the same reason we need to keep an eye on Leighton Vander Esch, who is another one that's being compared to Urlacher.
One thing is for sure... for our defense to be as good as us fans want it to be, we must find our "Urlacher"
Come on, what kind of *ic statement is that?
Le’Raven Clark is awful
in Colts Football
Posted
umm... you do know we played Thursday night and have not had our bye....
Luck is 14th in yards per game.
Our longest pass is 42 yards and that is good for 32nd in the league.
Average pass length is 6.1, that is 40th in the league.
I would not try to argue any point by looking at league wide passing stats