Coltfreak
-
Posts
1,702 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by Coltfreak
-
-
15 hours ago, crazycolt1 said:
If New England does let a couple of these free agents go the Colts will not be the only ones interested. This comment about bringing these guys in is flawed. There will be 30 other teams looking too. It's not a simple as just bringing them in.
-
Just now, Horse Shoe Heaven said:
Disagree
Numbers don't lie..... and when you check them and see they are better in 14 Take a minute to compare who was playing on the Oline in each year. Who was the center????? Also don't forget who the RB was.
-
24 minutes ago, ColtsBlitz said:
This cant be true. Sheard sucks Woods sucks. Farley sucks. Melvin got hurt so he sucks...... etc etc etc
-
1 minute ago, MB-ColtsFan said:
IF no one offers him anything before the draft he's going to retire? How do you know that?
Well that's a big IF that you left out dont you think?????
-
3 minutes ago, MB-ColtsFan said:
I think the decision on bringing Frank back is made after the draft regardless of whether we get Barkely or not.
Once Frank sees what the situation is in Indy then he can make an informed decision. He will have less
carries in 2018 so it's up to him to decide if he can mentally handle the reduced role.
If we do bring in Barkely then his role is greatly reduced as the kids will probably get the bulk of the load.
Does he really want to be 3rd in line in the offensive scheme?
Would love to have him as a RB coach if no one decides to pick him up. Teaching the kids how to keep their
bodies and minds in NFL shape is a value that can't be overlooked.
Gore is not going to wait until after the draft to make a decision... he is not going to sit around and wait.....
-
7 minutes ago, SLILLINGTON10 said:
Ya Sanchez is a stud but I love Pat, one of my all time favorite colts. Maybe ST coordinator or something?
-
36 minutes ago, Shadow_Creek said:
Even with luck back there's still a good number of pieces we need before our team can be contenders. plus this next draft is still not going to solve all our issues. Id rather gore walk now than redirect our attention away from getting a new running back for the future. we've made that mistake way to many times now dating back to grigs choosing to trade for Richardson instead of taking a qualified back 2nd or 3rd round in the draft.
Ok. Fine.... but to say he needs to not be picked up because he deserves better is stupid
-
On 1/15/2018 at 2:47 PM, jameszeigler834 said:
Knock Brady out of the game that's the only way jags win.
Dilly Dilly!!!
-
44 minutes ago, Coffeedrinker said:
And Monachino was an instant upgrade over Maunsky
And Manusky was an instant upgrade over Coyer
And Coyer was an instant upgrade over Meeks
And Meeks was an instant upgrade over Fangio.
He seems like he could be good but the last good DC the Colts had was Meeks.
No he wasn't
-
4 hours ago, Shadow_Creek said:
2018 might be Gores last chance for a Superbowl and if we were to resign him it would be a huge disappointment. He deserves a contender team, and not a team that's just in the process of catching there second wind. Thoughts?
Glad your already counting the Colts out next year. That's the spirit
-
15 hours ago, NewColtsFan said:
Offense: Luck improved in 16. And Brissett did well under difficult circumstanes. Others who improved, Doyle and Swoope and Rodgers and some guy named Hilton. So did AC. So did Turbin.
Defense: Sheard had a decent seaason. As did Hankins and Woods and Hunt and Mingo and Simon. How about the secondary, where Melvin and Desir and Hairston and Farley and Milton and Moore.
I appreciate that the season was terrible, but that doesn't mean there weren't bright spots. Simply trying to say that nobody improved or got better under Chud and Ted is demonstrably false.
Lucks best yr was Peps last yr. not Chuds first yr or anytime after Chud took over. although he played well in 16. 14 was Lucks best yr
-
.......................................
-
The Oline will be much better by default. Getting rid of Chud and his stupid playbook will do wonders to. Help the Oline. If it really is McDaniels I believe we could actually roll as is with maybe 1 upgrade if Mewhort retires.
-
37 minutes ago, bleed blue 4 life said:
how did we lose our oline coach ?
Without a parting gift.
-
If McDaniels is the HC. What part of the NE offense shows any of you that we need to waste a 1st round pick on a RB?
-
1 minute ago, masnerj said:
I think we can all agree to one thing on this forum at this point: Nothing would be better than the Steelers (for some reason I don't hate them as much as most people on this forum) coming back to beat the Jags and then rolling into NE and beating the Patriots next week so that we can hire a coach and get all these "rumors" "its been reported" shenanigans done with.
That being said, McDaniels at HC/OC (his OC will essentially be a placeholder considering McDanny will be calling plays) and Coach Flus at DC sounds hella appealing of a coaching staff at this stage. Imagine that plus 1 more year of a Ballard offseason. Regardless of how you feel about McDaniels, it is hard to deny that this is our best scenario at this point and we should all be rooting for this.
Why are you already so hi on Flus?
-
2 minutes ago, Blueblood23 said:
And Bill Belichick was a failure in Cleveland. Surprised NE hired him and was successful.
Actually after Cleveland he was a DB coach then a defensive coordinator for 4 years under Parcells before he took a the Pats job
-
12 minutes ago, lance_m8 said:
Superman just liked my comment lowkey fanboying right now
Now your life is complete
-
Man there are a lot of empty seats.... Cold or underestimating the Jaggoffs ?
-
3 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:
If Francesa is saying that then he's basing it on the assumption that Andrew Luck returns to 100 percent health.
Almost every story I read about ranking the HC jobs has the Colts first if --- IF --- Luck returns to his old self. But if he doesn't, well not so much... QB is everything in the NFL.
They also know that they will have a better idea about Luck before the draft and have the 3rd pick and could select a very good QB in the draft. So Having Luck is ideal, there are still options
-
I think this could end up being a brilliant move by Irsay saying this. It could very well cause the Browns to take Barkley with the 1st knowing that a QB will still be available with the 4th pick. Then we will have more trading power with the 3rd
-
Crazy that we have another thread already discussing this.... But hey. I like reading the same thing in multiple threads
-
For all of you wanting him to stay. WHY?
He is not a fit for McDaniels. He does not run a scheme that is even close to what we need here
I swear a little research before posting would raise the intelligence factor of this board. He was here because he was like Chud. He's never been good
-
3 minutes ago, MightyLucks said:
I hope this is all true. Eberflaus from what I can tell will make a good DC
You got that much confidence from just reading that article?
McDaniels Co-Ordinators Lined Up
in Colts Football
Posted
TD to Int. 2014- 40-16. Compared to 32-13 in 2016. Completion percentage was about the same. Sacked 41 times in 16. Only 27 in 2014.
3rd ranked passing offense in 14. 8th in 16
Again. The Oline that he played behind in 2014 Was bad.... really bad.... And Trent Richardson was the RB in 14. So no one respected the run. Bradshaw was there but he got limited carries compared to Trent
And of course went to the AFCCG in 2014
Everyone can say whatever they want but Pep's offense was better than Chuds. Pep my not have been great but he was better than Chud. And of course it was the offens that Luck knew in his sleep.
But to be fair to both..... A lot of the scheme may have been dictated by a HC that was looking for something that just wasn't a strength to the team and especially Luck