Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Conversations are moderated for civility. We ask that you please stay on topic. For more info, see our Community Guidelines ×
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

SolidGold

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    338

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by SolidGold

    Hilton's stats among Marv's and Reggie's

    in Colts Football

    Posted

    10 hours ago, Alex22 said:

    Hilton seems to get shut out a lot more than Marvin and Reggie, then he has a big game to pad the numbers.

     

    He is a good receiver but Marvin was one of the best. You just need to compare his TD numbers to Hilton. 

    I would argue that the level of competition Hilton plays against is higher than Marvins. Also It was other weapons on the field with Marvin. Hilton doesn't have that luxury at the moment.

    Colts on Short List for Jarvis Landry Trade

    in NFL Draft, Scouting, and Free Agent Talk

    Posted

    20 minutes ago, oldunclemark said:

    Wide receivers dont take over games. Quarterbacks do.  And we have that guy.

    ..He averages 16 games and 100 receptions a year....and I would disagree that he would not do that for us.

    ...since now he'd be  moving indoors with a QB better than what he's had.

    With TY Hilton, we'd have tow guys who defy man-to-man coverage.

     

    We don't have to be cheap. We can afford him....and we'd get his best years (late 20s)

    I don't know if theres anyone with his potential in the draft.

     

    Since we don't need a QB, what's the downside of switching No,.1 picks with Miami (#11) and getting a proven second Pro Bowl receiver at $15-$16 mil a year?

     

    tenor (10).gif

    Colts on Short List for Jarvis Landry Trade

    in NFL Draft, Scouting, and Free Agent Talk

    Posted

    54 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

     

    For what it's worth......    in all the stories about a possible deal with Miami,   the Colts are not mentioned anymore.

     

    It's Chicago.....     Now, that doesn't mean we're 100 percent out of it....   but i'd get the sense that perhaps we're not hot for a deal unless it's completely on our terms.....     and I don't think that's gonna happen.

     

    So,  I'd say we're fishig elsewhere,  and I'm completely OK with that!          :thmup:

     

     

     

    tenor (8).gif

    And Barkley's first 40 time is.........

    in NFL Draft, Scouting, and Free Agent Talk

    Posted

    1 hour ago, krunk said:

    Who drafts guards over high level pass rushers? Who does that? If Lucks safety and his OL was your concern then why are you trying to draft a RB at 3 with no line? My main thing is people need to stop making up ridiculous sounding stuff just to justify the guy they like. I'm not going to sit here and call Barkley the next Curtis Enis, Kijana Carter(Penn state bust) just to justify taking Chubb. In similar fashion stuff like Jerry Hughes 2.0 is just stupid.

     

    Trying to draft a rb at 3 ? You mean round 3-4 after drafting 2 OL before that? Because that's what I said. And I was also considering we would grab OL in FA before that sooooo..... What facts are u stating ? One thing for sure you still havent came up with anything on how to fix the OL after taking Chubb at 3. And remind yourself why we are in the position to pick this high. I don't think it's because we weren't getting sacks. Picking your favorite player Hughes 2.0 won't solve our biggest problem or even begin to help. I feel if we can trade back with the jets and still grab Nelson will help the team more. And you feel if we take Chubb at 3 it's best for the team. Good thing is neither one of our ideas matter to CB and he knows what's best. And I trust he will deliver.

    And Barkley's first 40 time is.........

    in NFL Draft, Scouting, and Free Agent Talk

    Posted

    1 hour ago, krunk said:

    Exactly. And to me when you're talking about actual production when you look at Barkleys numbers im not seeing 2,000 yards plus like a Mcaffrey or a Rashad Penny. We've seen people with numbers like his before. People who have been selected lower. But this is a generational player? Its all based on physical attributes for the most part. I just don't get all the willingness to be unreasonable about the kid and I like him. Its on a level where statements are being made and accepted that just aren't true. I think the production should be head and shoulders above everyone else and its not. They know that so they go elsewhere and start talking about his physical attributes which doesnt mean much to me. In my view I most certainly believe we will put up 28 a game with or without Barkley as long as Luck is under center. On the other you have the top pass rusher in the draft whose numbers are better than everyone else and definitely in the same ballpark as Miles Garrett and Bosa. Despite these facts we here Dumb stuff like he's no Bosa, or hes no Garrett. What is that based on other than emotions and stubborness? We can make up for missing Barkley. Not so sure about Chubb. People sit here and admit about a weak pass rush class and then Turn around and say oh we can select such and such. Huh? I will stand my ground and stay with my boy Chubb. There is no real evidence to say he's anything less than a beast other than opinions. Perception versus Reality!

    Nothing in this rant keeps Andrew off the turf. We will still win games without Chubb. We wont win games without Andrew. Reality! 

    And Barkley's first 40 time is.........

    in NFL Draft, Scouting, and Free Agent Talk

    Posted

    33 minutes ago, krunk said:

    Braradley Chubb has more TFL over his career than Miles Garrett by a wide Margin. Also more than Joey Bosa by about 3. Tells me how much he lives in the backfield. Sack total could get even better with a tweak here or there. The penetration is there.

    And how many points does that give us without a offensive line. It's pure stupidity to keep boasting about Chubb when he doesn't fix our # 1 problem in any shape or form. Wont matter how many TFL and sacks he racks up if the opposing defense is doing the same to Luck. 

    What Would Luck Do (WWLD)

    in Colts Football

    Posted

    3 hours ago, TdungyW/12 said:

    Can’t waist our #3 pick on josh .... we need a linemen or Chubb. 

    Would never take Josh Allen at 3. What are you talking about? What your referring to is a discussion about trading Brisset and grabbing a QB Later in the draft. The real question was are the QB's in the draft better than Brisset because I was wondering if Cleveland would want him over any of the draftees coming in. But I think they go with Kizer.

    And Barkley's first 40 time is.........

    in NFL Draft, Scouting, and Free Agent Talk

    Posted

    3 hours ago, krunk said:

    silly uninformed opinion, but its yours I guess! Oh and did you watch how Jerry Hughes 2.0 blew right past the guy you're trying to fix our line with? Pop in the ND vs NC State tape

    Is he the best player in the draft ? No 

    Is he anything special that we haven't seen before ? No

    Is he better than the DE the browns drafted last year ? No 

    Is he that much better than Arden Key ? No

    He is the settle pick. He will be a average DE with 7-10 sacks a year. Your hyping up everyone's last pick. Nobody wants him as their first pick but the Colts. Do you really think no other team needs a pass rusher. Nobody is climbing over us to grab the overrated guy. He's overlooked because he's not anything special. He doesn't deserve a top 5 pick IMO

    And Barkley's first 40 time is.........

    in NFL Draft, Scouting, and Free Agent Talk

    Posted

    6 minutes ago, IndyScribe said:

    So you expect Chubb to bust? There's nothing wrong with Chubb at #3. Stuck with him implies you have no choice. If the Browns pick at #4, there's no way to know who they choose. If Colts go with Chubb, then they go with Chubb. Besides, I doubt Browns draft Nelson, either. I think they're more likely to take Fitzpatrick.

    Put it like this. I rather have Nelson over Chubb

    Colts on Short List for Jarvis Landry Trade

    in NFL Draft, Scouting, and Free Agent Talk

    Posted

    5 minutes ago, Luck 4 president said:

    Are you insane?! I love Hilton. He’s my favorite receiver. I even have one of his jerseys, but no way is he 3. And no way is Landry top 5 haha. Ask anyone that’s not biased. 

    To be honest I wanted to be all the way real about how I truly feel and put him #1. I can admit when it comes to the Ghost I'm a homer. He's the best IMO and before you show me AB or Julio's stats or pretty much anyone. Let me stop you and say don't waste your time lol. It won't sway my opinion. Ghost. #13:goat:

×
×
  • Create New...