VaAllDay757
-
Posts
2,128 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by VaAllDay757
-
-
8 hours ago, Four2itus said:
Curious, if Adam misses one of those, is that on coach too?
Uh it would be on the kicker....point is don't intentionally leave points on the boards.....if adam makes the kick he would take the credit also
-
1 hour ago, jet1968 said:
Actually it's the players fault they had 0 points today. Poor play execution thru the whole game is why they didnt score.
We didn't kick those 2 field goals that's 6 points alone.....that's on coach
-
1
-
-
4 hours ago, coltfaninnewyork said:
Hate them jags, but they ended our playoff run
We're still in the hunt it hasn't ended
-
It's Frank's fault we had 0 points today so try again
-
2
-
-
Stupid decision were made today he can't coach like that ever again
-
1
-
-
5 hours ago, oldunclemark said:
The reason to worry about Cincy is, obviously, that they own the tiebreaker over the Colts and Miami
Dalton is done for the season and their defensive isn't dominant as it used to be
-
3 hours ago, ColtsBlitz said:
But the Bengals lost Andy Dalton and the Broncos have been doing better, so in terms of the playoff race, I’m more worried about the Broncos based off that
Yeah we have to get in first and we need the ravens to lose for that to happen
-
8 hours ago, ColtsBlitz said:
The Broncos are on the up. They are the team you should be worried about. They are just 1 game behind for the 6th seed
Uh no they're not they're 5-6 we're 6-5....ravens are 6-5 too broncos need to win atleast two straight to stay in the race if we win today and ravens lose we're #6
-
I ain't worried about the bengals I need the ravens to lose
-
He was good guard when he played the position but tackle is not for him I wish him the best tho
-
Hilarious
-
2
-
-
7 minutes ago, Colt Overseas said:
Kevin Bowen said that he didnt have a single snap, despite being activated, suited up and healthy. Hairston lost his place after being beat early in the Raiders game to Maulet, who then lost his place to Wilson after a poor game vs the Jags. Wilson has been very solid since getting his oppertunity, hopefully he will keep it up.
Yeah I know hairston got benched then was on the injury report now he gotta earn his keep again....he was a fan favorite last season hopefully he bounces back he was decent playing in the slot
-
Did Hairston get any snaps yesterday???
-
I really don't care for hewitt but he will probably be the one to be called on sunday
-
This one hurts
-
Yeah I'm glad they did this because the defense always forgets bortles can run if he needs to and gash us for 10 yards easy bring it on
-
I can tell when this forum gets dry people will try anything
-
1
-
-
18 minutes ago, Superman said:
You too smart to be thinking this dumb
1 minute ago, gspdx said:It is losing since you are not winning. See how easy that was?
And you haven't done your job - if you job is to provide a source to confirm your assertion - since the source did not confirm you assertion. There is nothing in that source that says a .500 record is a winning record. You are making that up.
I did my job tho
-
35 minutes ago, Lucky Colts Fan said:
Just like there is no middle in this argument. You're either winning or losing.
And you, sir, are losing. Unanimously. The judges have scored every single round to your opponent. In a landslide.
But feel free to dance around the ring with your arms raised while the ref holds up your opponents arm... smh
Ok believe what you want I did my job
1 hour ago, jvan1973 said:It's not winning either because it isn't ABOVE .500.
It is winning since you not losing
-
1 hour ago, The Old Crow said:
True, you can’t run a QB 27 times, but the Oakland game was more balanced. For the Ravens to make the playoffs, here is what they have to do.
At Atlanta Win
At KC probable loss
TB home Win
At Chargers probable loss
Browns Home Win
Assuming you win the two home games that takes you to eight wins. The key is winning at Atlanta that won’t be easy, and splitting with KC or the LA Chargers, very tough. 4-1 puts them at 10-6, 3-2 at 9-7 with a ton of bubble teams. This is not an easy schedule to say the least.
I would stay with Lamar Jackson the rest of the season. With him, the Ravens running game is electric , and the Ravens always do better running the ball, and playing tough D. Whether they make the playoffs this year or not , they aren’t paying Flacco 28.5 million next year at age 35. They only lose 8 million in cap cutting him, and have Jackson on a rookie deal for a few years with freed up cap, and a top defense.
Its too early to tell if Lamar is Geno Smith it Cam Newton at this point. His passing game must get better to compete with top NFL teams. I would stick with him the rest of the season and roll the dice. That six seed is a total crap shoot right now.
Uhhh not entirely true he's only throw 1 TD pass in his 2 starts and 3 ints so far and both games he threw for under 200 yards which is not good teams are gonna dare him to throw it now because he's not that type of qb to sit in the pocket and pass
-
1 hour ago, Luck 4 president said:
Yes nothing changes. You are still very wrong
multiple posters have explained it but you either don’t read what we’re saying or just are too hard headed to accept that you aren’t always right. You seem like you’d be a pleasure to work with...
Ok I done my part
1 hour ago, John Waylon said:It’s not relevant so it is nothing. It’s like giving a man who is starving to death a pair of gym shorts.
What good was that?
I did my part you still arguing about it lol
47 minutes ago, Coffeedrinker said:So, if 5-5 is a winning record do you also agree it's a losing record?
It's not losing because it's not below .500
-
Ravens will lose probably next week because if lamar jackson continues to be their qb he won't last long anyway
-
2 hours ago, John Waylon said:
Oh boy.
Wikipedia as a reference?
Wikipedia falls squarely between the homeless guy who told Jimmy Haslam to draft Johnny Manziel, and a book from 1812 in terms of reliability on any subject.
Of course in this case that’s actually neither here nor there because you referenced an article about how winning percentages are calculated.
There was precisely 0 about a .500 record being considered winning.
I find it frightening that in a world where everyone refers to a .500 record as... well, a .500 record that there is one lone nut in the forest claiming it’s a winning record. And yet somehow despite being the only one to claim such he actually believes that everyone else is wrong and he is right.
Curious to say the very least.
It's better than nothing you asked for it and I gave it to you so nothing I said changes anyway
-
8 minutes ago, John Waylon said:
Ok, so since you want evidence to prove you wrong, where is the evidence to prove you right?
Surely there’s a scientific formula out there in this crazy old mixed up world that will prove your theory at least valid. I think we’d all like to take a peek at it.
Or we’ll make it even easier than that. Just find us someone of significance that will echo your drivel. Surely there’s a well respected coach, player, or analyst out there who will have said the same thing.
This is 2018. If you’re as right as you claim you are certainly you won’t be the only one out there making this claim, so back it up.
Show me where they even mentioned anything about having a "tied" team record?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winning_percentage
You either have a winning record or losing record
multiple posters have explained it but you either don’t read what we’re saying or just are too hard headed to accept that you aren’t always right. You seem like you’d be a pleasure to work with...
Next Up The Texans
in Colts Football
Posted
This will be a tough game also but houston is due for a L so hopefully we can provide that sunday plus titans playing the jags Thursday they'll have a chance to move up early