-
Posts
540 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by Maniq
-
-
He would be really, really valuable.
But...
Let's not get overboard on signing him. The O-line can be fixed without. We're actually in a good position having 2 really good T's. Let's not blow it on the inside, which is cheaper and per position less important.
-
This is embarrassing. An owner of a team.
-
Sorry, but no he's not.so what is elite C money??? 9 mil???
Then add our extreme need at C (unless Holmes comes out of nowhere and is a probowler this year...) and he is worth $12 mil TO THE COLTS.
This love affair for Mack is a little crazy.
I'd like him, sure. People get impatient and just want the player even though it eventually results in a massive contract due to the uncertainty...
That's not how it works. He's a C, and just b/c we've seen bad things with Satele, McGlynn, and some times Thornton doesn't mean we'll have to break the bank to fix it.
-
I would have nothing to do with a three year contract for Reggie Wayne. It is time for him to retire and walk away before he embarrasses himself. I love what he used to be but that is in the past and this is a business. No place for sentiment.
Dude, you are just way off.
How can you even conclude it is in the past? He has been phenomenal for us up until his injury. Nobody knows if he'll be worse, the same or even better the coming years.
-
I'd pass.
-
Really like this signing. But more importantly. Let's improve the trenches.
-
-
I'm not getting my hopes up high. It will disappoint like the so-called big name WR signing last year.
-
No thanks to McGlynn.
Montgomery is another story
-
Is he visiting anybody or is it only through phone calls to his agent?
-
Interesting.
Still believe we'll address a starting C. Have hopes for BDLP or perhaps still Mack.
-
They should just let us have him after screwing us out of our first rounder.
Call them. I'm sure they will.
-
It doesn't really matter what Mack wants though. If Cleveland wants him back, then he'll be playing for Cleveland.
And if he doesn't sign? I'm just curious
It's not up to Mack, it's up to Cleveland
Entirely?
-
Is he a diva? Read it somewhere. Haven't watched the Giants that much.
-
Isn't this page enough? http://forums.colts.com/topic/27288-colts-in-talks-for-mack/page-9
I get confused with all the topics.
-
So we have went from a 0% chance of this happening...to now a 0.001% chance.
It can happen. I believe. Mack also will have an opinion. It seems like he's interested.
He might be eyeing both $$ and a better shot at getting a ring.
-
"Anytime a player has a chance to talk with a team with a proven record like the Colts, (with) a quarterback and other weapons of the caliber Indy has, it certainly catches your attention," Mack said.
"I don't want to get into who has contacted me. I leave those questions for my agents.""I don't want to get into who has contacted me. I leave those questions for my agents."
"I'm willing to be patient with the process," he said.
-
Wish him luck
-
Could do. Expertise for Chapman. They are both... Ahm, BIG
-
I'd rather draft a WR in the 3rd or 5th. Or sign Nicks.
-
He would be our NT. No need to cut people. That's just stupid.
-
Quite the opposite.
IF he for some reason feels that way, it will only give him more to prove = an even more focused and perhaps better TY.
But, really. It's not a problem
-
Interesting. Though I'm more intrigued on drafting a WR with this deep, deep class. But a proven player could be an option on a conservative deal.
-
Not interested. Too injured
bad news for jimmy/Jim Irsay arrested (((merge)))
in Colts Football
Posted
He needs help. I hope he'll get it.