SouthernCal
-
Posts
620 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by SouthernCal
-
-
so at least we only play them every 4 years not every year like brady
No. Winning superbowls. Two straight......
-
i hope Sherman isnt too injured. Go the seahawks in 2 weeks time. make brady a 3 time losing superbowl qb
Then Wilson will be Brady....
-
No problem. I was just amusing myself with how that was called a great performance by the 2 posters that always RG3>A Luck and now it's RW. If Luck had thrown 0 TD's and 4 Ints vs GB , we would have been down by at least 30.
-
I know.Thats ok.
-
Receivers need to step up in the 2nd half.
-
I like that game winner part. Thank you. I think this game is played to win?.
I'm still not giving any credit.
-
Other than throwing a game winner AND 4 ints with a top 5 defense to cover for you.So Russell didnt do anything today?
-
Will we ever score
-
Murray fumbled only 3 times in the regular season.
-
??????47 is the number of a player you expect to be eligible, so boom goes your numbering argument
-
Your suggestion takes away from the competitive nature of the sport.
Explain.
-
No, but they weren't costly.
-
-
AFC championship game? Is this real life?
-
-
Great play Vontae
-
Holding after holding wth
-
-
a punt basically. Bad play by Luck and Moncrief. I like the play though.
-
Colts/Pats wasn't the same once 18 went west.
The Ravens have gone to Foxboro twice now and sent the Pats on vacation. Until this team does something similar it won't ever be the Colts/Pats rivalry that it once was.
The Colts' (Luck's) new rivalry hasn't been started yet I don't believe.
And it won't be a rivalry because Luck is 25 or 26. Brady is 36 or 37.
-
They've only won more games than any other NFL team since then, went to two SBs, losing them by a combined 7 points.
Yep, winning more games is nothing.
/sarcasm off
And you won the Super Bowls by a combined 9 points. Moot point about them losing the super bowls.
-
Pessimists
-
He's a Pats fan looking for an easy dig at us lol.
He was saying no Green=better Dalton. I wholly disagree. He may make more mistakes, but no Green eliminates all their big play ability.
I'm also certainly not arguing Dalton doesn't need to mature and grow as a QB, and not rely so heavily on Green.
Why is there so many Pats fans in our board?
-
He's saying Dalton would be better off without Green. He is not. He could stand to not lock onto Green, but not having him doesn't make them a better team, or Dalton a better QB.
He also the said we got off easy because Green wasn't in.
So first it's better without Green, and then it becomes a detriment magically after we win.
Weird.
Dalton is not better off without Green long term like ever obviously. Same as Stafford. But both cannot be worst without Green/Calvin. Becauses it shows signs that your QB is not actually good.
Luck had the same situation when he was throwing to Wayne most of the time in his 2nd year and Ty and Fleener had to develop. Now the colts are the number one passing offense in the league.
If MJD is saying No Green = Bengals win, then you're dealing with a closet Dalton/Bengals fan. And that is weird as ****.
Colts @ Patriots 2015 AFC Championship Game Thread
in Colts Game Day
Posted
Awful tackling